膀胱癌风险基因相互作用的全基因组探索。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1002/ijc.34690
Evan Yi-Wen Yu, Qiu-Yi Tang, Ya-Ting Chen, Yan-Xi Zhang, Ya-Nan Dai, Yu-Xuan Wu, Wen-Chao Li, Siamak Mehrkanoon, Shi-Zhi Wang, Maurice P. Zeegers, Anke Wesselius
{"title":"膀胱癌风险基因相互作用的全基因组探索。","authors":"Evan Yi-Wen Yu,&nbsp;Qiu-Yi Tang,&nbsp;Ya-Ting Chen,&nbsp;Yan-Xi Zhang,&nbsp;Ya-Nan Dai,&nbsp;Yu-Xuan Wu,&nbsp;Wen-Chao Li,&nbsp;Siamak Mehrkanoon,&nbsp;Shi-Zhi Wang,&nbsp;Maurice P. Zeegers,&nbsp;Anke Wesselius","doi":"10.1002/ijc.34690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although GWASs have been conducted to investigate genetic variation of bladder tumorigenesis, little is known about genetic interactions that may influence bladder cancer (BC) risk. By leveraging large-scale participants from UK Biobank, we established a discovery database with 4000 Caucasian participants (2000 cases vs 2000 non-cases), a database with 1648 Caucasian participants (824 cases vs 824 non-cases) and 856 non-Caucasian participants (428 cases vs 428 non-cases) as validation. We then performed a genome-wide SNP-SNP interaction investigation related to BC risk based a machine learning approach (ie, GenEpi). Moreover, we used the selected interactions to build a BC screening model with an integrated interaction-empowered polygenic risk score (iPRS) based on Cox proportional hazard model. With Bonferroni correction, we identified 10 statistically significant pairs of SNPs, which located in 17 chromosomes. Of these, four SNP-SNP interactions were found to be positively associated with BC risk among Caucasian participants (ORs 1.57-2.03), while six SNP-SNP interactions showed negatively associated with BC risk (ORs 0.54-0.65). Only four of the SNP-SNP interactions were consistently identified in non-Caucasian participants located in <i>ST7L</i>-<i>ADSS2, FHIT</i>-<i>CHDH, LARP4B</i>-<i>LHPP</i> and <i>RBFOX3</i>-<i>MPRIP</i>. In addition, the iPRS showed a HR of 1.81 (95% CI: 1.46-2.09) compared the highest tertile to the lowest tertile, with an enhanced AUC (0.91; 95% CI:0.85-0.97) than PRS (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI:0.76-0.95; <i>P</i>-<sub>DeLong test</sub> = 2.2 × 10<sup>−4</sup>). In summary, this study identified several important SNP-SNP interactions for BC risk, and developed an iPRS model for BC screening, which may help to identify the people at high-risk state of BC before early manifestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"154 1","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijc.34690","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome-wide exploration of genetic interactions for bladder cancer risk\",\"authors\":\"Evan Yi-Wen Yu,&nbsp;Qiu-Yi Tang,&nbsp;Ya-Ting Chen,&nbsp;Yan-Xi Zhang,&nbsp;Ya-Nan Dai,&nbsp;Yu-Xuan Wu,&nbsp;Wen-Chao Li,&nbsp;Siamak Mehrkanoon,&nbsp;Shi-Zhi Wang,&nbsp;Maurice P. Zeegers,&nbsp;Anke Wesselius\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.34690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although GWASs have been conducted to investigate genetic variation of bladder tumorigenesis, little is known about genetic interactions that may influence bladder cancer (BC) risk. By leveraging large-scale participants from UK Biobank, we established a discovery database with 4000 Caucasian participants (2000 cases vs 2000 non-cases), a database with 1648 Caucasian participants (824 cases vs 824 non-cases) and 856 non-Caucasian participants (428 cases vs 428 non-cases) as validation. We then performed a genome-wide SNP-SNP interaction investigation related to BC risk based a machine learning approach (ie, GenEpi). Moreover, we used the selected interactions to build a BC screening model with an integrated interaction-empowered polygenic risk score (iPRS) based on Cox proportional hazard model. With Bonferroni correction, we identified 10 statistically significant pairs of SNPs, which located in 17 chromosomes. Of these, four SNP-SNP interactions were found to be positively associated with BC risk among Caucasian participants (ORs 1.57-2.03), while six SNP-SNP interactions showed negatively associated with BC risk (ORs 0.54-0.65). Only four of the