将社会和生态因素纳入洪泛区搬迁和恢复计划。

Linda Shi, Shanasia Sylman, Carri Hulet, Rebecca Morgenstern Brenner, Amelia Greiner Safi, Paul Corsi
{"title":"将社会和生态因素纳入洪泛区搬迁和恢复计划。","authors":"Linda Shi, Shanasia Sylman, Carri Hulet, Rebecca Morgenstern Brenner, Amelia Greiner Safi, Paul Corsi","doi":"10.1007/s42532-023-00152-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, most floodplain relocation (or buyout) programs focus on moving homeowners, then deal separately with what happens with the land afterward. These programs typically divide processes for relocation planning, engagement, funding, and implementation from those related to post-buyout land management and restoration. The structural and operational conditions that lead to this separation of roles and responsibilities miss out on opportunities to create more synergistic socio-ecological strategies that may produce healthier outcomes for both people and the environment. In other domains, research shows that healthy people and healthy environments can co-create each other through more virtuous cycles. In this perspective essay, we argue that we can better create such virtuous cycles in floodplain relocation programs by integrally considering social and ecological components. Such efforts can encourage more people to decide to relocate, thereby creating more contiguous places to restore. They can also empower more residents to help steward these sites, an action that in turn helps heal and strengthen flood-affected communities. These arguments, while particular to the United States, have resonance for floodplain management and land use planning worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":74830,"journal":{"name":"Socio-ecological practice research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating social and ecological considerations in floodplain relocation and restoration programs.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Shi, Shanasia Sylman, Carri Hulet, Rebecca Morgenstern Brenner, Amelia Greiner Safi, Paul Corsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42532-023-00152-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the United States, most floodplain relocation (or buyout) programs focus on moving homeowners, then deal separately with what happens with the land afterward. These programs typically divide processes for relocation planning, engagement, funding, and implementation from those related to post-buyout land management and restoration. The structural and operational conditions that lead to this separation of roles and responsibilities miss out on opportunities to create more synergistic socio-ecological strategies that may produce healthier outcomes for both people and the environment. In other domains, research shows that healthy people and healthy environments can co-create each other through more virtuous cycles. In this perspective essay, we argue that we can better create such virtuous cycles in floodplain relocation programs by integrally considering social and ecological components. Such efforts can encourage more people to decide to relocate, thereby creating more contiguous places to restore. They can also empower more residents to help steward these sites, an action that in turn helps heal and strengthen flood-affected communities. These arguments, while particular to the United States, have resonance for floodplain management and land use planning worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00152-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-ecological practice research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00152-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,大多数洪泛平原搬迁(或买断)计划都侧重于搬迁房主,然后单独处理之后土地的情况。这些项目通常将搬迁规划、参与、资金和实施流程与收购后土地管理和恢复相关的流程分开。导致这种角色和责任分离的结构和运作条件错过了制定更具协同效应的社会生态战略的机会,这些战略可能会为人类和环境带来更健康的结果。在其他领域,研究表明,健康的人和健康的环境可以通过更良性的循环相互创造。在这篇前瞻性的文章中,我们认为,通过综合考虑社会和生态因素,我们可以在洪泛平原搬迁计划中更好地创造这种良性循环。这样的努力可以鼓励更多的人决定搬迁,从而创造更多相邻的恢复场所。他们还可以让更多的居民帮助管理这些地点,这一行动反过来又有助于治愈和加强受洪水影响的社区。这些论点虽然在美国很特别,但对世界各地的洪泛区管理和土地利用规划都有共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating social and ecological considerations in floodplain relocation and restoration programs.

In the United States, most floodplain relocation (or buyout) programs focus on moving homeowners, then deal separately with what happens with the land afterward. These programs typically divide processes for relocation planning, engagement, funding, and implementation from those related to post-buyout land management and restoration. The structural and operational conditions that lead to this separation of roles and responsibilities miss out on opportunities to create more synergistic socio-ecological strategies that may produce healthier outcomes for both people and the environment. In other domains, research shows that healthy people and healthy environments can co-create each other through more virtuous cycles. In this perspective essay, we argue that we can better create such virtuous cycles in floodplain relocation programs by integrally considering social and ecological components. Such efforts can encourage more people to decide to relocate, thereby creating more contiguous places to restore. They can also empower more residents to help steward these sites, an action that in turn helps heal and strengthen flood-affected communities. These arguments, while particular to the United States, have resonance for floodplain management and land use planning worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An open letter to the United Nations and the SEPR community about pursuing SDGs in the age of democratic backsliding Assessing ecosystem services in wetlands through importance–performance analysis: evidence from lower Gangetic plain region, India Integrating Fail-Safe and Safe-to-Fail practices in resilience planning Transdisciplinary approaches assessing unmanaged urban green spaces reveal benefits for biodiversity and people Nature’s values in marine resource governance: an ethnographic case study of rockweed in Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1