采用开放源代码机器学习和自然语言处理的眼科手术记录编码。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1159/000530954
Yong Min Lee, Stephen Bacchi, Carmelo Macri, Yiran Tan, Robert Casson, Weng Onn Chan
{"title":"采用开放源代码机器学习和自然语言处理的眼科手术记录编码。","authors":"Yong Min Lee, Stephen Bacchi, Carmelo Macri, Yiran Tan, Robert Casson, Weng Onn Chan","doi":"10.1159/000530954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate assignment of procedural codes has important medico-legal, academic, and economic purposes for healthcare providers. Procedural coding requires accurate documentation and exhaustive manual labour to interpret complex operation notes. Ophthalmology operation notes are highly specialised making the process time-consuming and challenging to implement. This study aimed to develop natural language processing (NLP) models trained by medical professionals to assign procedural codes based on the surgical report. The automation and accuracy of these models can reduce burden on healthcare providers and generate reimbursements that reflect the operation performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of ophthalmological operation notes from two metropolitan hospitals over a 12-month period was conducted. Procedural codes according to the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) were applied. XGBoost, decision tree, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and logistic regression models were developed for classification experiments. Experiments involved both multi-label and binary classification, and the best performing model was used on the holdout test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,000 operation notes included in the study. Following manual review, the five most common procedures were cataract surgery (374 cases), vitrectomy (298 cases), laser therapy (149 cases), trabeculectomy (56 cases), and intravitreal injections (49 cases). Across the entire dataset, current coding was correct in 53.9% of cases. The BERT model had the highest classification accuracy (88.0%) in the multi-label classification on these five procedures. The total reimbursement achieved by the machine learning algorithm was $184,689.45 ($923.45 per case) compared with the gold standard of $214,527.50 ($1,072.64 per case).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates accurate classification of ophthalmic operation notes into MBS coding categories with NLP technology. Combining human and machine-led approaches involves using NLP to screen operation notes to code procedures, with human review for further scrutiny. This technology can allow the assignment of correct MBS codes with greater accuracy. Further research and application in this area can facilitate accurate logging of unit activity, leading to reimbursements for healthcare providers. Increased accuracy of procedural coding can play an important role in training and education, study of disease epidemiology and improve research ways to optimise patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ophthalmology Operation Note Encoding with Open-Source Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Min Lee, Stephen Bacchi, Carmelo Macri, Yiran Tan, Robert Casson, Weng Onn Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate assignment of procedural codes has important medico-legal, academic, and economic purposes for healthcare providers. Procedural coding requires accurate documentation and exhaustive manual labour to interpret complex operation notes. Ophthalmology operation notes are highly specialised making the process time-consuming and challenging to implement. This study aimed to develop natural language processing (NLP) models trained by medical professionals to assign procedural codes based on the surgical report. The automation and accuracy of these models can reduce burden on healthcare providers and generate reimbursements that reflect the operation performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of ophthalmological operation notes from two metropolitan hospitals over a 12-month period was conducted. Procedural codes according to the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) were applied. XGBoost, decision tree, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and logistic regression models were developed for classification experiments. Experiments involved both multi-label and binary classification, and the best performing model was used on the holdout test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,000 operation notes included in the study. Following manual review, the five most common procedures were cataract surgery (374 cases), vitrectomy (298 cases), laser therapy (149 cases), trabeculectomy (56 cases), and intravitreal injections (49 cases). Across the entire dataset, current coding was correct in 53.9% of cases. The BERT model had the highest classification accuracy (88.0%) in the multi-label classification on these five procedures. The total reimbursement achieved by the machine learning algorithm was $184,689.45 ($923.45 per case) compared with the gold standard of $214,527.50 ($1,072.64 per case).