需要轮椅或医疗车帮助的到达病房、动脉氧合指数、年龄、白蛋白和中性粒细胞计数评分:预测中国慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者的住院死亡率。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14799731231197226
Dawei Chen, Caimei Chen, Pan Zhang, Feng Zhang, Hao Zhang, Qing Sun, Jian Sun, Yan Tan, Binbin Pan, Xin Wan
{"title":"需要轮椅或医疗车帮助的到达病房、动脉氧合指数、年龄、白蛋白和中性粒细胞计数评分:预测中国慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者的住院死亡率。","authors":"Dawei Chen,&nbsp;Caimei Chen,&nbsp;Pan Zhang,&nbsp;Feng Zhang,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Qing Sun,&nbsp;Jian Sun,&nbsp;Yan Tan,&nbsp;Binbin Pan,&nbsp;Xin Wan","doi":"10.1177/14799731231197226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we will derive and validate a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death based on Chinese acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Independent predictors of in-hospital death were identified by logistic regression analysis and incorporated into a clinical prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical prediction model was developed with data from 1121 patients and validated with data from 245 patients. The five predictors of in-hospital death from the development cohort (Arrival ward requiring help by wheelchair or medical cart, Arterial oxygenation index, Age, Albumin and Neutrophil count) were combined to form the AAAAN Score. The AAAAN Score achieved good discrimination (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square value was 3.33, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The AAAAN Score, which underwent internal bootstrap validation, also showed excellent discrimination for mortality (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89) and performed more strongly than other clinical prediction tools. Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups based on the scores: low risk (0-2 points, 0.7% in-hospital mortality), intermediate risk (3-4 points, 4.1% in-hospital mortality), and high risk (5-7 points, 23.4% in-hospital mortality). Predictive performance was confirmed by external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AAAAN Score is a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death in Chinese AECOPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"14799731231197226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/8d/10.1177_14799731231197226.PMC10448383.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The arrival ward requiring help by wheelchair or medical cart, arterial oxygenation index, age, albumin and neutrophil count score: Predicting in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"authors\":\"Dawei Chen,&nbsp;Caimei Chen,&nbsp;Pan Zhang,&nbsp;Feng Zhang,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Qing Sun,&nbsp;Jian Sun,&nbsp;Yan Tan,&nbsp;Binbin Pan,&nbsp;Xin Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731231197226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we will derive and validate a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death based on Chinese acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Independent predictors of in-hospital death were identified by logistic regression analysis and incorporated into a clinical prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical prediction model was developed with data from 1121 patients and validated with data from 245 patients. The five predictors of in-hospital death from the development cohort (Arrival ward requiring help by wheelchair or medical cart, Arterial oxygenation index, Age, Albumin and Neutrophil count) were combined to form the AAAAN Score. The AAAAN Score achieved good discrimination (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square value was 3.33, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The AAAAN Score, which underwent internal bootstrap validation, also showed excellent discrimination for mortality (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89) and performed more strongly than other clinical prediction tools. Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups based on the scores: low risk (0-2 points, 0.7% in-hospital mortality), intermediate risk (3-4 points, 4.1% in-hospital mortality), and high risk (5-7 points, 23.4% in-hospital mortality). Predictive performance was confirmed by external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AAAAN Score is a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death in Chinese AECOPD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"14799731231197226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/8d/10.1177_14799731231197226.PMC10448383.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231197226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231197226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在这项研究中,我们将推导并验证一种基于中国慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者的预测住院死亡的预后工具。方法:通过逻辑回归分析确定住院死亡的独立预测因素,并将其纳入临床预测工具。结果:临床预测模型是用1121名患者的数据开发的,并用245名患者的资料进行了验证。将来自发展队列的住院死亡的五个预测因素(需要轮椅或医疗车帮助的到达病房、动脉氧合指数、年龄、白蛋白和中性粒细胞计数)结合起来形成AAAAN评分。AAAAN评分实现了良好的区分(AUC=0.85,95%CI 0.81-0.89)和校准(Hosmer Lemeshow卡方值为3.33,p=0.65)。经过内部引导验证的AAAAN评分也显示出良好的死亡率区分(AUC=0.85,95%CI为0.81至0.89),并且比其他临床预测工具表现得更强。根据评分将患者分为3个风险组:低风险组(0-2分,住院死亡率0.7%)、中风险组(3-4分,住院死亡4.1%)和高风险组(5-7分,住院病死率23.4%)。预测性能已通过外部验证得到确认。结论:AAAAN评分是预测中国AECOPD患者住院死亡的预后工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The arrival ward requiring help by wheelchair or medical cart, arterial oxygenation index, age, albumin and neutrophil count score: Predicting in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: In this study, we will derive and validate a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death based on Chinese acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients.

Methods: Independent predictors of in-hospital death were identified by logistic regression analysis and incorporated into a clinical prediction tool.

Results: The clinical prediction model was developed with data from 1121 patients and validated with data from 245 patients. The five predictors of in-hospital death from the development cohort (Arrival ward requiring help by wheelchair or medical cart, Arterial oxygenation index, Age, Albumin and Neutrophil count) were combined to form the AAAAN Score. The AAAAN Score achieved good discrimination (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square value was 3.33, p = 0.65). The AAAAN Score, which underwent internal bootstrap validation, also showed excellent discrimination for mortality (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89) and performed more strongly than other clinical prediction tools. Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups based on the scores: low risk (0-2 points, 0.7% in-hospital mortality), intermediate risk (3-4 points, 4.1% in-hospital mortality), and high risk (5-7 points, 23.4% in-hospital mortality). Predictive performance was confirmed by external validation.

Conclusions: The AAAAN Score is a prognostic tool to predict in-hospital death in Chinese AECOPD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease known to tertiary care. Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences and self-management approaches adopted by people with interstitial lung disease. Relationship between dust allergen sensitization and cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory impairments in patients suffering from Fabry disease - A cross-sectional study. Two-year diffusion capacity trajectory in COVID-19 pneumonia survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1