天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数可以预测稳定失代偿期肝硬化患者的预后。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2023.0800
Theodora Oikonomou, Lampros Chrysavgis, Stefania Kiapidou, Magdalini Adamantou, Despoina Parastatidou, George V Papatheodoridis, Ioannis Goulis, Evangelos Cholongitas
{"title":"天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数可以预测稳定失代偿期肝硬化患者的预后。","authors":"Theodora Oikonomou,&nbsp;Lampros Chrysavgis,&nbsp;Stefania Kiapidou,&nbsp;Magdalini Adamantou,&nbsp;Despoina Parastatidou,&nbsp;George V Papatheodoridis,&nbsp;Ioannis Goulis,&nbsp;Evangelos Cholongitas","doi":"10.20524/aog.2023.0800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet (PLT)-based biomarkers have been studied for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. There are no data regarding their prognostic significance in decompensated cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 525 stable decompensated patients from the 2 Greek transplant centers. We measured PLT values, mean PLT volume (MPV), red cell distribution width, γ-globulins, and calculated PLT-based scores: aspartate aminotransferase-to-PLT ratio index (APRI), γ-globulin-to-PLT model, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-PLT ratio (GPR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed our cohort for 12 (range: 1-84) months. Baseline mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores were 15±6 and 8±2, respectively. On univariate analysis, MPV/PLT (hazard ratio [HR] 3.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1-14.5; P=0.05), APRI (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.006-1.06; P=0.016), GPR (HR 1.096, 95%CI 1.016-1.182; P=0.017) were significantly associated with our patients' outcome (survival vs. death or liver transplantation). In a multivariate model without MELD and CTP scores, APRI was the only significant factor associated with the outcome (HR 1.054, 95%CI 1.009-1.101; P=0.018). APRI had good discriminative ability for the outcome (area under the curve 0.723 vs. 0.675 and 0.656 for MELD and CTP scores, respectively). The optimal cutoff point was 1.3 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 65%). There were 200 patients (38%) with APRI scores <1.3 who had better survival than patients with APRI >1.3 (log rank 22.4, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a prognostic role for APRI in stable decompensated cirrhosis, regardless of the underlying etiology of chronic liver disease. This suggests new perspectives for PLT-based noninvasive scores to discriminate patients' outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/17/AnnGastroenterol-36-442.PMC10304533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index can predict the outcome in patients with stable decompensated cirrhosis.\",\"authors\":\"Theodora Oikonomou,&nbsp;Lampros Chrysavgis,&nbsp;Stefania Kiapidou,&nbsp;Magdalini Adamantou,&nbsp;Despoina Parastatidou,&nbsp;George V Papatheodoridis,&nbsp;Ioannis Goulis,&nbsp;Evangelos Cholongitas\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2023.0800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet (PLT)-based biomarkers have been studied for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. There are no data regarding their prognostic significance in decompensated cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 525 stable decompensated patients from the 2 Greek transplant centers. We measured PLT values, mean PLT volume (MPV), red cell distribution width, γ-globulins, and calculated PLT-based scores: aspartate aminotransferase-to-PLT ratio index (APRI), γ-globulin-to-PLT model, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-PLT ratio (GPR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed our cohort for 12 (range: 1-84) months. Baseline mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores were 15±6 and 8±2, respectively. On univariate analysis, MPV/PLT (hazard ratio [HR] 3.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1-14.5; P=0.05), APRI (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.006-1.06; P=0.016), GPR (HR 1.096, 95%CI 1.016-1.182; P=0.017) were significantly associated with our patients' outcome (survival vs. death or liver transplantation). In a multivariate model without MELD and CTP scores, APRI was the only significant factor associated with the outcome (HR 1.054, 95%CI 1.009-1.101; P=0.018). APRI had good discriminative ability for the outcome (area under the curve 0.723 vs. 0.675 and 0.656 for MELD and CTP scores, respectively). The optimal cutoff point was 1.3 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 65%). There were 200 patients (38%) with APRI scores <1.3 who had better survival than patients with APRI >1.3 (log rank 22.4, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a prognostic role for APRI in stable decompensated cirrhosis, regardless of the underlying etiology of chronic liver disease. This suggests new perspectives for PLT-based noninvasive scores to discriminate patients' outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/17/AnnGastroenterol-36-442.PMC10304533.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于血小板(PLT)的生物标志物已被研究用于评估肝纤维化和肝硬化。目前尚无关于其在失代偿期肝硬化中的预后意义的数据。方法:我们研究了来自希腊两个移植中心的525名稳定的失代偿期患者。我们测量了PLT值、平均PLT体积(MPV)、红细胞分布宽度、γ-球蛋白,并计算了基于PLT的评分:天冬氨酸转氨酶与PLT比值指数(APRI)、γ球蛋白与PLT模型以及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与PLT之比(GPR)。结果:我们对我们的队列进行了12个月的随访(范围:1-84)。终末期肝病(MELD)和Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)的基线平均模型评分分别为15±6和8±2。在单变量分析中,MPV/PLT(危险比[HR]3.75,95%置信区间[CI]1-1.4.5;P=0.05)、APRI(HR 1.03,95%CI 1.006-1.06;P=0.016)、GPR(HR 1.096,95%CI 1.016-1.182;P=0.017)与我们患者的结果(生存与死亡或肝移植)显著相关。在没有MELD和CTP评分的多变量模型中,APRI是与结果相关的唯一显著因素(HR 1.054,95%CI 1.009-1.101;P=0.018)。最佳分界点为1.3(敏感性71%,特异性65%)。有200名患者(38%)的APRI评分为1.3(log rank 22.4,P结论:本研究发现,无论慢性肝病的潜在病因如何,APRI在稳定失代偿期肝硬化中的预后作用。这为基于PLT的无创评分区分患者的预后提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index can predict the outcome in patients with stable decompensated cirrhosis.

