三种子宫强直药物预防剖宫产术后失血的疗效:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ginekologia polska Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.5603/gpl.93374
Çağlar Çetin, Hanife Rana Dural, Pınar Özcan, Fatma Başak Tanoğlu, Mehmet Serdar Kütük, Özge Pasin, Seda Ateş
{"title":"三种子宫强直药物预防剖宫产术后失血的疗效:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。","authors":"Çağlar Çetin,&nbsp;Hanife Rana Dural,&nbsp;Pınar Özcan,&nbsp;Fatma Başak Tanoğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Serdar Kütük,&nbsp;Özge Pasin,&nbsp;Seda Ateş","doi":"10.5603/gpl.93374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of three regimes of uterotonic agents on PPH in women undergoing cesarean section in our RCT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was a randomized controlled study (NCT05083910) performed at the Bezmialem Vakif University between July 2021 and January 2022. All women were randomly allocated into three groups: Group I (n = 52) - oxytocin only; Group II (n = 52) - the combination of oxytocin plus intrauterine misoprostol; Group III (n = 52) - carbetocin only. The primary outcome measures were: PPH to evaluate with the change between the concentrations of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, hematocrit and intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The blood loss characteristics, including the change in hemoglobin and the change in hematocrit concentration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative additional hemostatic uterine sutures and the need for additional uterotonics, were lowest in group III, although all groups were comparable in terms of blood loss parameters. Group III had the highest blood loss ratio, exceeding 1000 mL. For the combination of oxytocin and intrauterine misoprostol, the ARR was 3.8% (95% CI 20.02-12.33), with a RR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.58-2.39) and a NNT of 26 (95% CI 8.1-4.9); for carbetocin, the ARR was 5.8% (95% CI 22.15-10.61), with a RR of 1.27 (95% CI 0.63-2.53) and a NNT of 17 (95% CI 9.41-4.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate that carbetocin shows no superiority in the prevention of PPH in women undergoing cesarean section. Oxytocin still seems to be a highly effective alternative to prevent PPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":12727,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of three regimes of uterotonic agents for prevention of postpartum blood loss at undergoing cesarean section: a prospective randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Çağlar Çetin,&nbsp;Hanife Rana Dural,&nbsp;Pınar Özcan,&nbsp;Fatma Başak Tanoğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Serdar Kütük,&nbsp;Özge Pasin,&nbsp;Seda Ateş\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.93374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of three regimes of uterotonic agents on PPH in women undergoing cesarean section in our RCT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was a randomized controlled study (NCT05083910) performed at the Bezmialem Vakif University between July 2021 and January 2022. All women were randomly allocated into three groups: Group I (n = 52) - oxytocin only; Group II (n = 52) - the combination of oxytocin plus intrauterine misoprostol; Group III (n = 52) - carbetocin only. The primary outcome measures were: PPH to evaluate with the change between the concentrations of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, hematocrit and intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The blood loss characteristics, including the change in hemoglobin and the change in hematocrit concentration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative additional hemostatic uterine sutures and the need for additional uterotonics, were lowest in group III, although all groups were comparable in terms of blood loss parameters. Group III had the highest blood loss ratio, exceeding 1000 mL. For the combination of oxytocin and intrauterine misoprostol, the ARR was 3.8% (95% CI 20.02-12.33), with a RR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.58-2.39) and a NNT of 26 (95% CI 8.1-4.9); for carbetocin, the ARR was 5.8% (95% CI 22.15-10.61), with a RR of 1.27 (95% CI 0.63-2.53) and a NNT of 17 (95% CI 9.41-4.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate that carbetocin shows no superiority in the prevention of PPH in women undergoing cesarean section. Oxytocin still seems to be a highly effective alternative to prevent PPH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.93374\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.93374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在我们的随机对照试验中,比较三种方案的子宫扩张药物对剖宫产妇女PPH的疗效。材料和方法:本研究是一项随机对照研究(NCT05083910),于2021年7月至2022年1月在Bezmialem Vakif大学进行。所有女性随机分为三组:第一组(n = 52) -仅使用催产素;II组(n = 52)——催产素联合宫内米索前列醇;III组(n = 52)仅使用卡贝霉素。主要观察指标为:PPH与术前、术后血红蛋白浓度、红细胞压积及术中出血量的变化。结果:出血量特征,包括血红蛋白和红细胞压积浓度的变化、术中出血量、术中额外止血子宫缝合和需要额外子宫强张,III组最低,尽管所有组在出血量参数方面具有可比性。第三组出血率最高,超过1000 mL。催产素联合宫内米索前列醇的ARR为3.8% (95% CI 20.02-12.33), RR为1.18 (95% CI 0.58-2.39), NNT为26 (95% CI 8.1-4.9);卡霉素的ARR为5.8% (95% CI 22.15-10.61), RR为1.27 (95% CI 0.63-2.53), NNT为17 (95% CI 9.41-4.51)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,卡贝霉素在预防剖宫产妇女PPH方面没有优势。催产素似乎仍然是预防PPH的一种非常有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of three regimes of uterotonic agents for prevention of postpartum blood loss at undergoing cesarean section: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of three regimes of uterotonic agents on PPH in women undergoing cesarean section in our RCT.

Material and methods: This study was a randomized controlled study (NCT05083910) performed at the Bezmialem Vakif University between July 2021 and January 2022. All women were randomly allocated into three groups: Group I (n = 52) - oxytocin only; Group II (n = 52) - the combination of oxytocin plus intrauterine misoprostol; Group III (n = 52) - carbetocin only. The primary outcome measures were: PPH to evaluate with the change between the concentrations of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, hematocrit and intraoperative blood loss.

Results: The blood loss characteristics, including the change in hemoglobin and the change in hematocrit concentration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative additional hemostatic uterine sutures and the need for additional uterotonics, were lowest in group III, although all groups were comparable in terms of blood loss parameters. Group III had the highest blood loss ratio, exceeding 1000 mL. For the combination of oxytocin and intrauterine misoprostol, the ARR was 3.8% (95% CI 20.02-12.33), with a RR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.58-2.39) and a NNT of 26 (95% CI 8.1-4.9); for carbetocin, the ARR was 5.8% (95% CI 22.15-10.61), with a RR of 1.27 (95% CI 0.63-2.53) and a NNT of 17 (95% CI 9.41-4.51).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that carbetocin shows no superiority in the prevention of PPH in women undergoing cesarean section. Oxytocin still seems to be a highly effective alternative to prevent PPH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ginekologia polska
Ginekologia polska OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ginekologia Polska’ is a monthly medical journal published in Polish and English language. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ will accept submissions relating to any aspect of gynaecology, obstetrics and areas directly related. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ publishes original contributions, comparative works, case studies, letters to the editor and many other categories of articles.
期刊最新文献
Apical defect - the essence of cystocele pathogenesis? ICTP concentration in cervical-vaginal fluid as a potential marker of membrane collagen degradation before labor. The 18-year-old-girl with unicornuate uterus and endometriosis. Using progesterone to follicular index ratio is better correlated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome than using serum progesterone level alone. Streptococcus mutans in the oral cavity as a risk factor for threatened miscarriage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1