低资源环境下COVID-19大流行期间急诊剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率和结局:一项回顾性队列研究

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijso.2023.100641
Jethro Atumanyire , Joshua Muhumuza , Nelson Talemwa , Selamo Fabrice Molen , Stephen Mbae Kithinji , ByaMungu Pahari Kagenderezo , Theoneste Hakizimana
{"title":"低资源环境下COVID-19大流行期间急诊剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率和结局:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jethro Atumanyire ,&nbsp;Joshua Muhumuza ,&nbsp;Nelson Talemwa ,&nbsp;Selamo Fabrice Molen ,&nbsp;Stephen Mbae Kithinji ,&nbsp;ByaMungu Pahari Kagenderezo ,&nbsp;Theoneste Hakizimana","doi":"10.1016/j.ijso.2023.100641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest form of hospital acquired infection in sub-Saharan Africa, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study was aimed at determining the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection following emergency laparotomy during the COVID -19 pandemic in a low resource setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective single Centre cohort of patients that had emergency laparotomy between July 2021–June 2022 (COVID period) and July 2018–June 2019 (pre-COVID period). Analysis was done using SPSS version 22 in which SSI rates were compared between the two periods using the chi squared test. Mortality, re-operation rates and length of hospital stay were also compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 453 patient files included in analysis, 244 (53.9%) were for the COVID period, while 209 (46.1%) were for the pre COVID period. The incidence of SSI was insignificantly higher in the COVID period (17.6% versus 16.7%; P = 0.901). Mortality was also insignificantly higher in the SSI group (3.8% versus 3.5%; P = 0.745). Presence of surgical site infection increased the risk for re-operation (P &lt; 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection appear not to have changed following the pandemic, the same measures that were previously used to prevent SSI could still be effective even during the pandemic if followed appropriately and combined with the COVID specific peri-operative care recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection following emergency laparotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a low resource setting: A retrospective cohort\",\"authors\":\"Jethro Atumanyire ,&nbsp;Joshua Muhumuza ,&nbsp;Nelson Talemwa ,&nbsp;Selamo Fabrice Molen ,&nbsp;Stephen Mbae Kithinji ,&nbsp;ByaMungu Pahari Kagenderezo ,&nbsp;Theoneste Hakizimana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijso.2023.100641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest form of hospital acquired infection in sub-Saharan Africa, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study was aimed at determining the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection following emergency laparotomy during the COVID -19 pandemic in a low resource setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective single Centre cohort of patients that had emergency laparotomy between July 2021–June 2022 (COVID period) and July 2018–June 2019 (pre-COVID period). Analysis was done using SPSS version 22 in which SSI rates were compared between the two periods using the chi squared test. Mortality, re-operation rates and length of hospital stay were also compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 453 patient files included in analysis, 244 (53.9%) were for the COVID period, while 209 (46.1%) were for the pre COVID period. The incidence of SSI was insignificantly higher in the COVID period (17.6% versus 16.7%; P = 0.901). Mortality was also insignificantly higher in the SSI group (3.8% versus 3.5%; P = 0.745). Presence of surgical site infection increased the risk for re-operation (P &lt; 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection appear not to have changed following the pandemic, the same measures that were previously used to prevent SSI could still be effective even during the pandemic if followed appropriately and combined with the COVID specific peri-operative care recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405857223000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405857223000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术部位感染(SSI)是撒哈拉以南非洲地区最常见的医院获得性感染,与发病率和死亡率增加有关。本研究旨在确定低资源环境下COVID -19大流行期间急诊剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率和结局。方法本研究是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,纳入了2021年7月至2022年6月(新冠肺炎期间)和2018年7月至2019年6月(新冠肺炎前期)期间急诊剖腹手术的患者。使用SPSS版本22进行分析,其中使用卡方检验比较两个时期之间的SSI率。比较两组患者的死亡率、再手术率和住院时间。结果纳入分析的453例患者档案中,244例(53.9%)为新冠肺炎期间,209例(46.1%)为新冠肺炎前期。在新冠肺炎期间,SSI的发生率无显著性升高(17.6%比16.7%;p = 0.901)。SSI组的死亡率也不显著升高(3.8% vs 3.5%;p = 0.745)。手术部位感染增加了再次手术的风险(P <0.001)和住院时间延长(P <0.001)。结论由于手术部位感染的发生率和结果在大流行后似乎没有改变,因此,如果适当遵循并结合针对COVID的围手术期护理建议,以前用于预防SSI的相同措施即使在大流行期间仍然有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection following emergency laparotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a low resource setting: A retrospective cohort

Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest form of hospital acquired infection in sub-Saharan Africa, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study was aimed at determining the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection following emergency laparotomy during the COVID -19 pandemic in a low resource setting.

Methods

This was a retrospective single Centre cohort of patients that had emergency laparotomy between July 2021–June 2022 (COVID period) and July 2018–June 2019 (pre-COVID period). Analysis was done using SPSS version 22 in which SSI rates were compared between the two periods using the chi squared test. Mortality, re-operation rates and length of hospital stay were also compared.

Results

Of the 453 patient files included in analysis, 244 (53.9%) were for the COVID period, while 209 (46.1%) were for the pre COVID period. The incidence of SSI was insignificantly higher in the COVID period (17.6% versus 16.7%; P = 0.901). Mortality was also insignificantly higher in the SSI group (3.8% versus 3.5%; P = 0.745). Presence of surgical site infection increased the risk for re-operation (P < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Since the incidence and outcomes of surgical site infection appear not to have changed following the pandemic, the same measures that were previously used to prevent SSI could still be effective even during the pandemic if followed appropriately and combined with the COVID specific peri-operative care recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1