生物医学工程临床沉浸式体验调查。

William H Guilford, Miiri Kotche, Rachael H Schmedlen
{"title":"生物医学工程临床沉浸式体验调查。","authors":"William H Guilford, Miiri Kotche, Rachael H Schmedlen","doi":"10.1007/s43683-023-00107-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immersion in clinical environments is generally believed to be a valuable experiential learning opportunity for students in biomedical engineering, both at the undergraduate and the graduate level. Immersion is believed to foster an understanding of medical culture, clinical operations, interprofessional collaboration, and oftentimes allows students to either identify unmet clinical needs. The National Institutes of Health supports efforts through grants to incorporate these clinical immersion programs into biomedical engineering curricula, and this has potentially facilitated an expansion of these programs across the United States. Unknown is how common clinical immersion experiences are in biomedical engineering programs, in general how these are organized and executed, and their goals. We conducted a survey of biomedical engineering programs to learn how many programs offer clinical immersion experiences, over what timeframe and in what formats, and what is known about their goals and learning outcomes. We present here the results of that survey which includes 52 clinical immersion courses and programs, 14 of which either are or were previously funded by the NIH. Each of these courses or programs engages, on average, about 27 students per year, but range in size from 2 to 160. The duration of the immersion experience likewise varies greatly from 3 to 400 h. The objectives of these programs are mostly to identify problems, develop engineering solutions to problems, or to learn clinical procedures. Despite the impressive breadth of experiences revealed by this survey, we still know relatively little about their impact on student learning, motivation, identity, or career path. Desired outcomes and assessment strategies must be better aligned with the structure of the clinical immersion experiences themselves if we are to determine if they are effective in meeting those outcomes, including those of professional preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Clinical Immersion Experiences in Biomedical Engineering.\",\"authors\":\"William H Guilford, Miiri Kotche, Rachael H Schmedlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43683-023-00107-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immersion in clinical environments is generally believed to be a valuable experiential learning opportunity for students in biomedical engineering, both at the undergraduate and the graduate level. Immersion is believed to foster an understanding of medical culture, clinical operations, interprofessional collaboration, and oftentimes allows students to either identify unmet clinical needs. The National Institutes of Health supports efforts through grants to incorporate these clinical immersion programs into biomedical engineering curricula, and this has potentially facilitated an expansion of these programs across the United States. Unknown is how common clinical immersion experiences are in biomedical engineering programs, in general how these are organized and executed, and their goals. We conducted a survey of biomedical engineering programs to learn how many programs offer clinical immersion experiences, over what timeframe and in what formats, and what is known about their goals and learning outcomes. We present here the results of that survey which includes 52 clinical immersion courses and programs, 14 of which either are or were previously funded by the NIH. Each of these courses or programs engages, on average, about 27 students per year, but range in size from 2 to 160. The duration of the immersion experience likewise varies greatly from 3 to 400 h. The objectives of these programs are mostly to identify problems, develop engineering solutions to problems, or to learn clinical procedures. Despite the impressive breadth of experiences revealed by this survey, we still know relatively little about their impact on student learning, motivation, identity, or career path. Desired outcomes and assessment strategies must be better aligned with the structure of the clinical immersion experiences themselves if we are to determine if they are effective in meeting those outcomes, including those of professional preparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00107-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00107-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于生物医学工程专业的本科生和研究生来说,沉浸在临床环境中通常被认为是一个宝贵的体验式学习机会。沉浸式学习被认为可以促进对医学文化、临床操作、跨专业合作的理解,并经常让学生识别未满足的临床需求。美国国立卫生研究院通过拨款支持将这些临床沉浸式项目纳入生物医学工程课程的努力,这可能有助于这些项目在美国的推广。未知的是,临床沉浸式体验在生物医学工程项目中有多常见,通常是如何组织和执行的,以及它们的目标。我们对生物医学工程项目进行了一项调查,以了解有多少项目提供临床沉浸体验,在什么时间段内以什么形式提供,以及对其目标和学习结果的了解。我们在这里展示了这项调查的结果,其中包括52个临床沉浸式课程和项目,其中14个是或以前由美国国立卫生研究院资助的。这些课程或项目平均每年约有27名学生参加,但规模从2到160人不等。浸入体验的持续时间也有很大的变化,从3到400小时不等。这些项目的目标主要是识别问题,开发问题的工程解决方案,或学习临床程序。尽管这项调查揭示了令人印象深刻的丰富经验,但我们对它们对学生学习、动机、身份或职业道路的影响仍然知之甚少。如果我们要确定期望的结果和评估策略是否能有效地满足这些结果,包括专业准备的结果,那么它们必须更好地与临床沉浸体验本身的结构相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey of Clinical Immersion Experiences in Biomedical Engineering.

Immersion in clinical environments is generally believed to be a valuable experiential learning opportunity for students in biomedical engineering, both at the undergraduate and the graduate level. Immersion is believed to foster an understanding of medical culture, clinical operations, interprofessional collaboration, and oftentimes allows students to either identify unmet clinical needs. The National Institutes of Health supports efforts through grants to incorporate these clinical immersion programs into biomedical engineering curricula, and this has potentially facilitated an expansion of these programs across the United States. Unknown is how common clinical immersion experiences are in biomedical engineering programs, in general how these are organized and executed, and their goals. We conducted a survey of biomedical engineering programs to learn how many programs offer clinical immersion experiences, over what timeframe and in what formats, and what is known about their goals and learning outcomes. We present here the results of that survey which includes 52 clinical immersion courses and programs, 14 of which either are or were previously funded by the NIH. Each of these courses or programs engages, on average, about 27 students per year, but range in size from 2 to 160. The duration of the immersion experience likewise varies greatly from 3 to 400 h. The objectives of these programs are mostly to identify problems, develop engineering solutions to problems, or to learn clinical procedures. Despite the impressive breadth of experiences revealed by this survey, we still know relatively little about their impact on student learning, motivation, identity, or career path. Desired outcomes and assessment strategies must be better aligned with the structure of the clinical immersion experiences themselves if we are to determine if they are effective in meeting those outcomes, including those of professional preparation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Practical Research Methods Course That Teaches How to Be a Successful Biomedical Engineering Graduate Student Lessons from Developing a Rubric for Evaluating Need Statements on Health Technology Innovation Projects Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Systems Thinking in Synthetic Biology Design: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Coming Full Circle: The 360° Experience for Biomedical Engineering Technology Students Incorporating a Hands-On Device-Based Activity in a Human Factors Biomedical Engineering Course in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1