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates accurate classification of ophthalmic operation notes into MBS coding categories with NLP technology. Combining human and machine-led approaches involves using NLP to screen operation notes to code procedures, with human review for further scrutiny. This technology can allow the assignment of correct MBS codes with greater accuracy. Further research and application in this area can facilitate accurate logging of unit activity, leading to reimbursements for healthcare providers. Increased accuracy of procedural coding can play an important role in training and education, study of disease epidemiology and improve research ways to optimise patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:程序代码的准确分配对医疗保健提供者来说具有重要的医学、法律、学术和经济目的。程序编码需要准确的文档和详尽的人工来解释复杂的操作说明。眼科手术记录是高度专业化的,这一过程耗时且难以实施。本研究旨在开发由医学专业人员培训的自然语言处理(NLP)模型,以根据手术报告分配程序代码。这些模型的自动化和准确性可以减轻医疗保健提供者的负担,并产生反映所执行手术的报销。方法:对两所大城市医院12个月的眼科手术记录进行回顾性分析。根据医疗保险福利计划(MBS)采用程序代码。XGBoost、决策树、来自变换器的双向编码器表示(BERT)和逻辑回归模型被开发用于分类实验。实验涉及多标签和二进制分类,并且在拒不测试数据集上使用了性能最好的模型。结果:本研究共纳入1000份手术记录。经过手动审查,五种最常见的手术是白内障手术(374例)、玻璃体切除术(298例)、激光治疗(149例)、小梁切除术(56例)和玻璃体内注射(49例)。在整个数据集中,当前编码在53.9%的情况下是正确的。BERT模型在这五种程序的多标签分类中具有最高的分类准确率(88.0%)。机器学习算法实现的总报销额为184689.45美元(每例923.45美元),而金标准为214527.50美元(每病例1072.64美元)。结论:我们的研究证明了使用NLP技术将眼科手术记录准确地分类为MBS编码类别。将人工和机器引导的方法相结合,包括使用NLP来筛选代码过程的操作注释,以及人工审查以进行进一步审查。该技术可以允许以更高的精度分配正确的MBS码。该领域的进一步研究和应用可以促进单位活动的准确记录,从而为医疗保健提供者提供报销。提高程序编码的准确性可以在培训和教育、疾病流行病学研究以及改进优化患者结果的研究方法方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ophthalmology Operation Note Encoding with Open-Source Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing.

Introduction: Accurate assignment of procedural codes has important medico-legal, academic, and economic purposes for healthcare providers. Procedural coding requires accurate documentation and exhaustive manual labour to interpret complex operation notes. Ophthalmology operation notes are highly specialised making the process time-consuming and challenging to implement. This study aimed to develop natural language processing (NLP) models trained by medical professionals to assign procedural codes based on the surgical report. The automation and accuracy of these models can reduce burden on healthcare providers and generate reimbursements that reflect the operation performed.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of ophthalmological operation notes from two metropolitan hospitals over a 12-month period was conducted. Procedural codes according to the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) were applied. XGBoost, decision tree, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and logistic regression models were developed for classification experiments. Experiments involved both multi-label and binary classification, and the best performing model was used on the holdout test dataset.

Results: There were 1,000 operation notes included in the study. Following manual review, the five most common procedures were cataract surgery (374 cases), vitrectomy (298 cases), laser therapy (149 cases), trabeculectomy (56 cases), and intravitreal injections (49 cases). Across the entire dataset, current coding was correct in 53.9% of cases. The BERT model had the highest classification accuracy (88.0%) in the multi-label classification on these five procedures. The total reimbursement achieved by the machine learning algorithm was $184,689.45 ($923.45 per case) compared with the gold standard of $214,527.50 ($1,072.64 per case).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates accurate classification of ophthalmic operation notes into MBS coding categories with NLP technology. Combining human and machine-led approaches involves using NLP to screen operation notes to code procedures, with human review for further scrutiny. This technology can allow the assignment of correct MBS codes with greater accuracy. Further research and application in this area can facilitate accurate logging of unit activity, leading to reimbursements for healthcare providers. Increased accuracy of procedural coding can play an important role in training and education, study of disease epidemiology and improve research ways to optimise patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Anp32b-deficiency suppresses ocular development by repression of Pax6. Analysis of retinal and choroidal microvasculature in systemic sclerosis using optical coherence tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Longitudinal changes in choroidal thickness and choroidal vascularity index in age-related macular degeneration. Efficacy of intracameral mydriatics in pediatric lens surgery. Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation as Assessed by Water Drinking Test Following iStent inject Implantation in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1