抗生素使用对猪体内微生物组和抵抗组动态的影响。

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Animal microbiome Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1186/s42523-023-00258-4
Katrine Wegener Tams, Inge Larsen, Julie Elvekjær Hansen, Henrik Spiegelhauer, Alexander Damm Strøm-Hansen, Sophia Rasmussen, Anna Cäcilia Ingham, Lajos Kalmar, Iain Robert Louis Kean, Øystein Angen, Mark A Holmes, Karl Pedersen, Lars Jelsbak, Anders Folkesson, Anders Rhod Larsen, Mikael Lenz Strube
{"title":"抗生素使用对猪体内微生物组和抵抗组动态的影响。","authors":"Katrine Wegener Tams, Inge Larsen, Julie Elvekjær Hansen, Henrik Spiegelhauer, Alexander Damm Strøm-Hansen, Sophia Rasmussen, Anna Cäcilia Ingham, Lajos Kalmar, Iain Robert Louis Kean, Øystein Angen, Mark A Holmes, Karl Pedersen, Lars Jelsbak, Anders Folkesson, Anders Rhod Larsen, Mikael Lenz Strube","doi":"10.1186/s42523-023-00258-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics are widely used in pig farming across the world which has led to concerns about the potential impact on human health through the selection of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria. This worry has resulted in the development of a production scheme known as pigs Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA), in which pigs are produced in commercial farms, but are ear-tagged as RWA until slaughter unless they receive treatment, thus allowing the farmer to sell the pigs either as premium priced RWA or as conventional meat. Development of antibiotic resistance in pig farming has been studied in national surveys of antibiotic usage and resistance, as well as in experimental studies of groups of pigs, but not in individual pigs followed longitudinally in a commercial pig farm. In this study, a cohort of RWA designated pigs were sampled at 10 time points from birth until slaughter along with pen-mates treated with antibiotics at the same farm. From these samples, the microbiome, determined using 16S sequencing, and the resistome, as determined using qPCR for 82 resistance genes, was investigated, allowing us to examine the difference between RWA pigs and antibiotic treated pigs. We furthermore included 176 additional pigs from six different RWA farms which were sampled at the slaughterhouse as an endpoint to substantiate the cohort as well as for evaluation of intra-farm variability. The results showed a clear effect of age in both the microbiome and resistome composition from early life up until slaughter. As a function of antibiotic treatment, however, we observed a small but significant divergence between treated and untreated animals in their microbiome composition immediately following treatment, which disappeared before 8 weeks of age. The effect on the resistome was evident and an effect of treatment could still be detected at week 8. In animals sampled at the slaughterhouse, we observed no difference in the microbiome or the resistome as a result of treatment status but did see a strong effect of farm origin. Network analysis of co-occurrence of microbiome and resistome data suggested that some resistance genes may be transferred through mobile genetic elements, so we used Hi-C metagenomics on a subset of samples to investigate this. We conclude that antibiotic treatment has a differential effect on the microbiome vs. the resistome and that although resistance gene load is increased by antibiotic treatment load, this effect disappears before slaughter. More studies are needed to elucidate the optimal way to rear pigs without antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of antibiotic use on the dynamics of the microbiome and resistome in pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Katrine Wegener Tams, Inge Larsen, Julie Elvekjær Hansen, Henrik Spiegelhauer, Alexander Damm Strøm-Hansen, Sophia Rasmussen, Anna Cäcilia Ingham, Lajos Kalmar, Iain Robert Louis Kean, Øystein Angen, Mark A Holmes, Karl Pedersen, Lars Jelsbak, Anders Folkesson, Anders Rhod Larsen, Mikael Lenz Strube\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42523-023-00258-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotics are widely used in pig farming across the world which has led to concerns about the potential impact on human health through the selection of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria. This worry has resulted in the development of a production scheme known as pigs Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA), in which pigs are produced in commercial farms, but are ear-tagged as RWA until slaughter unless they receive treatment, thus allowing the farmer to sell the pigs either as premium priced RWA or as conventional meat. Development of antibiotic resistance in pig farming has been studied in national surveys of antibiotic usage and resistance, as well as in experimental studies of groups of pigs, but not in individual pigs followed longitudinally in a commercial pig farm. In this study, a cohort of RWA designated pigs were sampled at 10 time points from birth until slaughter along with pen-mates treated with antibiotics at the same farm. From these samples, the microbiome, determined using 16S sequencing, and the resistome, as determined using qPCR for 82 resistance genes, was investigated, allowing us to examine the difference between RWA pigs and antibiotic treated pigs. We furthermore included 176 additional pigs from six different RWA farms which were sampled at the slaughterhouse as an endpoint to substantiate the cohort as well as for