内镜干预在胃食管反流的管理:叙述回顾。

Andrew Akcelik, Claire Miller, Charles Bakhos, Abbas Abbas, Roman Petrov
{"title":"内镜干预在胃食管反流的管理:叙述回顾。","authors":"Andrew Akcelik,&nbsp;Claire Miller,&nbsp;Charles Bakhos,&nbsp;Abbas Abbas,&nbsp;Roman Petrov","doi":"10.21037/aoe-21-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this review is to describe and compare current and historic endoscopic interventions for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of GERD affects a large portion of the population. Nearly half of those treated with conservative medical therapy have refractory symptoms of reflux. Surgery is a durable solution for reflux, however, it is an invasive procedure and classical fundoplication comes with its own share of side effects and complications. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and pitfalls of available endoscopic procedures, and describe medium-term (up to several years) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search of the PubMed database, including the years 1999 to 2021 was performed with search terms to reflect the described devices in the review. Individual review of retrieved references was performed for additional sources. Thorough review of societal guidelines was also conducted in preparation of this manuscript.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem in the United States and worldwide, and its prevalence continues to increase. Within the last two decades, there have been several new endoscopic modalities introduced for the management of this disease. Here, we present a focused review of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux interventions, its advantages and pitfalls. Surgeons focusing on the foregut conditions should be aware of these procedures as they may provide a minimally invasive option for the selected group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":"6 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/7c/nihms-1762115.PMC10128619.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic interventions in the management of the gastroesophageal reflux: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Akcelik,&nbsp;Claire Miller,&nbsp;Charles Bakhos,&nbsp;Abbas Abbas,&nbsp;Roman Petrov\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoe-21-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this review is to describe and compare current and historic endoscopic interventions for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of GERD affects a large portion of the population. Nearly half of those treated with conservative medical therapy have refractory symptoms of reflux. Surgery is a durable solution for reflux, however, it is an invasive procedure and classical fundoplication comes with its own share of side effects and complications. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and pitfalls of available endoscopic procedures, and describe medium-term (up to several years) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search of the PubMed database, including the years 1999 to 2021 was performed with search terms to reflect the described devices in the review. Individual review of retrieved references was performed for additional sources. Thorough review of societal guidelines was also conducted in preparation of this manuscript.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem in the United States and worldwide, and its prevalence continues to increase. Within the last two decades, there have been several new endoscopic modalities introduced for the management of this disease. Here, we present a focused review of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux interventions, its advantages and pitfalls. Surgeons focusing on the foregut conditions should be aware of these procedures as they may provide a minimally invasive option for the selected group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/7c/nihms-1762115.PMC10128619.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-21-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-21-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述的目的是描述和比较目前和历史上胃食管反流病(GERD)的内镜干预措施。背景:胃反流的患病率影响了很大一部分人群。近一半接受保守药物治疗的患者出现难治性反流症状。手术是一种持久的解决反流的方法,然而,它是一种侵入性的手术,经典的盆底复制有其自身的副作用和并发症。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论现有内窥镜手术的优点和缺陷,并描述中期(长达几年)的结果。方法:检索PubMed数据库1999 - 2021年的文献,检索词反映综述中描述的器械。对检索到的参考文献进行个别审查,以获取其他来源。在准备本手稿时,还对社会准则进行了彻底的审查。结论:胃食管反流在美国和世界范围内是一个常见的问题,其患病率持续上升。在过去的二十年里,有几种新的内镜治疗方法被引入到这种疾病的治疗中。在这里,我们提出了一个重点回顾内镜胃食管反流干预,其优点和缺陷。专注于前肠疾病的外科医生应该了解这些手术,因为它们可能为选定的患者组提供微创选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic interventions in the management of the gastroesophageal reflux: a narrative review.

Objective: The goal of this review is to describe and compare current and historic endoscopic interventions for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Background: The prevalence of GERD affects a large portion of the population. Nearly half of those treated with conservative medical therapy have refractory symptoms of reflux. Surgery is a durable solution for reflux, however, it is an invasive procedure and classical fundoplication comes with its own share of side effects and complications. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and pitfalls of available endoscopic procedures, and describe medium-term (up to several years) outcomes.

Methods: Literature search of the PubMed database, including the years 1999 to 2021 was performed with search terms to reflect the described devices in the review. Individual review of retrieved references was performed for additional sources. Thorough review of societal guidelines was also conducted in preparation of this manuscript.

Conclusions: Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem in the United States and worldwide, and its prevalence continues to increase. Within the last two decades, there have been several new endoscopic modalities introduced for the management of this disease. Here, we present a focused review of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux interventions, its advantages and pitfalls. Surgeons focusing on the foregut conditions should be aware of these procedures as they may provide a minimally invasive option for the selected group of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1