前瓣外泪囊鼻腔造口术与皮瓣切除治疗慢性泪囊炎的成功率比较。

Hosam Othman Mansour, Riad Elzaher Hassan, Ehab Tharwat, Akram Fekry Elgazzar, Mohammed Eid Abd El-Salam, Ezzeldin Ramadan Ezzeldin, Mostafa Osman Hussein, Ahmed Gomaa Elmahdy
{"title":"前瓣外泪囊鼻腔造口术与皮瓣切除治疗慢性泪囊炎的成功率比较。","authors":"Hosam Othman Mansour,&nbsp;Riad Elzaher Hassan,&nbsp;Ehab Tharwat,&nbsp;Akram Fekry Elgazzar,&nbsp;Mohammed Eid Abd El-Salam,&nbsp;Ezzeldin Ramadan Ezzeldin,&nbsp;Mostafa Osman Hussein,&nbsp;Ahmed Gomaa Elmahdy","doi":"10.51329/mehdiophthal1464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is characterized by epiphora and recurrent episodes of acute dacryocystitis. Despite the temporary effect of antibiotics in the acute phase, it is primarily managed by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). There is a new modification of external DCR that is performed without either anterior or posterior flaps. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of flapless and single-flap external DCR in adult patients with chronic symptomatic dacryocystitis secondary to NLDO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, non-randomized, interventional, comparative study of patients with chronic dacryocystitis secondary to primary acquired NLDO, we compared the surgical outcomes and complication rates of flapless external DCR to those of external DCR with only anterior flap suturing. We excluded patients who declined participation and those with soft stops, nasal problems, lid margin abnormalities, lid malposition or laxity, previous lacrimal surgery, lacrimal fistula, trauma involving the lacrimal drainage system, lack of adequate follow-up, or severe septal deviation or turbinate hypertrophy. Anatomical and functional success rates were determined at the last follow-up visit and were compared. Postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 patients with a male-to-female ratio of 16 (30.2%) to 37 (69.8%); 25 eyes underwent flapless DCR (group 1) and 28 eyes underwent anterior flap suturing DCR (group 2). The two groups had comparable demographic characteristics (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, anatomical (92.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) and functional (84.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) success rates at final follow-up were comparable between groups (both <i>P</i> > 0.05). At the one-month postoperative examination, premature tube extrusion was more often reported in group 1 (12.0%) compared to group 2 (7.1%). At the two-month follow-up examination, tube extrusion was noted in 4.0% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2, yet the difference failed to attain statistical significance (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that neither surgical method was superior in terms of anatomical or functional success rate at a maximum of one year after external DCR. Flapless DCR is a simple, effective, and reproducible alternative to the single anterior flap suturing technique for managing NLDO in adults with chronic dacryocystitis. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended before generalization can be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":36524,"journal":{"name":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/52/mehdiophth-12-001.PMC10445307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy with anterior flap versus flap excision in managing chronic dacryocystitis.\",\"authors\":\"Hosam Othman Mansour,&nbsp;Riad Elzaher Hassan,&nbsp;Ehab Tharwat,&nbsp;Akram Fekry Elgazzar,&nbsp;Mohammed Eid Abd El-Salam,&nbsp;Ezzeldin Ramadan Ezzeldin,&nbsp;Mostafa Osman Hussein,&nbsp;Ahmed Gomaa Elmahdy\",\"doi\":\"10.51329/mehdiophthal1464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is characterized by epiphora and recurrent episodes of acute dacryocystitis. Despite the temporary effect of antibiotics in the acute phase, it is primarily managed by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). There is a new modification of external DCR that is performed without either anterior or posterior flaps. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of flapless and single-flap external DCR in adult patients with chronic symptomatic dacryocystitis secondary to NLDO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, non-randomized, interventional, comparative study of patients with chronic dacryocystitis secondary to primary acquired NLDO, we compared the surgical outcomes and complication rates of flapless external DCR to those of external DCR with only anterior flap suturing. We excluded patients who declined participation and those with soft stops, nasal problems, lid margin abnormalities, lid malposition or laxity, previous lacrimal surgery, lacrimal fistula, trauma involving the lacrimal drainage system, lack of adequate follow-up, or severe septal deviation or turbinate hypertrophy. Anatomical and functional success rates were determined at the last follow-up visit and were compared. Postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 patients with a male-to-female ratio of 16 (30.2%) to 37 (69.8%); 25 eyes underwent flapless DCR (group 1) and 28 eyes underwent anterior flap suturing DCR (group 2). The two groups had comparable demographic characteristics (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, anatomical (92.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) and functional (84.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) success rates at final follow-up were comparable between groups (both <i>P</i> > 0.05). At the one-month postoperative examination, premature tube extrusion was more often reported in group 1 (12.0%) compared to group 2 (7.1%). At the two-month follow-up examination, tube extrusion was noted in 4.0% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2, yet the difference failed to attain statistical significance (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that neither surgical method was superior in terms of anatomical or functional success rate at a maximum of one year after external DCR. Flapless DCR is a simple, effective, and reproducible alternative to the single anterior flap suturing technique for managing NLDO in adults with chronic dacryocystitis. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended before generalization can be justified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/52/mehdiophth-12-001.PMC10445307.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼻泪管梗阻(NLDO)的特征是急性泪囊炎的反复发作。尽管抗生素在急性期有暂时的作用,但主要通过泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)进行治疗。有一种新的改良的外部DCR,既没有前瓣也没有后瓣。本研究旨在比较无瓣和单瓣体外DCR治疗NLDO继发慢性症状性泪囊炎的效果。方法:对原发性获得性NLDO继发慢性泪囊炎患者进行回顾性、非随机、介入性、比较研究,比较无瓣外DCR与仅前瓣外DCR的手术效果和并发症发生率。我们排除了拒绝参与的患者,以及有软止流、鼻腔问题、眼睑边缘异常、眼睑错位或松弛、既往泪道手术、泪道瘘、泪道引流系统创伤、缺乏足够的随访、严重的中隔偏曲或鼻甲肥大的患者。在最后一次随访时确定解剖和功能成功率并进行比较。记录两组术后并发症并进行比较。结果:我们纳入53例患者,男女比例为16 (30.2%):37 (69.8%);无瓣DCR组25眼(1组),前瓣缝合DCR组28眼(2组)。两组人口统计学特征比较,差异均有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。最终随访时解剖成功率(组1 92.0%,组2 92.9%)和功能成功率(组1 84.0%,组2 92.9%)组间比较具有可比性(P > 0.05)。在术后1个月的检查中,1组(12.0%)比2组(7.1%)更常报告过早的管挤压。随访2个月时,组1和组2的管挤压率分别为4.0%和0.0%,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:我们发现两种手术方法在体外DCR后最多一年的解剖或功能成功率方面都没有优势。无瓣DCR是治疗成人慢性泪囊炎NLDO的一种简单、有效、可重复的方法,可替代单前瓣缝合技术。然而,在推广之前,建议进一步进行更大样本量和更长的随访期的随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy with anterior flap versus flap excision in managing chronic dacryocystitis.