Background: Platelet (PLT)-based biomarkers have been studied for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. There are no data regarding their prognostic significance in decompensated cirrhosis.

Methods: We studied 525 stable decompensated patients from the 2 Greek transplant centers. We measured PLT values, mean PLT volume (MPV), red cell distribution width, γ-globulins, and calculated PLT-based scores: aspartate aminotransferase-to-PLT ratio index (APRI), γ-globulin-to-PLT model, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-PLT ratio (GPR).

Results: We followed our cohort for 12 (range: 1-84) months. Baseline mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores were 15±6 and 8±2, respectively. On univariate analysis, MPV/PLT (hazard ratio [HR] 3.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1-14.5; P=0.05), APRI (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.006-1.06; P=0.016), GPR (HR 1.096, 95%CI 1.016-1.182; P=0.017) were significantly associated with our patients' outcome (survival vs. death or liver transplantation). In a multivariate model without MELD and CTP scores, APRI was the only significant factor associated with the outcome (HR 1.054, 95%CI 1.009-1.101; P=0.018). APRI had good discriminative ability for the outcome (area under the curve 0.723 vs. 0.675 and 0.656 for MELD and CTP scores, respectively). The optimal cutoff point was 1.3 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 65%). There were 200 patients (38%) with APRI scores <1.3 who had better survival than patients with APRI >1.3 (log rank 22.4, P<0.001).

Conclusions: This study found a prognostic role for APRI in stable decompensated cirrhosis, regardless of the underlying etiology of chronic liver disease. This suggests new perspectives for PLT-based noninvasive scores to discriminate patients' outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory bowel disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa Region: a comprehensive analysis of incidence, prevalence, and mortality from 1990-2019. Meandering main pancreatic duct syndrome: a single-center cohort study and aggregated review. Micronutrient deficiencies in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease are not associated with worse adverse clinical outcome rates. Safe outpatient discharge after gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation and analgesia: a systematic literature review. The effect of shortening vasoactive drug durations alongside endoscopic therapy in esophageal variceal bleeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1