喂养新鲜或冷冻母乳对早产儿肠道微生物群的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1177/10998004231191728
Özlem Selime Merter, Naime Altay
{"title":"喂养新鲜或冷冻母乳对早产儿肠道微生物群的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Özlem Selime Merter, Naime Altay","doi":"10.1177/10998004231191728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast milk is essential for premature infants. It contains a variety of functional and protective nutrients that help to create a suitable microenvironment for intestinal development and maturation. This prospective and observational study was planned to examine the effects of feeding premature infants with fresh or frozen breastmilk on their gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out with a total of 40 infants, with a gestational age of 28-32<sup>6</sup> weeks, fed fresh (<i>n</i> = 20) or frozen (<i>n</i> = 20) breastmilk. Stool samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. Infants were included in groups based on the feed type, which accounted for more than 70% of their 10-day feeding. The Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and t-tests were used to evaluate the demographic data. Stool samples were analyzed by sequencing the V3--V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA for microbiota analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Streptococcus</i> and <i>Enterobacteriales,</i> the majority of which are considered human pathogens, in infants receiving frozen breastmilk (<i>Streptococcus</i> 69%, <i>Enterobacteriales</i> 79%) was higher than that in infants receiving fresh breastmilk (<i>Streptococcus</i> 16%, <i>Enterobacteriales</i> 49%). Further, the <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> species were more abundant in infants who received fresh breastmilk (<i>Lactobacillus</i> 17%, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 12%) than in infants who received frozen breastmilk (<i>Lactobacillus</i> 3%, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, compared to frozen breast milk, fresh breastmilk has an effect on the diversity of preterm infants' gut microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"78-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Feeding Fresh or Frozen Breast Milk on the Gut Microbiota of Premature Infants: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Özlem Selime Merter, Naime Altay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004231191728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast milk is essential for premature infants. It contains a variety of functional and protective nutrients that help to create a suitable microenvironment for intestinal development and maturation. This prospective and observational study was planned to examine the effects of feeding premature infants with fresh or frozen breastmilk on their gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out with a total of 40 infants, with a gestational age of 28-32<sup>6</sup> weeks, fed fresh (<i>n</i> = 20) or frozen (<i>n</i> = 20) breastmilk. Stool samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. Infants were included in groups based on the feed type, which accounted for more than 70% of their 10-day feeding. The Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and t-tests were used to evaluate the demographic data. Stool samples were analyzed by sequencing the V3--V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA for microbiota analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Streptococcus</i> and <i>Enterobacteriales,</i> the majority of which are considered human pathogens, in infants receiving frozen breastmilk (<i>Streptococcus</i> 69%, <i>Enterobacteriales</i> 79%) was higher than that in infants receiving fresh breastmilk (<i>Streptococcus</i> 16%, <i>Enterobacteriales</i> 49%). Further, the <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> species were more abundant in infants who received fresh breastmilk (<i>Lactobacillus</i> 17%, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 12%) than in infants who received frozen breastmilk (<i>Lactobacillus</i> 3%, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> 1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, compared to frozen breast milk, fresh breastmilk has an effect on the diversity of preterm infants' gut microbiota.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"78-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231191728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231191728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:母乳对早产儿至关重要。它含有多种功能性和保护性营养素,有助于为肠道发育和成熟创造合适的微环境。这项前瞻性和观察性研究旨在研究用新鲜或冷冻母乳喂养早产儿对其肠道微生物群的影响。材料与方法:本研究共选取40例胎龄28-326周的婴儿,分别饲喂新鲜母乳(n = 20)和冷冻母乳(n = 20)。粪便样本保存在-80°C直到分析。根据喂养类型将婴儿分组,这占他们10天喂养的70%以上。采用Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验和t检验对人口统计数据进行评价。从提取的DNA中测序16S rRNA基因的V3- V4区域进行微生物群分析,分析粪便样本。结果:冷冻母乳喂养婴儿的链球菌和肠杆菌致病菌(链球菌69%,肠杆菌79%)高于新鲜母乳喂养婴儿(链球菌16%,肠杆菌49%),其中大多数被认为是人类病原体。此外,新鲜母乳喂养的婴儿乳酸菌和双歧杆菌种类(乳酸菌17%,双歧杆菌12%)比冷冻母乳喂养的婴儿(乳酸菌3%,双歧杆菌1%)更丰富。结论:与冷冻母乳相比,新鲜母乳对早产儿肠道菌群多样性有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Feeding Fresh or Frozen Breast Milk on the Gut Microbiota of Premature Infants: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: Breast milk is essential for premature infants. It contains a variety of functional and protective nutrients that help to create a suitable microenvironment for intestinal development and maturation. This prospective and observational study was planned to examine the effects of feeding premature infants with fresh or frozen breastmilk on their gut microbiota.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out with a total of 40 infants, with a gestational age of 28-326 weeks, fed fresh (n = 20) or frozen (n = 20) breastmilk. Stool samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. Infants were included in groups based on the feed type, which accounted for more than 70% of their 10-day feeding. The Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and t-tests were used to evaluate the demographic data. Stool samples were analyzed by sequencing the V3--V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA for microbiota analysis.

Results: Streptococcus and Enterobacteriales, the majority of which are considered human pathogens, in infants receiving frozen breastmilk (Streptococcus 69%, Enterobacteriales 79%) was higher than that in infants receiving fresh breastmilk (Streptococcus 16%, Enterobacteriales 49%). Further, the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species were more abundant in infants who received fresh breastmilk (Lactobacillus 17%, Bifidobacterium 12%) than in infants who received frozen breastmilk (Lactobacillus 3%, Bifidobacterium 1%).

Conclusion: Thus, compared to frozen breast milk, fresh breastmilk has an effect on the diversity of preterm infants' gut microbiota.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic Aging Associations With Psychoneurological Symptoms and Social Functioning in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease Caffeine and Sleep in Preventing Post-spinal Headache: Which One is More Effective? The Impact of Resistance Exercise Training on Glycemic Control Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 2023 International Society of Nurses in Genetics (ISONG) World Congress: Meeting Overview Wii Fit-Based Biofeedback Rehabilitation Among Post-Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1