Background: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is characterized by epiphora and recurrent episodes of acute dacryocystitis. Despite the temporary effect of antibiotics in the acute phase, it is primarily managed by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). There is a new modification of external DCR that is performed without either anterior or posterior flaps. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of flapless and single-flap external DCR in adult patients with chronic symptomatic dacryocystitis secondary to NLDO.

Methods: In this retrospective, non-randomized, interventional, comparative study of patients with chronic dacryocystitis secondary to primary acquired NLDO, we compared the surgical outcomes and complication rates of flapless external DCR to those of external DCR with only anterior flap suturing. We excluded patients who declined participation and those with soft stops, nasal problems, lid margin abnormalities, lid malposition or laxity, previous lacrimal surgery, lacrimal fistula, trauma involving the lacrimal drainage system, lack of adequate follow-up, or severe septal deviation or turbinate hypertrophy. Anatomical and functional success rates were determined at the last follow-up visit and were compared. Postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups.

Results: We included 53 patients with a male-to-female ratio of 16 (30.2%) to 37 (69.8%); 25 eyes underwent flapless DCR (group 1) and 28 eyes underwent anterior flap suturing DCR (group 2). The two groups had comparable demographic characteristics (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, anatomical (92.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) and functional (84.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) success rates at final follow-up were comparable between groups (both P > 0.05). At the one-month postoperative examination, premature tube extrusion was more often reported in group 1 (12.0%) compared to group 2 (7.1%). At the two-month follow-up examination, tube extrusion was noted in 4.0% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2, yet the difference failed to attain statistical significance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: We found that neither surgical method was superior in terms of anatomical or functional success rate at a maximum of one year after external DCR. Flapless DCR is a simple, effective, and reproducible alternative to the single anterior flap suturing technique for managing NLDO in adults with chronic dacryocystitis. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended before generalization can be justified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Crocus sativus (saffron) and age-related macular degeneration. Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis. Intraretinal hyperreflective line: potential biomarker in various retinal disorders. Multifocal electroretinogram changes after panretinal photocoagulation in early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. One-year outcomes after intraocular collamer lens implantation in hyperopic astigmatism: a retrospective single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1