{"title":"医疗保健专业人员的脑电图能力:自我评估与客观测试之间的脱节。","authors":"Elina Linnavuori, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Minna Stolt","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The role of the healthcare professional (HCP) in performing high-quality electroencephalography (EEG) is critical to ensuring accurate results. This study analyzes HCPs' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence to provide information on their EEG competence and competence needs for the development of their education and training. METHODS: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target group of the study was HCPs working in the clinical neurophysiology departments of university hospitals in Finland. The research data were collected using the EEG Competence instrument created for this research. The instrument consisted of a self-assessment section and a knowledge test component. RESULTS: The participants (N = 65; response rate, 81%) consisted of 34 registered nurses and 31 laboratory technologists. In the self-assessment section, the highest mean score was in patient observation (mean, 4.6) and the lowest was in EEG theoretical knowledge (mean, 3.9). In the test section, most of the respondents (73.8%) answered all questions correctly (maximum, 6 points). There was a positive correlation between age, work experience, own satisfaction with EEG competence, and subjective self-assessment. Those familiar with EEG guidelines and who participated in training days assessed their competence as significantly better (P < .05). Respondents who read EEG-related literature on their own identified artifacts better (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory technologists' and registered nurses' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence was high. In the future, the EEG competence instrument should be developed further, and more research is needed to assess its psychometric properties to provide more information on HCPs' competence in the diagnostic process.","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 4","pages":"153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Professionals' Electroencephalography Competency: A Disconnect Between Self-Assessment and Objective Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Elina Linnavuori, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Minna Stolt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The role of the healthcare professional (HCP) in performing high-quality electroencephalography (EEG) is critical to ensuring accurate results. This study analyzes HCPs' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence to provide information on their EEG competence and competence needs for the development of their education and training. METHODS: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target group of the study was HCPs working in the clinical neurophysiology departments of university hospitals in Finland. The research data were collected using the EEG Competence instrument created for this research. The instrument consisted of a self-assessment section and a knowledge test component. RESULTS: The participants (N = 65; response rate, 81%) consisted of 34 registered nurses and 31 laboratory technologists. In the self-assessment section, the highest mean score was in patient observation (mean, 4.6) and the lowest was in EEG theoretical knowledge (mean, 3.9). In the test section, most of the respondents (73.8%) answered all questions correctly (maximum, 6 points). There was a positive correlation between age, work experience, own satisfaction with EEG competence, and subjective self-assessment. Those familiar with EEG guidelines and who participated in training days assessed their competence as significantly better (P < .05). Respondents who read EEG-related literature on their own identified artifacts better (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory technologists' and registered nurses' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence was high. In the future, the EEG competence instrument should be developed further, and more research is needed to assess its psychometric properties to provide more information on HCPs' competence in the diagnostic process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"153-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare Professionals' Electroencephalography Competency: A Disconnect Between Self-Assessment and Objective Testing.
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The role of the healthcare professional (HCP) in performing high-quality electroencephalography (EEG) is critical to ensuring accurate results. This study analyzes HCPs' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence to provide information on their EEG competence and competence needs for the development of their education and training. METHODS: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target group of the study was HCPs working in the clinical neurophysiology departments of university hospitals in Finland. The research data were collected using the EEG Competence instrument created for this research. The instrument consisted of a self-assessment section and a knowledge test component. RESULTS: The participants (N = 65; response rate, 81%) consisted of 34 registered nurses and 31 laboratory technologists. In the self-assessment section, the highest mean score was in patient observation (mean, 4.6) and the lowest was in EEG theoretical knowledge (mean, 3.9). In the test section, most of the respondents (73.8%) answered all questions correctly (maximum, 6 points). There was a positive correlation between age, work experience, own satisfaction with EEG competence, and subjective self-assessment. Those familiar with EEG guidelines and who participated in training days assessed their competence as significantly better (P < .05). Respondents who read EEG-related literature on their own identified artifacts better (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory technologists' and registered nurses' subjectively and objectively assessed EEG competence was high. In the future, the EEG competence instrument should be developed further, and more research is needed to assess its psychometric properties to provide more information on HCPs' competence in the diagnostic process.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team.
The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.