基于非超敏 C 反应蛋白/高密度脂蛋白比值的新动脉粥样硬化预测指数

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arteri.2023.07.002
Óscar Fabregat-Andrés , Pilar Pérez-de-Lucía , Victor E. Vallejo-García , Pablo Vera-Ivars , Alfonso A. Valverde-Navarro , José María Tormos
{"title":"基于非超敏 C 反应蛋白/高密度脂蛋白比值的新动脉粥样硬化预测指数","authors":"Óscar Fabregat-Andrés ,&nbsp;Pilar Pérez-de-Lucía ,&nbsp;Victor E. Vallejo-García ,&nbsp;Pablo Vera-Ivars ,&nbsp;Alfonso A. Valverde-Navarro ,&nbsp;José María Tormos","doi":"10.1016/j.arteri.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Current guidelines recommend cardiovascular risk assessment as a preventive measure for cardiovascular diseases, whose fundamental etiology is arteriosclerosis. One of the tools used to estimate risk in clinical practice are atherogenic indices (AI), ratios between lipid fractions with well-established reference ranges. Despite its widespread use, there is still limited information on its clinical utility. In recent years, some research has reinforced the role of inflammation in the etiology and chronicity of the atherosclerotic process. The inclusion of inflammatory parameters in the AI calculation could improve its diagnostic performance in the detection of arteriosclerosis. We sought to evaluate a new AI as a ratio between C-reactive protein (CRP) values and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) values.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 282 asymptomatic patients with no history of cardiovascular disease were included in the study. Laboratory tests with lipid profile and CRP, and carotid ultrasound to assess the presence of atheromatosis were performed in all of them. The new AI is established as the ratio between non-ultrasensitive CRP value in mg/dL (multiplied by 100) and HDL value in mg/dL. It was compared with the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. The optimal cut-off point of the new AI was value<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1 as determined by ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.678 (95% CI 0.60-0.75; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean age of patients was 60.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.5 years. A total of 118 patients (41.8% of total) had carotid arteriosclerosis. When evaluating the diagnostic performance of different AIs, we found that CRP·100/HDL ratio showed the highest values of sensitivity and positive predictive value (0.73 and 0.68, respectively) compared to the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. It was also the only predictor of carotid atheromatosis both when considering its values quantitatively (with OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005), and qualitatively (with OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5-5.5]; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in patients with a CRP·100/HDL ratio<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new PCR·100/HDL index showed the best diagnostic performance in the detection of carotid atheromatosis compared to other classic AIs in this Spanish population of asymptomatic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45230,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nuevo índice aterogénico para la predicción de aterosclerosis carotídea basado en la ratio proteína C reactiva no ultrasensible/HDL\",\"authors\":\"Óscar Fabregat-Andrés ,&nbsp;Pilar Pérez-de-Lucía ,&nbsp;Victor E. Vallejo-García ,&nbsp;Pablo Vera-Ivars ,&nbsp;Alfonso A. Valverde-Navarro ,&nbsp;José María Tormos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arteri.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Current guidelines recommend cardiovascular risk assessment as a preventive measure for cardiovascular diseases, whose fundamental etiology is arteriosclerosis. One of the tools used to estimate risk in clinical practice are atherogenic indices (AI), ratios between lipid fractions with well-established reference ranges. Despite its widespread use, there is still limited information on its clinical utility. In recent years, some research has reinforced the role of inflammation in the etiology and chronicity of the atherosclerotic process. The inclusion of inflammatory parameters in the AI calculation could improve its diagnostic performance in the detection of arteriosclerosis. We sought to evaluate a new AI as a ratio between C-reactive protein (CRP) values and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) values.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 282 asymptomatic patients with no history of cardiovascular disease were included in the study. Laboratory tests with lipid profile and CRP, and carotid ultrasound to assess the presence of atheromatosis were performed in all of them. The new AI is established as the ratio between non-ultrasensitive CRP value in mg/dL (multiplied by 100) and HDL value in mg/dL. It was compared with the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. The optimal cut-off point of the new AI was value<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1 as determined by ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.678 (95% CI 0.60-0.75; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean age of patients was 60.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.5 years. A total of 118 patients (41.8% of total) had carotid arteriosclerosis. When evaluating the diagnostic performance of different AIs, we found that CRP·100/HDL ratio showed the highest values of sensitivity and positive predictive value (0.73 and 0.68, respectively) compared to the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. It was also the only predictor of carotid atheromatosis both when considering its values quantitatively (with OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005), and qualitatively (with OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5-5.5]; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in patients with a CRP·100/HDL ratio<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new PCR·100/HDL index showed the best diagnostic performance in the detection of carotid atheromatosis compared to other classic AIs in this Spanish population of asymptomatic patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 12-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214916823000700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214916823000700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:现行指南建议将心血管风险评估作为心血管疾病的预防措施,而心血管疾病的根本病因是动脉硬化。在临床实践中,用于评估风险的工具之一是致动脉粥样硬化指数(AI),即具有明确参考范围的脂质组分之间的比率。尽管其应用广泛,但有关其临床实用性的信息仍然有限。近年来,一些研究强化了炎症在动脉粥样硬化病因和慢性过程中的作用。将炎症参数纳入 AI 计算可提高其在动脉硬化检测中的诊断性能。我们试图评估一种新的 AI,即 C 反应蛋白(CRP)值与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)值之间的比值。研究共纳入 282 名无症状、无心血管疾病史的患者,对他们全部进行了血脂和 CRP 实验室检测,并进行了颈动脉超声检查以评估是否存在动脉粥样硬化。新的 AI 值是以毫克/分升为单位的非超敏 CRP 值(乘以 100)与以毫克/分升为单位的 HDL 值之间的比值。它与卡斯特里 I 和 II 指数以及血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数进行了比较。结果 患者平均年龄为(60.4 ± 14.5)岁。共有 118 名患者(占总数的 41.8%)患有颈动脉硬化。在评估不同 AI 的诊断性能时,我们发现 CRP-100/HDL 比值的敏感性和阳性预测值(分别为 0.73 和 0.68)与 Castelli I 和 II 指数以及血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数相比最高。从定量(OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7];P = 0.005)和定性(OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5-5.5];P < 0.结论在西班牙无症状患者群体中,与其他经典 AI 相比,新的 PCR-100/HDL 指数在检测颈动脉粥样硬化方面显示出最佳诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nuevo índice aterogénico para la predicción de aterosclerosis carotídea basado en la ratio proteína C reactiva no ultrasensible/HDL

