Guneet S Sodhi, Nakul Singh, Jacquelyn Wrenn, Arun D Singh
{"title":"周围出血性脉络膜视网膜病变:与脉络膜黑色素瘤的鉴别特征。","authors":"Guneet S Sodhi, Nakul Singh, Jacquelyn Wrenn, Arun D Singh","doi":"10.1159/000528663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is one of the leading mimickers of choroidal melanoma because of overlapping features with choroidal melanoma that make the distinction between these two entities difficult.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify nonoverlapping diagnostic features between PEHCR and choroidal melanoma, a retrospective study of 80 patients (80 eyes); 40 patients (40 eyes) with PEHCR; and 40 patients (40 eyes) with choroidal melanoma was conducted. Ophthalmoscopic and imaging features of PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were compared. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were calculated. Youden's J statistic was assessed for each diagnostic feature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent clinical features of PEHCR were presence of druse (100%), hemorrhagic PED (93%), dome-shaped mass (B-scan) (90%), and subretinal/intraretinal hemorrhage (78%). Statistical analysis confirmed high sensitivity of hemorrhagic PED (0.93; 95% CI 0.80-0.98) and high specificity of clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) as diagnostic features of PEHCR. Statistical analysis revealed presence of subretinal fluid 0.80 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) was most sensitive and presence of orange pigment, mushroom shape on B-scan, ciliary body extension, and choroidal excavation were most specific (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) for choroidal melanoma. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of PEHCR were hemorrhagic PED, clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality. All PEHCR patients (100%) had at least one of these nonoverlapping diagnostic features. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of choroidal melanoma were the presence of orange pigment, choroidal excavation, mushroom-shaped mass, and ciliary body extension (the latter 3 detected on B-scan). Youden's J statistic was highest for hemorrhagic PED and lowest for dome-shape appearance on B-scan (0.075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEHCR and choroidal melanoma can be differentiated by identifying diagnostic features that are exclusive to each entity. The presence of hemorrhagic PED strongly supports a diagnosis of PEHCR. B-scan ultrasonography is required to detect a mushroom-shaped mass, choroidal excavation, or ciliary body extension to exclude underlying choroidal melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral Hemorrhagic Chorioretinopathy: Differentiating Features from Choroidal Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Guneet S Sodhi, Nakul Singh, Jacquelyn Wrenn, Arun D Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000528663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is one of the leading mimickers of choroidal melanoma because of overlapping features with choroidal melanoma that make the distinction between these two entities difficult.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify nonoverlapping diagnostic features between PEHCR and choroidal melanoma, a retrospective study of 80 patients (80 eyes); 40 patients (40 eyes) with PEHCR; and 40 patients (40 eyes) with choroidal melanoma was conducted. Ophthalmoscopic and imaging features of PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were compared. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were calculated. Youden's J statistic was assessed for each diagnostic feature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent clinical features of PEHCR were presence of druse (100%), hemorrhagic PED (93%), dome-shaped mass (B-scan) (90%), and subretinal/intraretinal hemorrhage (78%). Statistical analysis confirmed high sensitivity of hemorrhagic PED (0.93; 95% CI 0.80-0.98) and high specificity of clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) as diagnostic features of PEHCR. Statistical analysis revealed presence of subretinal fluid 0.80 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) was most sensitive and presence of orange pigment, mushroom shape on B-scan, ciliary body extension, and choroidal excavation were most specific (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) for choroidal melanoma. