胆道支架移位致盲肠穿孔是ERCP的罕见并发症:1例报告并文献复习。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Case Reports in Surgery Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/9493333
Arash Mohammadi Tofigh, Hamed Tahmasbi, Majid Iranshahi, Alireza Haghbin Toutounchi, Hojatolah Khoshnoudi, Seyed Pedram Kouchak Hosseini
{"title":"胆道支架移位致盲肠穿孔是ERCP的罕见并发症:1例报告并文献复习。","authors":"Arash Mohammadi Tofigh,&nbsp;Hamed Tahmasbi,&nbsp;Majid Iranshahi,&nbsp;Alireza Haghbin Toutounchi,&nbsp;Hojatolah Khoshnoudi,&nbsp;Seyed Pedram Kouchak Hosseini","doi":"10.1155/2023/9493333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction and Importance.</i> Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a non-surgical method utilized to manage biliary tract obstruction, but the complication of biliary stent migration occurs in 5-10% of patients. Though migrated stents are commonly passed through the gastrointestinal tract without harm, intestinal perforation is a rare but severe complication, affecting less than 1% of cases. <i>Case Presentation.</i> We report a case of a 65-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, and loss of appetite. According to clinical examination and evidence, the patient underwent surgery with high suspicion of appendicitis, which unexpectedly uncovered a perforated cecum with a protruding biliary stent. <i>Clinical Discussion.</i> Our report describes a unique and unexpected finding of cecal perforation caused by a migrated biliary stent in a patient. We also conducted a review of current literature on ERCP complications, including risk factors for stent migration, relevant statistics, and appropriate interventions. <i>Conclusion.</i> Surgeons should be aware of the risk of stent migration and complications in patients with a history of ERCP. Removal of migrated biliary stents is recommended, regardless of the presence of complications. Additional assessments for alternative diagnoses are recommended for older patients with abdominal pain complaints. Flexible plastic stents should be used for patients at risk of stent passage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9600,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Surgery","volume":"2023 ","pages":"9493333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cecal Perforation Induced by Migrated Biliary Stent as a Rare Complication of ERCP: A Case Report and Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Mohammadi Tofigh,&nbsp;Hamed Tahmasbi,&nbsp;Majid Iranshahi,&nbsp;Alireza Haghbin Toutounchi,&nbsp;Hojatolah Khoshnoudi,&nbsp;Seyed Pedram Kouchak Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/9493333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction and Importance.</i> Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a non-surgical method utilized to manage biliary tract obstruction, but the complication of biliary stent migration occurs in 5-10% of patients. Though migrated stents are commonly passed through the gastrointestinal tract without harm, intestinal perforation is a rare but severe complication, affecting less than 1% of cases. <i>Case Presentation.</i> We report a case of a 65-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, and loss of appetite. According to clinical examination and evidence, the patient underwent surgery with high suspicion of appendicitis, which unexpectedly uncovered a perforated cecum with a protruding biliary stent. <i>Clinical Discussion.</i> Our report describes a unique and unexpected finding of cecal perforation caused by a migrated biliary stent in a patient. We also conducted a review of current literature on ERCP complications, including risk factors for stent migration, relevant statistics, and appropriate interventions. <i>Conclusion.</i> Surgeons should be aware of the risk of stent migration and complications in patients with a history of ERCP. Removal of migrated biliary stents is recommended, regardless of the presence of complications. Additional assessments for alternative diagnoses are recommended for older patients with abdominal pain complaints. Flexible plastic stents should be used for patients at risk of stent passage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Reports in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"9493333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Reports in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9493333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9493333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和重要性。内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)是一种治疗胆道梗阻的非手术方法,但5-10%的患者发生胆道支架移位并发症。虽然移植物支架通常通过胃肠道而无损害,但肠道穿孔是一种罕见但严重的并发症,影响不到1%的病例。案例演示。我们报告一例65岁的妇女谁提出了腹痛,恶心,食欲不振的症状急诊科。根据临床检查和证据,患者在高度怀疑阑尾炎的情况下接受手术,意外发现盲肠穿孔并胆道支架突出。临床的讨论。我们的报告描述了一个独特的和意想不到的发现盲肠穿孔引起的胆道支架移位的病人。我们还回顾了目前关于ERCP并发症的文献,包括支架迁移的危险因素、相关统计数据和适当的干预措施。结论。外科医生应该意识到有ERCP病史的患者支架移位和并发症的风险。不论是否有并发症,建议切除移位的胆道支架。对于有腹痛主诉的老年患者,建议对其他诊断进行额外评估。有支架通过风险的患者应使用柔性塑料支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cecal Perforation Induced by Migrated Biliary Stent as a Rare Complication of ERCP: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Introduction and Importance. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a non-surgical method utilized to manage biliary tract obstruction, but the complication of biliary stent migration occurs in 5-10% of patients. Though migrated stents are commonly passed through the gastrointestinal tract without harm, intestinal perforation is a rare but severe complication, affecting less than 1% of cases. Case Presentation. We report a case of a 65-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, and loss of appetite. According to clinical examination and evidence, the patient underwent surgery with high suspicion of appendicitis, which unexpectedly uncovered a perforated cecum with a protruding biliary stent. Clinical Discussion. Our report describes a unique and unexpected finding of cecal perforation caused by a migrated biliary stent in a patient. We also conducted a review of current literature on ERCP complications, including risk factors for stent migration, relevant statistics, and appropriate interventions. Conclusion. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of stent migration and complications in patients with a history of ERCP. Removal of migrated biliary stents is recommended, regardless of the presence of complications. Additional assessments for alternative diagnoses are recommended for older patients with abdominal pain complaints. Flexible plastic stents should be used for patients at risk of stent passage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intramural Intestinal Metastasis of Malignant Melanoma as a Rare Cause of Ileoileal Intussusception: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. A Rare Case of Linear Phlebolith: Foreign Body Discovered in the Femoral Vein. A Case of Radical Resection of Esophageal Basaloid Cell Carcinoma After Hemostasis by Transarterial Embolization. A Large Thoracolumbosacral Meningomyelocele From Northern Tanzania: A Case Report. Iatrogenic Proximal Urethro-Rectal Perforation During Foley Catheter Insertion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1