基于社区的参与式研究,改善校友从针对历史上未被充分代表的本科生的强化研究培训计划中的过渡。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449
Dora M Raymaker, Mirah Scharer, Rebecca Miller, Ashley Widmer, Dhale Larsen Posadas, Thomas E Keller
{"title":"基于社区的参与式研究,改善校友从针对历史上未被充分代表的本科生的强化研究培训计划中的过渡。","authors":"Dora M Raymaker, Mirah Scharer, Rebecca Miller, Ashley Widmer, Dhale Larsen Posadas, Thomas E Keller","doi":"10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various initiatives for undergraduates from historically underrepresented backgrounds attempt to address disparities in the completion of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) degrees and the pursuit of careers in scientific research. Intensive research training programs for historically underrepresented undergraduates may include multiple components, such as authentic research experiences, advising and mentoring, supplemental curriculum, and financial assistance. Following comprehensive support during program participation, the post-program transition may present a vulnerable period in students' career trajectories. This study used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to investigate the experiences of students completing an intensive research training program to understand and develop recommendations for the post-program transition process. As a team of program alumni, academic researchers, and program staff, we developed, conducted, and analyzed semi-structured, open-ended interviews of recent program alumni and students approaching program completion (n=11; 55% female, 55% non-White). Applying thematic analysis at semantic and latent levels through a critical paradigm revealed the transition as a bittersweet experience, with feelings of pride and accomplishment mixed with sadness and anxiety. Findings also suggested the transition is described as a narrative influenced by preceding program experiences and adaptations. Financial concerns were prominent, and specific barriers and facilitators of successful transition included: aligned mentoring, negotiation of continued research employment, consideration of culture, planning for next steps, and engagement with the scholar community. Collaboratively, we developed recommendations for program improvements potentially relevant to similarly intensive STEM diversity programs. We also highlight the value of a CBPR approach that includes students equitably as co-researchers in program research and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434840/pdf/nihms-1915810.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-based participatory research to improve alumni transition from an intensive research training program for historically underrepresented undergraduates.\",\"authors\":\"Dora M Raymaker, Mirah Scharer, Rebecca Miller, Ashley Widmer, Dhale Larsen Posadas, Thomas E Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Various initiatives for undergraduates from historically underrepresented backgrounds attempt to address disparities in the completion of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) degrees and the pursuit of careers in scientific research. Intensive research training programs for historically underrepresented undergraduates may include multiple components, such as authentic research experiences, advising and mentoring, supplemental curriculum, and financial assistance. Following comprehensive support during program participation, the post-program transition may present a vulnerable period in students' career trajectories. This study used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to investigate the experiences of students completing an intensive research training program to understand and develop recommendations for the post-program transition process. As a team of program alumni, academic researchers, and program staff, we developed, conducted, and analyzed semi-structured, open-ended interviews of recent program alumni and students approaching program completion (n=11; 55% female, 55% non-White). Applying thematic analysis at semantic and latent levels through a critical paradigm revealed the transition as a bittersweet experience, with feelings of pride and accomplishment mixed with sadness and anxiety. Findings also suggested the transition is described as a narrative influenced by preceding program experiences and adaptations. Financial concerns were prominent, and specific barriers and facilitators of successful transition included: aligned mentoring, negotiation of continued research employment, consideration of culture, planning for next steps, and engagement with the scholar community. Collaboratively, we developed recommendations for program improvements potentially relevant to similarly intensive STEM diversity programs. We also highlight the value of a CBPR approach that includes students equitably as co-researchers in program research and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434840/pdf/nihms-1915810.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对历史上未被充分代表的本科生的各种计划试图解决他们在完成科学、技术、工程、数学(STEM)学位和从事科学研究方面的差距。针对历史上未被充分代表的本科生的强化研究培训计划可能包括多个组成部分,如真实的研究经历、咨询和指导、补充课程和经济援助。在参与计划期间获得全面支持后,计划结束后的过渡时期可能是学生职业轨迹中的脆弱时期。本研究采用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法,调查完成强化研究培训项目的学生的经历,以了解项目后的过渡过程并提出建议。作为一个由项目校友、学术研究人员和项目工作人员组成的团队,我们对近期项目校友和即将完成项目的学生(人数=11;55%为女性,55%为非白人)进行了半结构化、开放式访谈,并对访谈内容进行了分析。通过批判范式在语义和潜意识层面进行主题分析,发现过渡是一种苦乐参半的经历,自豪感和成就感与悲伤和焦虑交织在一起。研究结果还表明,过渡被描述为一种受先前项目经验和适应性影响的叙述。财务问题非常突出,成功过渡的具体障碍和促进因素包括:统一的指导、继续从事研究工作的协商、文化考虑、下一步计划以及与学者社区的接触。通过合作,我们提出了可能适用于类似密集型 STEM 多元化项目的项目改进建议。我们还强调了 CBPR 方法的价值,该方法将学生公平地作为共同研究者纳入项目研究和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community-based participatory research to improve alumni transition from an intensive research training program for historically underrepresented undergraduates.

Various initiatives for undergraduates from historically underrepresented backgrounds attempt to address disparities in the completion of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) degrees and the pursuit of careers in scientific research. Intensive research training programs for historically underrepresented undergraduates may include multiple components, such as authentic research experiences, advising and mentoring, supplemental curriculum, and financial assistance. Following comprehensive support during program participation, the post-program transition may present a vulnerable period in students' career trajectories. This study used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to investigate the experiences of students completing an intensive research training program to understand and develop recommendations for the post-program transition process. As a team of program alumni, academic researchers, and program staff, we developed, conducted, and analyzed semi-structured, open-ended interviews of recent program alumni and students approaching program completion (n=11; 55% female, 55% non-White). Applying thematic analysis at semantic and latent levels through a critical paradigm revealed the transition as a bittersweet experience, with feelings of pride and accomplishment mixed with sadness and anxiety. Findings also suggested the transition is described as a narrative influenced by preceding program experiences and adaptations. Financial concerns were prominent, and specific barriers and facilitators of successful transition included: aligned mentoring, negotiation of continued research employment, consideration of culture, planning for next steps, and engagement with the scholar community. Collaboratively, we developed recommendations for program improvements potentially relevant to similarly intensive STEM diversity programs. We also highlight the value of a CBPR approach that includes students equitably as co-researchers in program research and evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering (JWM) publishes original, peer-reviewed papers that report on empirical investigations covering a variety of topics related to achieving inclusion of historically underrepresented and minoritized populations in science and engineering education, academe, and professional practice. These populations include those who identify as people of color, white women, first generation college students, veterans, members of the LGBTQ+ community, people with disabilities, and the intersections of these and other identities. The journal especially welcomes research manuscripts that use theoretical frameworks and methodologies appropriate to the study of underrepresented and marginalized populations and/or use intersectional approaches. The journal also publishes studies on novel educational innovations that hold promise for transferability to other contexts.
期刊最新文献
Community-based participatory research to improve alumni transition from an intensive research training program for historically underrepresented undergraduates. The Determinants of Wages Among Black Males in Non-STEM and STEM Occupations Themed Issue: Black Males in STEM – Aspiring to the Road Less Traveled: Factors Influencing Black Males Pursuits of Engineering Graduate Degrees Black Males in STEM: Exploring Future Engineering Graduate School Aspirations of Undergraduate Black Men Themed Issue: Black Males in STEM: The [NAME OF STEM SUMMER PROGRAM] Way: From STEM Summer Program Participants to Professors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1