认知碳水化合物限制:低碳水化合物饮食时代饮食心态的新建议。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20230601
Jônatas de Oliveira
{"title":"认知碳水化合物限制:低碳水化合物饮食时代饮食心态的新建议。","authors":"Jônatas de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20230601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Low-carb diets have been considered again for weight loss in trials, and their spread goes hand in hand with the increase in unsupervised practices, as seen in intermittent fasting strategies1. Even if the results of controlled studies indicate more consistent results, the discussions also reach the lay public, who will make food choices, considering information dissipated on the Internet and by health professionals2. Feinman et al. evaluated an online support forum with 86,000 members discussing lowcarb, “Active Low-Carber Forums3,” and recently investigated this practice among university students in Brazil. In 2018, 25% of students practiced low-carb4. However, analyses of this behavioral profile and how food choices are made still lack appropriate methodologies to understand the low-carb phenomenon. Considering all the information and the various types of low-carb diets1, how do these people plan their eating behaviors to ensure this restriction? In other words, eating attitudes (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and feelings), specifically about the food source of this macronutrient, are elements of choice that determine consumption. Considering this problem, we adapted the cognitive restriction subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, which assesses how willing, in terms of thoughts and behaviors, individuals are to restrict food in order to change shape and body weight5. The change was to identify this carbohydrate-directed diet mindset6. An example is question #3, “I do not eat some foods because they make me fat,” which was adapted to “I do not eat some foods (source of carbohydrates) because they make me fat.” Low-carb dieters showed more remarkable cognitive restraint and more significant cognitive restriction of carbohydrates compared to non-dieters. Nevertheless, the overall score for cognitive restraint on carbohydrates correlated positively with guilt for food cravings in low-carb dieters7. These findings indicate that unsupervised and popularly advertised diets will not always be aligned with healthy eating behavior, requiring further studies regarding diet mentality and other ways of thinking about food from an attitudinal point of view, which can be worked on in psychoeducational proposals and treatment programs.","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":"69 8","pages":"e20230601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/f9/1806-9282-ramb-69-08-e20230601.PMC10427171.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive carbohydrate restriction: a new proposal for the diet mentality in the era of low-carb diets.\",\"authors\":\"Jônatas de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20230601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, Low-carb diets have been considered again for weight loss in trials, and their spread goes hand in hand with the increase in unsupervised practices, as seen in intermittent fasting strategies1. Even if the results of controlled studies indicate more consistent results, the discussions also reach the lay public, who will make food choices, considering information dissipated on the Internet and by health professionals2. Feinman et al. evaluated an online support forum with 86,000 members discussing lowcarb, “Active Low-Carber Forums3,” and recently investigated this practice among university students in Brazil. In 2018, 25% of students practiced low-carb4. However, analyses of this behavioral profile and how food choices are made still lack appropriate methodologies to understand the low-carb phenomenon. Considering all the information and the various types of low-carb diets1, how do these people plan their eating behaviors to ensure this restriction? In other words, eating attitudes (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and feelings), specifically about the food source of this macronutrient, are elements of choice that determine consumption. Considering this problem, we adapted the cognitive restriction subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, which assesses how willing, in terms of thoughts and behaviors, individuals are to restrict food in order to change shape and body weight5. The change was to identify this carbohydrate-directed diet mindset6. An example is question #3, “I do not eat some foods because they make me fat,” which was adapted to “I do not eat some foods (source of carbohydrates) because they make me fat.” Low-carb dieters showed more remarkable cognitive restraint and more significant cognitive restriction of carbohydrates compared to non-dieters. Nevertheless, the overall score for cognitive restraint on carbohydrates correlated positively with guilt for food cravings in low-carb dieters7. These findings indicate that unsupervised and popularly advertised diets will not always be aligned with healthy eating behavior, requiring further studies regarding diet mentality and other ways of thinking about food from an attitudinal point of view, which can be worked on in psychoeducational proposals and treatment programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"69 8\",\"pages\":\"e20230601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/f9/1806-9282-ramb-69-08-e20230601.PMC10427171.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230601\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive carbohydrate restriction: a new proposal for the diet mentality in the era of low-carb diets.
Dear Editor, Low-carb diets have been considered again for weight loss in trials, and their spread goes hand in hand with the increase in unsupervised practices, as seen in intermittent fasting strategies1. Even if the results of controlled studies indicate more consistent results, the discussions also reach the lay public, who will make food choices, considering information dissipated on the Internet and by health professionals2. Feinman et al. evaluated an online support forum with 86,000 members discussing lowcarb, “Active Low-Carber Forums3,” and recently investigated this practice among university students in Brazil. In 2018, 25% of students practiced low-carb4. However, analyses of this behavioral profile and how food choices are made still lack appropriate methodologies to understand the low-carb phenomenon. Considering all the information and the various types of low-carb diets1, how do these people plan their eating behaviors to ensure this restriction? In other words, eating attitudes (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and feelings), specifically about the food source of this macronutrient, are elements of choice that determine consumption. Considering this problem, we adapted the cognitive restriction subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, which assesses how willing, in terms of thoughts and behaviors, individuals are to restrict food in order to change shape and body weight5. The change was to identify this carbohydrate-directed diet mindset6. An example is question #3, “I do not eat some foods because they make me fat,” which was adapted to “I do not eat some foods (source of carbohydrates) because they make me fat.” Low-carb dieters showed more remarkable cognitive restraint and more significant cognitive restriction of carbohydrates compared to non-dieters. Nevertheless, the overall score for cognitive restraint on carbohydrates correlated positively with guilt for food cravings in low-carb dieters7. These findings indicate that unsupervised and popularly advertised diets will not always be aligned with healthy eating behavior, requiring further studies regarding diet mentality and other ways of thinking about food from an attitudinal point of view, which can be worked on in psychoeducational proposals and treatment programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical features of sella turcica with comprehensive literature review. ERRATUM. A needful, unique, and in-place evaluation of the injuries in earthquake victims with computed tomography, in catastrophic disasters! The 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes: part II. The challenge of tobacco and nicotine use among women. 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1