虚拟现实减少女性阴道镜检查的焦虑:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000745
Julia M Hecken, Pia Halagiera, Sadia Rehman, Clemens B Tempfer, Günther A Rezniczek
{"title":"虚拟现实减少女性阴道镜检查的焦虑:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Julia M Hecken,&nbsp;Pia Halagiera,&nbsp;Sadia Rehman,&nbsp;Clemens B Tempfer,&nbsp;Günther A Rezniczek","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test whether headset-delivered virtual reality (VR) content affects satisfaction and/or anxiety in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions undergoing colposcopy and colposcopically guided cervical biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized trial, the authors measured overall satisfaction (100-mm visual analog scale) and situation-specific anxiety (STAI-S) in 247 women with suspected cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions wearing either no VR headset (arm 1, control) or a VR headset before (arm 2) or before and during colposcopy (arm 3). Secondary endpoints were pain, discomfort, and anxiety during colposcopy, heart rate, and 72-hour follow-up parameters: overall satisfaction, bleeding severity, bleeding duration, pain, and use of analgesics. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median values for overall satisfaction were 100 (interquartile range, 90-100) in controls (n = 83), 100 (95-100) in arm 2 (n = 82), and 100 (95-100) in arm 3 (n = 82), respectively ( p = .92). The median Δ of situational anxiety (baseline vs after colposcopy) was -8 (-13 to -3), -8 (-16.5 to -4), and -10 (-20.5 to -4.5), respectively ( p = .09). The secondary endpoints pain during colposcopy (20 [10-50] vs 20 [10-40] vs 30 [10-50]; p = .65), discomfort during colposcopy (30 [10-50] vs 30 [10-50] vs 20 [10-50]; p = .46), and anxiety during colposcopy (20 [0-50] vs 10 [0-40] vs 10 [0-30]; p = .44), were not different between arms. Follow-up data showed no improvement in the 2 VR arms compared with controls (overall satisfaction, p = .37; bleeding severity, p = .09; pain level, p = .89; duration of pain; p = .23; and use of analgesics; p = .39). Per-protocol analysis did not change the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A VR headset showing a 360-degree surround vision film has no effect on satisfaction or anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":"27 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Reality for Anxiety Reduction in Women Undergoing Colposcopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julia M Hecken,&nbsp;Pia Halagiera,&nbsp;Sadia Rehman,&nbsp;Clemens B Tempfer,&nbsp;Günther A Rezniczek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test whether headset-delivered virtual reality (VR) content affects satisfaction and/or anxiety in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions undergoing colposcopy and colposcopically guided cervical biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized trial, the authors measured overall satisfaction (100-mm visual analog scale) and situation-specific anxiety (STAI-S) in 247 women with suspected cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions wearing either no VR headset (arm 1, control) or a VR headset before (arm 2) or before and during colposcopy (arm 3). Secondary endpoints were pain, discomfort, and anxiety during colposcopy, heart rate, and 72-hour follow-up parameters: overall satisfaction, bleeding severity, bleeding duration, pain, and use of analgesics. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median values for overall satisfaction were 100 (interquartile range, 90-100) in controls (n = 83), 100 (95-100) in arm 2 (n = 82), and 100 (95-100) in arm 3 (n = 82), respectively ( p = .92). The median Δ of situational anxiety (baseline vs after colposcopy) was -8 (-13 to -3), -8 (-16.5 to -4), and -10 (-20.5 to -4.5), respectively ( p = .09). The secondary endpoints pain during colposcopy (20 [10-50] vs 20 [10-40] vs 30 [10-50]; p = .65), discomfort during colposcopy (30 [10-50] vs 30 [10-50] vs 20 [10-50]; p = .46), and anxiety during colposcopy (20 [0-50] vs 