通过数字减影血管造影引导静脉造影诊断下肢静脉复制的价值。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1177/15385744231198355
Ming Tang, Weijian Fan, Jianwei Cui, Qingling Liu, Xindong Chang, Mingfei He, Qingqing Fang, Siyuan Wang, Mianpeng Chen, Shiwu Yin
{"title":"通过数字减影血管造影引导静脉造影诊断下肢静脉复制的价值。","authors":"Ming Tang, Weijian Fan, Jianwei Cui, Qingling Liu, Xindong Chang, Mingfei He, Qingqing Fang, Siyuan Wang, Mianpeng Chen, Shiwu Yin","doi":"10.1177/15385744231198355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower limb venous anomalies, including duplicated veins, are common and have significant impacts on the outcomes and efficacy of venous surgery. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) guided venography, serving as the tertiary diagnostic option for venous disorders, offers valuable informations to clinical practitioners.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 195 patients with suspected venous disease, evaluating 259 limbs with venography imaging. Two experienced interventional vascularists evaluated the images to determine the incidence and characteristics of variances in the femoral, popliteal, great saphenous, and small saphenous veins. Moreover, blood samples were collected to assess the safety of the venography procedure by monitoring changes in renal function.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Duplication variations were found in the lower limb veins, with the highest prevalence in the femoral vein (11.28%, 22/195), followed by the great saphenous vein (4.1%, 8/195), and the popliteal vein (1.54%, 3/195). No severe contrast agent allergies or postoperative complications were reported. No statistically significant differences were found in creatinine and urea levels pre- and post-operation for patients without duplication variations, those with duplication of the great saphenous, femoral, or popliteal vein (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSA-guided venography is effective in identifying venous variations in lower limb disease. DFV is the most common recurrent vein, while DPV is the least. Adequate preparation ensures safety, high spatial resolution, dynamic imaging, and low tissue interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Lower Extremity Venous Duplication via Digital Subtraction Angiography Guided Venography.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Tang, Weijian Fan, Jianwei Cui, Qingling Liu, Xindong Chang, Mingfei He, Qingqing Fang, Siyuan Wang, Mianpeng Chen, Shiwu Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744231198355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower limb venous anomalies, including duplicated veins, are common and have significant impacts on the outcomes and efficacy of venous surgery. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) guided venography, serving as the tertiary diagnostic option for venous disorders, offers valuable informations to clinical practitioners.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 195 patients with suspected venous disease, evaluating 259 limbs with venography imaging. Two experienced interventional vascularists evaluated the images to determine the incidence and characteristics of variances in the femoral, popliteal, great saphenous, and small saphenous veins. Moreover, blood samples were collected to assess the safety of the venography procedure by monitoring changes in renal function.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Duplication variations were found in the lower limb veins, with the highest prevalence in the femoral vein (11.28%, 22/195), followed by the great saphenous vein (4.1%, 8/195), and the popliteal vein (1.54%, 3/195). No severe contrast agent allergies or postoperative complications were reported. No statistically significant differences were found in creatinine and urea levels pre- and post-operation for patients without duplication variations, those with duplication of the great saphenous, femoral, or popliteal vein (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSA-guided venography is effective in identifying venous variations in lower limb disease. DFV is the most common recurrent vein, while DPV is the least. Adequate preparation ensures safety, high spatial resolution, dynamic imaging, and low tissue interference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231198355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231198355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:下肢静脉异常(包括重复静脉)很常见,对静脉手术的结果和疗效有重大影响。数字减影血管造影术(DSA)引导下的静脉造影术作为静脉疾病的三级诊断选择,为临床医师提供了宝贵的信息:我们对 195 名疑似静脉疾病患者进行了回顾性研究,对 259 条肢体进行了静脉造影成像评估。两名经验丰富的介入血管专家对图像进行了评估,以确定股静脉、腘静脉、大隐静脉和小隐静脉变异的发生率和特征。此外,还采集了血液样本,通过监测肾功能的变化来评估静脉造影术的安全性:结果:在下肢静脉中发现了重复变异,其中股静脉的重复率最高(11.28%,22/195),其次是大隐静脉(4.1%,8/195)和腘静脉(1.54%,3/195)。没有严重造影剂过敏或术后并发症的报告。无重复变异、大隐静脉、股静脉或腘静脉重复的患者术前和术后的肌酐和尿素水平差异无统计学意义(P < .05):结论:DSA引导下的静脉造影能有效识别下肢疾病中的静脉变异。DFV是最常见的复发性静脉,而DPV则最少见。充分的准备可确保安全、高空间分辨率、动态成像和低组织干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of Lower Extremity Venous Duplication via Digital Subtraction Angiography Guided Venography.

Introduction: Lower limb venous anomalies, including duplicated veins, are common and have significant impacts on the outcomes and efficacy of venous surgery. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) guided venography, serving as the tertiary diagnostic option for venous disorders, offers valuable informations to clinical practitioners.

Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 195 patients with suspected venous disease, evaluating 259 limbs with venography imaging. Two experienced interventional vascularists evaluated the images to determine the incidence and characteristics of variances in the femoral, popliteal, great saphenous, and small saphenous veins. Moreover, blood samples were collected to assess the safety of the venography procedure by monitoring changes in renal function.

Result: Duplication variations were found in the lower limb veins, with the highest prevalence in the femoral vein (11.28%, 22/195), followed by the great saphenous vein (4.1%, 8/195), and the popliteal vein (1.54%, 3/195). No severe contrast agent allergies or postoperative complications were reported. No statistically significant differences were found in creatinine and urea levels pre- and post-operation for patients without duplication variations, those with duplication of the great saphenous, femoral, or popliteal vein (P < .05).

Conclusion: DSA-guided venography is effective in identifying venous variations in lower limb disease. DFV is the most common recurrent vein, while DPV is the least. Adequate preparation ensures safety, high spatial resolution, dynamic imaging, and low tissue interference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery SURGERY-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Persistent Sciatic Artery Aneurysm With Distal Embolization Treated Endovascular - A Case Report A Prosthetic Conduit can be Used Safely for TransCarotid Artery Revascularization Under Local Anesthesia in High-Risk Patients A Rare Case of Pulmonary Artery Trunk Aneurysm Bow Hunter Phenomenon From Advanced Cerebrovascular Disease Treated With Subclavian Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy Abernethy Malformation and Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1