出院后的健康和生活质量:阿片类药物治疗创伤或手术后急性疼痛的前瞻性研究。

Anne Mari Gunnheim Klausen , Jorunn Drageset , Frøydis Kristine Bruvik
{"title":"出院后的健康和生活质量:阿片类药物治疗创伤或手术后急性疼痛的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Anne Mari Gunnheim Klausen ,&nbsp;Jorunn Drageset ,&nbsp;Frøydis Kristine Bruvik","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine opioid use, health, quality of life, and pain after discharge from hospital in opioid naïve patients receiving opioid treatment for sub acute pain after trauma or surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective cohort with a four-week follow-up was conducted. Of the 62 patients included, 58 remained in the follow-up. The following questionnaires were assessed: Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS), EQ-5D-5L (health-related quality of life) and EQ-VAS (self-reported health). Paired <em>t</em>-test, two-sample <em>t</em>-test and chi square test were used in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Every fourth participant still received opioid treatment at follow-up, and reported no significant increase in EQ-VAS. Overall, an improvement in EQ-5D-5L (0.569 (SD = 0.233) to 0.694 (SD = 0.152), p &lt; 0.001) and EQ-VAS (55 (SD = 20) to 63 (SD = 18), p = 0.001) from baseline to follow-up was found. Pain intensity decreased in the same period (6.4 (SD = 2.2) to 3.5 (SD = 2.6), p &lt; 0.001). An unmet need for information regarding pain management was reported by 32% of the participants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings show that patients with acute pain, treated with opioids, reported improved pain intensity, health-related quality of life and self-reported health four weeks after discharge. There is room for improvement regarding the provision of patient information on pain management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health and quality of life after discharge from hospital: A prospective study on opioid treatment for acute pain after trauma or surgery\",\"authors\":\"Anne Mari Gunnheim Klausen ,&nbsp;Jorunn Drageset ,&nbsp;Frøydis Kristine Bruvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine opioid use, health, quality of life, and pain after discharge from hospital in opioid naïve patients receiving opioid treatment for sub acute pain after trauma or surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective cohort with a four-week follow-up was conducted. Of the 62 patients included, 58 remained in the follow-up. The following questionnaires were assessed: Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS), EQ-5D-5L (health-related quality of life) and EQ-VAS (self-reported health). Paired <em>t</em>-test, two-sample <em>t</em>-test and chi square test were used in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Every fourth participant still received opioid treatment at follow-up, and reported no significant increase in EQ-VAS. Overall, an improvement in EQ-5D-5L (0.569 (SD = 0.233) to 0.694 (SD = 0.152), p &lt; 0.001) and EQ-VAS (55 (SD = 20) to 63 (SD = 18), p = 0.001) from baseline to follow-up was found. Pain intensity decreased in the same period (6.4 (SD = 2.2) to 3.5 (SD = 2.6), p &lt; 0.001). An unmet need for information regarding pain management was reported by 32% of the participants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings show that patients with acute pain, treated with opioids, reported improved pain intensity, health-related quality of life and self-reported health four weeks after discharge. There is room for improvement regarding the provision of patient information on pain management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检查因创伤或手术后亚急性疼痛而接受阿片类药物治疗的阿片类天真患者的阿片药物使用、健康、生活质量和出院后疼痛。方法:进行为期四周的前瞻性队列随访。在包括在内的62名患者中,58名仍在随访中。评估了以下问卷:疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)、EQ-5D-5L(健康相关的生活质量)和EQ-VAS(自我报告的健康状况)。本研究采用配对t检验、双样本t检验和卡方检验。结果:在随访中,每四分之一的参与者仍然接受阿片类药物治疗,并且报告EQ-VAS没有显著增加。总体而言,EQ-5D-5L(0.569(SD=0.233)至0.694(SD=0.152)有所改善,p结论:我们的研究结果表明,接受阿片类药物治疗的急性疼痛患者在出院四周后报告疼痛强度、健康相关的生活质量和自我报告的健康状况有所改善。在提供患者疼痛管理信息方面还有改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health and quality of life after discharge from hospital: A prospective study on opioid treatment for acute pain after trauma or surgery

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine opioid use, health, quality of life, and pain after discharge from hospital in opioid naïve patients receiving opioid treatment for sub acute pain after trauma or surgery.

Methods

A prospective cohort with a four-week follow-up was conducted. Of the 62 patients included, 58 remained in the follow-up. The following questionnaires were assessed: Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS), EQ-5D-5L (health-related quality of life) and EQ-VAS (self-reported health). Paired t-test, two-sample t-test and chi square test were used in the study.

Results

Every fourth participant still received opioid treatment at follow-up, and reported no significant increase in EQ-VAS. Overall, an improvement in EQ-5D-5L (0.569 (SD = 0.233) to 0.694 (SD = 0.152), p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS (55 (SD = 20) to 63 (SD = 18), p = 0.001) from baseline to follow-up was found. Pain intensity decreased in the same period (6.4 (SD = 2.2) to 3.5 (SD = 2.6), p < 0.001). An unmet need for information regarding pain management was reported by 32% of the participants.

Conclusions

Our findings show that patients with acute pain, treated with opioids, reported improved pain intensity, health-related quality of life and self-reported health four weeks after discharge. There is room for improvement regarding the provision of patient information on pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Current status of postoperative care for elderly osteoporotic fracture patients in Jiangsu Province, China: A multicenter cross-sectional study Corrigendum to "The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review" [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048]. LITERATURE REVIEWS – The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on bone healing and tissue regeneration Health literacy of older adults with musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1