evaluation of intra-farm variability. The results showed a clear effect of age in both the microbiome and resistome composition from early life up until slaughter. As a function of antibiotic treatment, however, we observed a small but significant divergence between treated and untreated animals in their microbiome composition immediately following treatment, which disappeared before 8 weeks of age. The effect on the resistome was evident and an effect of treatment could still be detected at week 8. In animals sampled at the slaughterhouse, we observed no difference in the microbiome or the resistome as a result of treatment status but did see a strong effect of farm origin. Network analysis of co-occurrence of microbiome and resistome data suggested that some resistance genes may be transferred through mobile genetic elements, so we used Hi-C metagenomics on a subset of samples to investigate this. We conclude that antibiotic treatment has a differential effect on the microbiome vs. the resistome and that although resistance gene load is increased by antibiotic treatment load, this effect disappears before slaughter. More studies are needed to elucidate the optimal way to rear pigs without antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00258-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00258-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素在世界各地的养猪业中广泛使用,这引起了人们对抗生素抗性致病菌选择对人类健康的潜在影响的担忧。这种担忧导致了一种名为“无抗生素饲养猪”(RWA)的生产计划的发展,在这种计划中,猪在商业农场生产,但在屠宰前被贴上RWA的耳标,除非它们接受治疗,这样农民就可以将猪作为高价RWA或传统肉类出售。在全国抗生素使用和耐药性调查以及猪群的实验研究中,已经研究了养猪业中抗生素耐药性的发展,但没有对商业养猪场中单个猪进行纵向跟踪。在这项研究中,一组RWA指定的猪从出生到屠宰的10个时间点与在同一农场接受抗生素治疗的舍友一起取样。从这些样本中,研究了使用16S测序确定的微生物组和使用qPCR确定的82个耐药基因的抗性组,使我们能够检查RWA猪和抗生素治疗猪之间的差异。此外,我们还从六个不同的RWA农场额外纳入了176头猪,这些猪在屠宰场取样,作为验证队列和评估农场内变异性的终点。结果表明,从生命早期到屠宰,年龄对微生物组和抵抗组组成都有明显的影响。然而,作为抗生素治疗的一个功能,我们观察到治疗后和未治疗的动物之间的微生物组组成在治疗后立即存在微小但显著的差异,这种差异在8周龄前消失。对抵抗组的影响是明显的,在第8周仍能检测到治疗的效果。在屠宰场取样的动物中,我们观察到微生物组或抵抗组没有因处理状态而产生差异,但确实看到了农场来源的强烈影响。同时出现的微生物组和抵抗组数据的网络分析表明,一些耐药基因可能通过移动遗传元件转移,因此我们使用Hi-C宏基因组学对一部分样本进行了研究。我们得出结论,抗生素治疗对微生物组和抵抗组有不同的影响,尽管抗生素治疗负荷增加了耐药基因负荷,但这种影响在屠宰前消失。需要更多的研究来阐明无抗生素养猪的最佳方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of antibiotic use on the dynamics of the microbiome and resistome in pigs.

Antibiotics are widely used in pig farming across the world which has led to concerns about the potential impact on human health through the selection of antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria. This worry has resulted in the development of a production scheme known as pigs Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA), in which pigs are produced in commercial farms, but are ear-tagged as RWA until slaughter unless they receive treatment, thus allowing the farmer to sell the pigs either as premium priced RWA or as conventional meat. Development of antibiotic resistance in pig farming has been studied in national surveys of antibiotic usage and resistance, as well as in experimental studies of groups of pigs, but not in individual pigs followed longitudinally in a commercial pig farm. In this study, a cohort of RWA designated pigs were sampled at 10 time points from birth until slaughter along with pen-mates treated with antibiotics at the same farm. From these samples, the microbiome, determined using 16S sequencing, and the resistome, as determined using qPCR for 82 resistance genes, was investigated, allowing us to examine the difference between RWA pigs and antibiotic treated pigs. We furthermore included 176 additional pigs from six different RWA farms which were sampled at the slaughterhouse as an endpoint to substantiate the cohort as well as for evaluation of intra-farm variability. The results showed a clear effect of age in both the microbiome and resistome composition from early life up until slaughter. As a function of antibiotic treatment, however, we observed a small but significant divergence between treated and untreated animals in their microbiome composition immediately following treatment, which disappeared before 8 weeks of age. The effect on the resistome was evident and an effect of treatment could still be detected at week 8. In animals sampled at the slaughterhouse, we observed no difference in the microbiome or the resistome as a result of treatment status but did see a strong effect of farm origin. Network analysis of co-occurrence of microbiome and resistome data suggested that some resistance genes may be transferred through mobile genetic elements, so we used Hi-C metagenomics on a subset of samples to investigate this. We conclude that antibiotic treatment has a differential effect on the microbiome vs. the resistome and that although resistance gene load is increased by antibiotic treatment load, this effect disappears before slaughter. More studies are needed to elucidate the optimal way to rear pigs without antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diet affects reproductive development and microbiota composition in honey bees. The role of gut microbiota in a generalist, golden snub-nosed monkey, adaptation to geographical diet change. Insights into the occurrence of phylosymbiosis and co-phylogeny in the holobionts of octocorals from the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea. Programming rumen microbiome development in calves with the anti-methanogenic compound 3-NOP. Ruminant microbiome data are skewed and unFAIR, undermining their usefulness for sustainable production improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1