Arvina Rajasekar, Pratebha Balu, Saravana R Kumar, Sheeja S Varghese
{"title":"16S rRNA基因测序法比较天然牙与种植牙的微生物组成。","authors":"Arvina Rajasekar, Pratebha Balu, Saravana R Kumar, Sheeja S Varghese","doi":"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exploring variations in the oral microbiome that predict the early stages of oral diseases could lead to more accurate diagnosis and therapy before the disease manifests clinically. This study compared the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in a healthy oral cavity. Fifteen participants with prosthesis on natural teeth and 15 participants with implants were recruited. All participants were periodontally healthy. Plaque samples were collected and then subjected to PCR amplification with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Using the BlastN program, the sequenced data were compared to reference bacterial gene sequences in the Human Oral Microbiome Database. Finally, bacterial species in both groups' samples were identified, and a phylogenetic tree was created to compare the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants. Microorganisms identified were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Micrococcus, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Dechloromonas species; around implants were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Prevotella, Eikenella, Nisseria, Rothia, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Actinomyces species. On comparing the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in periodontally healthy individuals, pathogenic bacterial species including Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and Eikenella corrodens were identified around implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"33 3","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Microbial Composition of Natural Teeth and Implants by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Arvina Rajasekar, Pratebha Balu, Saravana R Kumar, Sheeja S Varghese\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exploring variations in the oral microbiome that predict the early stages of oral diseases could lead to more accurate diagnosis and therapy before the disease manifests clinically. This study compared the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in a healthy oral cavity. Fifteen participants with prosthesis on natural teeth and 15 participants with implants were recruited. All participants were periodontally healthy. Plaque samples were collected and then subjected to PCR amplification with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Using the BlastN program, the sequenced data were compared to reference bacterial gene sequences in the Human Oral Microbiome Database. Finally, bacterial species in both groups' samples were identified, and a phylogenetic tree was created to compare the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants. Microorganisms identified were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Micrococcus, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Dechloromonas species; around implants were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Prevotella, Eikenella, Nisseria, Rothia, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Actinomyces species. On comparing the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in periodontally healthy individuals, pathogenic bacterial species including Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and Eikenella corrodens were identified around implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022044519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Microbial Composition of Natural Teeth and Implants by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Exploring variations in the oral microbiome that predict the early stages of oral diseases could lead to more accurate diagnosis and therapy before the disease manifests clinically. This study compared the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in a healthy oral cavity. Fifteen participants with prosthesis on natural teeth and 15 participants with implants were recruited. All participants were periodontally healthy. Plaque samples were collected and then subjected to PCR amplification with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Using the BlastN program, the sequenced data were compared to reference bacterial gene sequences in the Human Oral Microbiome Database. Finally, bacterial species in both groups' samples were identified, and a phylogenetic tree was created to compare the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants. Microorganisms identified were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Micrococcus, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Dechloromonas species; around implants were Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, Prevotella, Eikenella, Nisseria, Rothia, Aeromonas, Leptotrichia, and Actinomyces species. On comparing the bacterial profile around prosthesis on natural teeth and implants in periodontally healthy individuals, pathogenic bacterial species including Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and Eikenella corrodens were identified around implants.
期刊介绍:
MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.