Pranav Shah , Elias C. Padilha , Rintaro Kato , Vishal B. Siramshetty , Wenwei Huang , Xin Xu
{"title":"考虑肝脏代谢稳定性数据中与供应商有关的差异,优化药物发现中的早期 ADME 筛选。","authors":"Pranav Shah , Elias C. Padilha , Rintaro Kato , Vishal B. Siramshetty , Wenwei Huang , Xin Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.slasd.2023.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatic metabolic stability is a crucial determinant of oral bioavailability and plasma concentrations of a compound, and its measurement is important in early drug discovery. Preliminary metabolic stability estimations are commonly performed in liver microsomal fractions. At the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a single-point assay in rat liver microsomes (RLM) is employed for initial stability assessment (Tier I) and a multi-point detailed stability assay is employed as a Tier II assay for promising compounds. Although the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> metabolic stability of compounds typically exhibit good correlation, conflicting results may arise in certain cases. While investigating one such instance, we serendipitously found vendor-related RLM differences in metabolic stability and metabolite formation, which had implications for <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> correlations. In this study, we highlight the importance of considering vendor differences in hepatic metabolic stability data and discuss strategies to avoid these pitfalls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247255522300059X/pdfft?md5=97f05a382d32c16ef121ece3e85f6f38&pid=1-s2.0-S247255522300059X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of vendor-related differences in hepatic metabolic stability data to optimize early ADME screening in drug discovery\",\"authors\":\"Pranav Shah , Elias C. Padilha , Rintaro Kato , Vishal B. Siramshetty , Wenwei Huang , Xin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.slasd.2023.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hepatic metabolic stability is a crucial determinant of oral bioavailability and plasma concentrations of a compound, and its measurement is important in early drug discovery. Preliminary metabolic stability estimations are commonly performed in liver microsomal fractions. At the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a single-point assay in rat liver microsomes (RLM) is employed for initial stability assessment (Tier I) and a multi-point detailed stability assay is employed as a Tier II assay for promising compounds. Although the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> metabolic stability of compounds typically exhibit good correlation, conflicting results may arise in certain cases. While investigating one such instance, we serendipitously found vendor-related RLM differences in metabolic stability and metabolite formation, which had implications for <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> correlations. In this study, we highlight the importance of considering vendor differences in hepatic metabolic stability data and discuss strategies to avoid these pitfalls.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247255522300059X/pdfft?md5=97f05a382d32c16ef121ece3e85f6f38&pid=1-s2.0-S247255522300059X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247255522300059X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247255522300059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consideration of vendor-related differences in hepatic metabolic stability data to optimize early ADME screening in drug discovery
Hepatic metabolic stability is a crucial determinant of oral bioavailability and plasma concentrations of a compound, and its measurement is important in early drug discovery. Preliminary metabolic stability estimations are commonly performed in liver microsomal fractions. At the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a single-point assay in rat liver microsomes (RLM) is employed for initial stability assessment (Tier I) and a multi-point detailed stability assay is employed as a Tier II assay for promising compounds. Although the in vitro and in vivo metabolic stability of compounds typically exhibit good correlation, conflicting results may arise in certain cases. While investigating one such instance, we serendipitously found vendor-related RLM differences in metabolic stability and metabolite formation, which had implications for in vitro and in vivo correlations. In this study, we highlight the importance of considering vendor differences in hepatic metabolic stability data and discuss strategies to avoid these pitfalls.