10 [0-40] vs 10 [0-30]; p = .44), were not different between arms. Follow-up data showed no improvement in the 2 VR arms compared with controls (overall satisfaction, p = .37; bleeding severity, p = .09; pain level, p = .89; duration of pain; p = .23; and use of analgesics; p = .39). Per-protocol analysis did not change the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A VR headset showing a 360-degree surround vision film has no effect on satisfaction or anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"223-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000745\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:测试头戴式虚拟现实(VR)内容是否会影响阴道镜检查和阴道镜引导下宫颈活检的宫颈鳞状上皮内病变妇女的满意度和/或焦虑。方法:在这项单中心随机试验中,作者测量了247名疑似宫颈鳞状上皮内病变的女性的总体满意度(100毫米视觉模拟量表)和情境特异性焦虑(STAI-S),这些女性在阴道镜检查(1组,对照组)之前(2组)或阴道镜检查之前和期间(3组)不戴VR耳机。次要终点是阴道镜检查期间的疼痛、不适和焦虑、心率和72小时随访参数。总体满意度,出血严重程度,出血持续时间,疼痛和镇痛药的使用。分析的目的是治疗。结果:总体满意度中位数在对照组(n = 83)为100(四分位数范围,90-100),在第二组(n = 82)为100(95-100),在第三组(n = 82)为100 (95-100)(p = 0.92)。情境焦虑的中位Δ(基线与阴道镜检查后)分别为-8(-13至-3),-8(-16.5至-4)和-10(-20.5至-4.5)(p = 0.09)。阴道镜检查的次要终点疼痛(20 [10-50]vs 20 [10-40] vs 30 [10-50];P = .65),阴道镜检查时不适感(30 [10-50]vs 30 [10-50] vs 20 [10-50];P = .46),阴道镜检查时焦虑(20 [0-50]vs 10 [0-40] vs 10 [0-30];P = 0.44),两组间无差异。随访数据显示,与对照组相比,2个VR手臂没有改善(总体满意度,p = 0.37;出血严重程度,p = .09;疼痛程度,p = 0.89;疼痛持续时间;P = .23;镇痛药的使用;P = .39)。按协议分析没有改变结果。结论:显示360度环视电影的VR头戴设备对女性阴道镜检查的满意度和焦虑感没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtual Reality for Anxiety Reduction in Women Undergoing Colposcopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To test whether headset-delivered virtual reality (VR) content affects satisfaction and/or anxiety in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions undergoing colposcopy and colposcopically guided cervical biopsy.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized trial, the authors measured overall satisfaction (100-mm visual analog scale) and situation-specific anxiety (STAI-S) in 247 women with suspected cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions wearing either no VR headset (arm 1, control) or a VR headset before (arm 2) or before and during colposcopy (arm 3). Secondary endpoints were pain, discomfort, and anxiety during colposcopy, heart rate, and 72-hour follow-up parameters: overall satisfaction, bleeding severity, bleeding duration, pain, and use of analgesics. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: Median values for overall satisfaction were 100 (interquartile range, 90-100) in controls (n = 83), 100 (95-100) in arm 2 (n = 82), and 100 (95-100) in arm 3 (n = 82), respectively ( p = .92). The median Δ of situational anxiety (baseline vs after colposcopy) was -8 (-13 to -3), -8 (-16.5 to -4), and -10 (-20.5 to -4.5), respectively ( p = .09). The secondary endpoints pain during colposcopy (20 [10-50] vs 20 [10-40] vs 30 [10-50]; p = .65), discomfort during colposcopy (30 [10-50] vs 30 [10-50] vs 20 [10-50]; p = .46), and anxiety during colposcopy (20 [0-50] vs 10 [0-40] vs 10 [0-30]; p = .44), were not different between arms. Follow-up data showed no improvement in the 2 VR arms compared with controls (overall satisfaction, p = .37; bleeding severity, p = .09; pain level, p = .89; duration of pain; p = .23; and use of analgesics; p = .39). Per-protocol analysis did not change the results.

Conclusions: A VR headset showing a 360-degree surround vision film has no effect on satisfaction or anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
期刊最新文献
Tiktok as a Source of Education and Misinformation in Lichen Sclerosus. Sexual Distress and Quality of Life in Women With Genital Erosive Lichen Planus-A Cross-sectional Study. Validation of the 2019 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Online Cervical Cancer Screening Program via 9 Large-Cohort Data of Chinese Women. The Distribution of Cervical Transformation Zone and Its Impact on Colposcopic Diagnosis: A Multicenter Study in China. The Barriers and Perceived Benefits to Vulvar Self-examination in the Management of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1