Lily Choi, Courtney Riedinger, Kent Gardner, Craig Ziegler, Reginald Brinson, Erica Sutton
{"title":"评估远程医疗在无并发症腹腔镜阑尾和胆囊切除术术后评价中的应用。","authors":"Lily Choi, Courtney Riedinger, Kent Gardner, Craig Ziegler, Reginald Brinson, Erica Sutton","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine is a rising field, with continuous expansion into different realms of health care delivery. However, minimal research has been done to analyze the utilization in surgical specialties. This study aims to assess satisfaction and acceptance of postoperative telehealth care after uncomplicated general surgery cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy or uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy were eligible to be enrolled in this study. Patients with gangrenous gallbladder, malignancy, operative complications, or appendix perforation were excluded. The experimental group underwent postoperative follow-up within a web-based platform (http://bluejeans.com), whereas the control group had an in-person clinic visit. Survey results containing satisfaction, comfort, and time usage were obtained. Likert scale 1-5 was utilized to quantify responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled into this prospective single intervention trial (20 experimental, 10 control). Ninety percent (<i>n</i> = 18) of the experimental group stated satisfaction with their visit, and 75% (<i>n</i> = 15) would suggest telemedicine usage to other physicians. Postoperative visit satisfaction was not statistically different between the experimental and control groups (4.2 vs. 4.5, <i>p</i> = 0.124). A higher percentage of the control group took >3 h for the visit than the telemedicine group (30% vs. 15%), with two individuals in the control group dedicating their full day to the visit, compared with zero individuals in the experimental group. Comfort with technology used during the visit was not statistically different between the telemedicine and in-person groups (4.35 vs. 4.5, <i>p</i> = 0.641).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine for postoperative evaluation on selective general surgery cases is feasible and provides adequate patient satisfaction and improved time utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gauging the Acceptance of Telemedicine in Postoperative Evaluation of Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Lily Choi, Courtney Riedinger, Kent Gardner, Craig Ziegler, Reginald Brinson, Erica Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine is a rising field, with continuous expansion into different realms of health care delivery. However, minimal research has been done to analyze the utilization in surgical specialties. This study aims to assess satisfaction and acceptance of postoperative telehealth care after uncomplicated general surgery cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy or uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy were eligible to be enrolled in this study. Patients with gangrenous gallbladder, malignancy, operative complications, or appendix perforation were excluded. The experimental group underwent postoperative follow-up within a web-based platform (http://bluejeans.com), whereas the control group had an in-person clinic visit. Survey results containing satisfaction, comfort, and time usage were obtained. Likert scale 1-5 was utilized to quantify responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled into this prospective single intervention trial (20 experimental, 10 control). Ninety percent (<i>n</i> = 18) of the experimental group stated satisfaction with their visit, and 75% (<i>n</i> = 15) would suggest telemedicine usage to other physicians. Postoperative visit satisfaction was not statistically different between the experimental and control groups (4.2 vs. 4.5, <i>p</i> = 0.124). A higher percentage of the control group took >3 h for the visit than the telemedicine group (30% vs. 15%), with two individuals in the control group dedicating their full day to the visit, compared with zero individuals in the experimental group. Comfort with technology used during the visit was not statistically different between the telemedicine and in-person groups (4.35 vs. 4.5, <i>p</i> = 0.641).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine for postoperative evaluation on selective general surgery cases is feasible and provides adequate patient satisfaction and improved time utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"259-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:远程医疗是一个新兴领域,不断扩展到医疗保健服务的不同领域。然而,很少有研究已经做了分析在外科专业的应用。本研究旨在评估普通外科术后远程医疗的满意度和接受度。方法:已行无并发症腹腔镜胆囊切除术或无并发症腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者均入选本研究。排除胆囊坏疽、恶性肿瘤、手术并发症或阑尾穿孔的患者。实验组在基于网络的平台(http://bluejeans.com)进行术后随访,而对照组则进行面对面的诊所访问。调查结果包括满意度、舒适度和时间使用。李克特量表1-5用于量化反应。结果:30例患者入组本前瞻性单干预试验(20例实验组,10例对照组)。90% (n = 18)的实验组表示满意他们的访问,75% (n = 15)的人会建议其他医生使用远程医疗。实验组与对照组术后访视满意度差异无统计学意义(4.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.124)。与远程医疗组相比,对照组患者就诊时间超过3小时的比例更高(30%对15%),对照组中有两个人全天都在就诊,而实验组中没有人。远程医疗组和现场医疗组在就诊期间使用的技术舒适度方面没有统计学差异(4.35 vs. 4.5, p = 0.641)。结论:远程医疗用于选择性普外科病例的术后评价是可行的,患者满意度较高,提高了时间利用率。
Gauging the Acceptance of Telemedicine in Postoperative Evaluation of Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy.
Background: Telemedicine is a rising field, with continuous expansion into different realms of health care delivery. However, minimal research has been done to analyze the utilization in surgical specialties. This study aims to assess satisfaction and acceptance of postoperative telehealth care after uncomplicated general surgery cases.
Methods: Patients who had undergone uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy or uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy were eligible to be enrolled in this study. Patients with gangrenous gallbladder, malignancy, operative complications, or appendix perforation were excluded. The experimental group underwent postoperative follow-up within a web-based platform (http://bluejeans.com), whereas the control group had an in-person clinic visit. Survey results containing satisfaction, comfort, and time usage were obtained. Likert scale 1-5 was utilized to quantify responses.
Results: Thirty patients were enrolled into this prospective single intervention trial (20 experimental, 10 control). Ninety percent (n = 18) of the experimental group stated satisfaction with their visit, and 75% (n = 15) would suggest telemedicine usage to other physicians. Postoperative visit satisfaction was not statistically different between the experimental and control groups (4.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.124). A higher percentage of the control group took >3 h for the visit than the telemedicine group (30% vs. 15%), with two individuals in the control group dedicating their full day to the visit, compared with zero individuals in the experimental group. Comfort with technology used during the visit was not statistically different between the telemedicine and in-person groups (4.35 vs. 4.5, p = 0.641).
Conclusions: Telemedicine for postoperative evaluation on selective general surgery cases is feasible and provides adequate patient satisfaction and improved time utilization.