Introduction

Current guidelines recommend cardiovascular risk assessment as a preventive measure for cardiovascular diseases, whose fundamental etiology is arteriosclerosis. One of the tools used to estimate risk in clinical practice are atherogenic indices (AI), ratios between lipid fractions with well-established reference ranges. Despite its widespread use, there is still limited information on its clinical utility. In recent years, some research has reinforced the role of inflammation in the etiology and chronicity of the atherosclerotic process. The inclusion of inflammatory parameters in the AI calculation could improve its diagnostic performance in the detection of arteriosclerosis. We sought to evaluate a new AI as a ratio between C-reactive protein (CRP) values and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) values.

Methods

A total of 282 asymptomatic patients with no history of cardiovascular disease were included in the study. Laboratory tests with lipid profile and CRP, and carotid ultrasound to assess the presence of atheromatosis were performed in all of them. The new AI is established as the ratio between non-ultrasensitive CRP value in mg/dL (multiplied by 100) and HDL value in mg/dL. It was compared with the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. The optimal cut-off point of the new AI was value = 1 as determined by ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.678 (95% CI 0.60-0.75; p < 0.001).

Results

Mean age of patients was 60.4 ± 14.5 years. A total of 118 patients (41.8% of total) had carotid arteriosclerosis. When evaluating the diagnostic performance of different AIs, we found that CRP·100/HDL ratio showed the highest values of sensitivity and positive predictive value (0.73 and 0.68, respectively) compared to the Castelli I and II indices, and the plasma atherogenic index. It was also the only predictor of carotid atheromatosis both when considering its values quantitatively (with OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]; p = 0.005), and qualitatively (with OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5-5.5]; p < 0.001) in patients with a CRP·100/HDL ratio > 1.

Conclusions

The new PCR·100/HDL index showed the best diagnostic performance in the detection of carotid atheromatosis compared to other classic AIs in this Spanish population of asymptomatic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: La publicación idónea para acceder tanto a los últimos originales de investigación como a formación médica continuada sobre la arteriosclerosis y su etiología, epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Además, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis.
期刊最新文献
Severe hypertriglyceridemias: What is necessary and what is sufficient. Recommendations of the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society: The diet in cardiovascular prevention - 2024 Update. Assessment of the impact on thrombogenicity of surface modifications on nitinol stents in an in vitro model. Caracterización clínica y detección de arteriosclerosis subclínica en sujetos con hiperalfalipoproteinemia extrema Dietary plant microRNAs as potential regulators of cellular cholesterol efflux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1