血液学研究的终点选择和评价

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.beha.2023.101479
Ruta Brazauskas , Mary Eapen , Tao Wang
{"title":"血液学研究的终点选择和评价","authors":"Ruta Brazauskas ,&nbsp;Mary Eapen ,&nbsp;Tao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.beha.2023.101479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Observational studies and clinical trials<span><span> in hematology<span><span> aim to examine treatments for </span>blood disorders<span>. The outcomes being studied must address the goals of the study and provide meaningful information about treatment course, disease progression, describe patients’ survival experience and </span></span></span>quality of life. Endpoints are the specific measures of these outcomes, and much consideration should be given to their selection. In this review, we describe the outcomes and endpoints frequently used in studying hematologic diseases and provide general guidelines for their statistical analysis. The main focus is on clinical outcomes which are commonly used in establishing treatment safety and efficacy. We also briefly discuss the role surrogate and composite endpoints play in hematology studies. The importance of patient reported outcomes to comprehensive assessment of the treatment effectiveness is highlighted. Provided practical considerations for choosing primary and secondary endpoints may be helpful in designing hematology clinical trials.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8744,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","volume":"36 3","pages":"Article 101479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endpoint selection and evaluation in hematology studies\",\"authors\":\"Ruta Brazauskas ,&nbsp;Mary Eapen ,&nbsp;Tao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beha.2023.101479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Observational studies and clinical trials<span><span> in hematology<span><span> aim to examine treatments for </span>blood disorders<span>. The outcomes being studied must address the goals of the study and provide meaningful information about treatment course, disease progression, describe patients’ survival experience and </span></span></span>quality of life. Endpoints are the specific measures of these outcomes, and much consideration should be given to their selection. In this review, we describe the outcomes and endpoints frequently used in studying hematologic diseases and provide general guidelines for their statistical analysis. The main focus is on clinical outcomes which are commonly used in establishing treatment safety and efficacy. We also briefly discuss the role surrogate and composite endpoints play in hematology studies. The importance of patient reported outcomes to comprehensive assessment of the treatment effectiveness is highlighted. Provided practical considerations for choosing primary and secondary endpoints may be helpful in designing hematology clinical trials.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692623000403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692623000403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血液学的观察研究和临床试验旨在检查血液疾病的治疗方法。所研究的结果必须符合研究目标,并提供有关治疗过程、疾病进展的有意义的信息,描述患者的生存经历和生活质量。终点是衡量这些结果的具体标准,应充分考虑其选择。在这篇综述中,我们描述了血液病研究中经常使用的结果和终点,并为其统计分析提供了一般指南。主要关注的是临床结果,这些结果通常用于确定治疗的安全性和有效性。我们还简要讨论了替代终点和复合终点在血液学研究中的作用。强调了患者报告的结果对综合评估治疗效果的重要性。为选择主要和次要终点提供的实际考虑可能有助于设计血液学临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endpoint selection and evaluation in hematology studies

Observational studies and clinical trials in hematology aim to examine treatments for blood disorders. The outcomes being studied must address the goals of the study and provide meaningful information about treatment course, disease progression, describe patients’ survival experience and quality of life. Endpoints are the specific measures of these outcomes, and much consideration should be given to their selection. In this review, we describe the outcomes and endpoints frequently used in studying hematologic diseases and provide general guidelines for their statistical analysis. The main focus is on clinical outcomes which are commonly used in establishing treatment safety and efficacy. We also briefly discuss the role surrogate and composite endpoints play in hematology studies. The importance of patient reported outcomes to comprehensive assessment of the treatment effectiveness is highlighted. Provided practical considerations for choosing primary and secondary endpoints may be helpful in designing hematology clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology publishes review articles integrating the results from the latest original research articles into practical, evidence-based review articles. These articles seek to address the key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach which focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known, covering the spectrum of clinical and laboratory haematological practice and research. Although most reviews are invited, the Editor welcomes suggestions from potential authors.
期刊最新文献
CAR assembly line: Taking CAR T-cell manufacturing to the next level Analyte heterogeneity analysis as a possible potency parameter for MSC Erratum to “Special issue 37.2 and 37.3 Genetics and Function of HLA and immune-related genes in transplantation and cellular immunotherapy” [Best Pract Res Clin Haematol (2024) 101588] Editorial Board From clones to immunopeptidomes: New developments in the characterization of permissive HLA-DP mismatches in hematopoietic cell transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1