检视元认知信念与II型担忧之间的关联:负面元认知信念对焦虑发作期间II型担忧状态的特异性

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1891/JCP-2022-0026
Thomas A Fergus, Katherine E Stratton
{"title":"检视元认知信念与II型担忧之间的关联:负面元认知信念对焦虑发作期间II型担忧状态的特异性","authors":"Thomas A Fergus,&nbsp;Katherine E Stratton","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The metacognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) considers Type II worry, which represents one's tendency to negatively appraise worry, as a defining feature of GAD, and negative metacognitive beliefs are central to eliciting Type II worry during worry episodes. Extant research has found that individuals experiencing GAD report elevated Type II worry, and that negative metacognitive beliefs correlate with Type II worry. However, because of how Type II worry was assessed in existing studies, it remains unclear if negative metacognitive beliefs relate to state Type II worry specifically during a worry episode. This study sought to fill that gap in the existing literature among a sample of individuals experiencing elevated GAD symptom severity (<i>N</i> = 106). Participants completed an assessment of GAD symptom severity and metacognitive beliefs, while later attending an in-person study session where they completed a worry induction and state Type II worry, as conceptualized as the strength of negative appraisals of worry, which was then assessed. Metacognitive beliefs generally positively correlated with state Type II worry, with negative metacognitive beliefs being the only metacognitive belief domain that correlated with state Type II worry in multivariate analyses. Implications for how these results support the metacognitive model of GAD and treatment implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Associations Between Metacognitive Beliefs and Type II Worry: The Specificity of Negative Metacognitive Beliefs to State Type II Worry During a Worry Episode.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Fergus,&nbsp;Katherine E Stratton\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JCP-2022-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The metacognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) considers Type II worry, which represents one's tendency to negatively appraise worry, as a defining feature of GAD, and negative metacognitive beliefs are central to eliciting Type II worry during worry episodes. Extant research has found that individuals experiencing GAD report elevated Type II worry, and that negative metacognitive beliefs correlate with Type II worry. However, because of how Type II worry was assessed in existing studies, it remains unclear if negative metacognitive beliefs relate to state Type II worry specifically during a worry episode. This study sought to fill that gap in the existing literature among a sample of individuals experiencing elevated GAD symptom severity (<i>N</i> = 106). Participants completed an assessment of GAD symptom severity and metacognitive beliefs, while later attending an in-person study session where they completed a worry induction and state Type II worry, as conceptualized as the strength of negative appraisals of worry, which was then assessed. Metacognitive beliefs generally positively correlated with state Type II worry, with negative metacognitive beliefs being the only metacognitive belief domain that correlated with state Type II worry in multivariate analyses. Implications for how these results support the metacognitive model of GAD and treatment implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2022-0026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2022-0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的元认知模型认为II型担忧是GAD的一个定义特征,它代表了一个人对担忧的负面评价倾向,而消极的元认知信念是焦虑发作期间引发II型担忧的核心。现有的研究发现,患有广泛性焦虑症的个体报告II型担忧升高,而消极的元认知信念与II型担忧相关。然而,由于现有研究对II型担忧的评估方式,目前尚不清楚消极的元认知信念是否与焦虑发作期间的II型担忧状态有关。本研究试图在经历GAD症状严重程度升高的个体样本(N = 106)中填补现有文献中的空白。参与者完成了对广泛性焦虑症症状严重程度和元认知信念的评估,随后参加了一个面对面的学习会议,在那里他们完成了担忧诱导和II型担忧状态,概念化为对担忧的负面评价的强度,然后对其进行评估。多元分析显示,元认知信念与状态ⅱ型担忧普遍呈正相关,负性元认知信念是唯一与状态ⅱ型担忧相关的元认知信念域。讨论了这些结果如何支持广泛性焦虑症的元认知模型和治疗意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Associations Between Metacognitive Beliefs and Type II Worry: The Specificity of Negative Metacognitive Beliefs to State Type II Worry During a Worry Episode.

The metacognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) considers Type II worry, which represents one's tendency to negatively appraise worry, as a defining feature of GAD, and negative metacognitive beliefs are central to eliciting Type II worry during worry episodes. Extant research has found that individuals experiencing GAD report elevated Type II worry, and that negative metacognitive beliefs correlate with Type II worry. However, because of how Type II worry was assessed in existing studies, it remains unclear if negative metacognitive beliefs relate to state Type II worry specifically during a worry episode. This study sought to fill that gap in the existing literature among a sample of individuals experiencing elevated GAD symptom severity (N = 106). Participants completed an assessment of GAD symptom severity and metacognitive beliefs, while later attending an in-person study session where they completed a worry induction and state Type II worry, as conceptualized as the strength of negative appraisals of worry, which was then assessed. Metacognitive beliefs generally positively correlated with state Type II worry, with negative metacognitive beliefs being the only metacognitive belief domain that correlated with state Type II worry in multivariate analyses. Implications for how these results support the metacognitive model of GAD and treatment implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Incremental Predictive Validity of Self-as-Context-Related Measures. Less Might Not Be More, but May Be Enough for Some. The Measurement of Reactions to Face Masks and the Relation to Social Anxiety. Further Examining Positive Affect in Relation to Worry: A Synergistic Effect Between Positive Affect Expressivity and Proneness to Positive Affect. The Role of Self-Compassion and Social Anxiety in the Relationship Between Cognitive Distortions and Emotional Eating.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1