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of PEHCR were hemorrhagic PED, clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality. All PEHCR patients (100%) had at least one of these nonoverlapping diagnostic features. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of choroidal melanoma were the presence of orange pigment, choroidal excavation, mushroom-shaped mass, and ciliary body extension (the latter 3 detected on B-scan). Youden's J statistic was highest for hemorrhagic PED and lowest for dome-shape appearance on B-scan (0.075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEHCR and choroidal melanoma can be differentiated by identifying diagnostic features that are exclusive to each entity. The presence of hemorrhagic PED strongly supports a diagnosis of PEHCR. B-scan ultrasonography is required to detect a mushroom-shaped mass, choroidal excavation, or ciliary body extension to exclude underlying choroidal melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:外周渗出性出血性脉络膜视网膜病变(PEHCR)是脉络膜黑色素瘤的主要模仿者之一,因为它与脉络膜黑色素瘤的特征重叠,使这两种实体难以区分:为了确定 PEHCR 和脉络膜黑色素瘤之间不重叠的诊断特征,我们对 80 名患者(80 只眼)、40 名 PEHCR 患者(40 只眼)和 40 名脉络膜黑色素瘤患者(40 只眼)进行了回顾性研究。研究人员比较了 PEHCR 和脉络膜黑色素瘤的眼科和影像学特征。计算了识别 PEHCR 和脉络膜黑色素瘤的敏感性和特异性。评估了每个诊断特征的 Youden's J 统计量:结果:PEHCR 最常见的临床特征是存在穹隆(100%)、出血性 PED(93%)、圆顶形肿块(B-扫描)(90%)和视网膜下/视网膜内出血(78%)。统计分析证实,出血性 PED 的灵敏度高(0.93;95% CI 0.80-0.98),血块回缩裂隙、存在脂质渗出和双侧性的特异性高(1.00;95% CI 0.91-1.00),是 PEHCR 的诊断特征。统计分析显示,视网膜下积液(0.80 (95% CI 0.54-0.91))对脉络膜黑色素瘤的敏感性最高,而橙色色素、B 扫描蘑菇状、睫状体延伸和脉络膜挖空对脉络膜黑色素瘤的特异性最高(1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00)。出血性 PED、血块回缩裂隙、脂质渗出和双侧性是 PEHCR 的非重叠诊断特征。所有 PEHCR 患者(100%)至少具有其中一个非重叠诊断特征。脉络膜黑色素瘤的非重叠诊断特征是存在橙色色素、脉络膜挖空、蘑菇状肿块和睫状体扩展(后三者在 B 型扫描中检测到)。Youden's J统计量最高的是出血性PED,最低的是B扫描上的穹顶形外观(0.075):结论:PEHCR 和脉络膜黑色素瘤可通过识别各自独有的诊断特征加以区分。出血性 PED 的存在强烈支持 PEHCR 的诊断。B扫描超声波检查需要检测蘑菇状肿块、脉络膜挖空或睫状体扩展,以排除潜在的脉络膜黑色素瘤。
Peripheral Hemorrhagic Chorioretinopathy: Differentiating Features from Choroidal Melanoma.
Introduction: Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is one of the leading mimickers of choroidal melanoma because of overlapping features with choroidal melanoma that make the distinction between these two entities difficult.
Methods: To identify nonoverlapping diagnostic features between PEHCR and choroidal melanoma, a retrospective study of 80 patients (80 eyes); 40 patients (40 eyes) with PEHCR; and 40 patients (40 eyes) with choroidal melanoma was conducted. Ophthalmoscopic and imaging features of PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were compared. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were calculated. Youden's J statistic was assessed for each diagnostic feature.
Results: The most frequent clinical features of PEHCR were presence of druse (100%), hemorrhagic PED (93%), dome-shaped mass (B-scan) (90%), and subretinal/intraretinal hemorrhage (78%). Statistical analysis confirmed high sensitivity of hemorrhagic PED (0.93; 95% CI 0.80-0.98) and high specificity of clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) as diagnostic features of PEHCR. Statistical analysis revealed presence of subretinal fluid 0.80 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) was most sensitive and presence of orange pigment, mushroom shape on B-scan, ciliary body extension, and choroidal excavation were most specific (1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.00) for choroidal melanoma. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of PEHCR were hemorrhagic PED, clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality. All PEHCR patients (100%) had at least one of these nonoverlapping diagnostic features. Nonoverlapping diagnostic features of choroidal melanoma were the presence of orange pigment, choroidal excavation, mushroom-shaped mass, and ciliary body extension (the latter 3 detected on B-scan). Youden's J statistic was highest for hemorrhagic PED and lowest for dome-shape appearance on B-scan (0.075).
Conclusion: PEHCR and choroidal melanoma can be differentiated by identifying diagnostic features that are exclusive to each entity. The presence of hemorrhagic PED strongly supports a diagnosis of PEHCR. B-scan ultrasonography is required to detect a mushroom-shaped mass, choroidal excavation, or ciliary body extension to exclude underlying choroidal melanoma.