SNP-SNP interactions were consistently identified in non-Caucasian participants located in <i>ST7L</i>-<i>ADSS2, FHIT</i>-<i>CHDH, LARP4B</i>-<i>LHPP</i> and <i>RBFOX3</i>-<i>MPRIP</i>. In addition, the iPRS showed a HR of 1.81 (95% CI: 1.46-2.09) compared the highest tertile to the lowest tertile, with an enhanced AUC (0.91; 95% CI:0.85-0.97) than PRS (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI:0.76-0.95; <i>P</i>-<sub>DeLong test</sub> = 2.2 × 10<sup>−4</sup>). In summary, this study identified several important SNP-SNP interactions for BC risk, and developed an iPRS model for BC screening, which may help to identify the people at high-risk state of BC before early manifestation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"81-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijc.34690\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34690\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管GWASs已被用于研究膀胱肿瘤发生的遗传变异,但对可能影响膀胱癌(BC)风险的遗传相互作用知之甚少。通过利用来自UK Biobank的大规模参与者,我们建立了一个包含4000名高加索参与者(2000例对2000例非病例)的发现数据库,一个包含1648名高加索参与者(824例对824例)和856名非高加索参与者(428例对428例非病例)的数据库作为验证。然后,我们基于机器学习方法(即GenEpi)进行了与BC风险相关的全基因组SNP-SNP相互作用调查。此外,我们利用选定的相互作用建立了一个基于Cox比例风险模型的综合相互作用多基因风险评分(iPRS)的BC筛查模型。通过Bonferroni校正,我们确定了10对具有统计学意义的snp,它们位于17条染色体上。其中,4个SNP-SNP相互作用与白种人的BC风险呈正相关(or为1.57-2.03),而6个SNP-SNP相互作用与BC风险负相关(or为0.54-0.65)。在位于ST7L-ADSS2、FHIT-CHDH、LARP4B-LHPP和RBFOX3-MPRIP的非高加索参与者中,只有四种SNP-SNP相互作用被一致地鉴定出来。此外,iPRS的最高分蘖与最低分蘖的比值为1.81 (95% CI: 1.46 ~ 2.09), AUC (0.91;95% CI:0.85-0.97)高于PRS (AUC: 0.86;95%置信区间:0.76—-0.95;P-DeLong检验= 2.2 × 10-4)。综上所述,本研究确定了几个重要的SNP-SNP相互作用对BC风险的影响,并建立了一个用于BC筛查的iPRS模型,这可能有助于在早期表现之前识别BC高危状态的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genome-wide exploration of genetic interactions for bladder cancer risk

Although GWASs have been conducted to investigate genetic variation of bladder tumorigenesis, little is known about genetic interactions that may influence bladder cancer (BC) risk. By leveraging large-scale participants from UK Biobank, we established a discovery database with 4000 Caucasian participants (2000 cases vs 2000 non-cases), a database with 1648 Caucasian participants (824 cases vs 824 non-cases) and 856 non-Caucasian participants (428 cases vs 428 non-cases) as validation. We then performed a genome-wide SNP-SNP interaction investigation related to BC risk based a machine learning approach (ie, GenEpi). Moreover, we used the selected interactions to build a BC screening model with an integrated interaction-empowered polygenic risk score (iPRS) based on Cox proportional hazard model. With Bonferroni correction, we identified 10 statistically significant pairs of SNPs, which located in 17 chromosomes. Of these, four SNP-SNP interactions were found to be positively associated with BC risk among Caucasian participants (ORs 1.57-2.03), while six SNP-SNP interactions showed negatively associated with BC risk (ORs 0.54-0.65). Only four of the SNP-SNP interactions were consistently identified in non-Caucasian participants located in ST7L-ADSS2, FHIT-CHDH, LARP4B-LHPP and RBFOX3-MPRIP. In addition, the iPRS showed a HR of 1.81 (95% CI: 1.46-2.09) compared the highest tertile to the lowest tertile, with an enhanced AUC (0.91; 95% CI:0.85-0.97) than PRS (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI:0.76-0.95; P-DeLong test = 2.2 × 10−4). In summary, this study identified several important SNP-SNP interactions for BC risk, and developed an iPRS model for BC screening, which may help to identify the people at high-risk state of BC before early manifestation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
期刊最新文献
Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival per consensus molecular subtype in stage III colon cancer. Combined inhibition of RAD51 and CHK1 causes synergistic toxicity in cisplatin resistant cancer cells by triggering replication fork collapse. Issue Information Environmental tobacco smoking (ETS) and esophageal cancer: A population-based case-control study in Jiangsu Province, China. HPV vaccination is highly effective and cost-effective for cervical cancer prevention in women living with HIV in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1