2019冠状病毒病大流行前后眼内炎的临床特点及转归

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13777
Blake H Fortes, Prashant D Tailor, Timothy T Xu, Robert A Churchill, Matthew R Starr
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行前后眼内炎的临床特点及转归","authors":"Blake H Fortes,&nbsp;Prashant D Tailor,&nbsp;Timothy T Xu,&nbsp;Robert A Churchill,&nbsp;Matthew R Starr","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical characteristics and visual acuity outcomes of patients who presented with endophthalmitis prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective case series with historical controls included consecutive patients presenting with any form of endophthalmitis from March 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from March 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020 (COVID-19) at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), Health System (MCHS), Arizona (MCA), and Florida (MCF) sites. Cases were divided into \"pre-COVID-19\" versus \"COVID-19\" groups depending on when they first presented with endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight cases of endophthalmitis presented to all Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 10 patients presented during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the same six-month period the year prior, 18 patients presented with endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis etiology (post-injection, post-cataract extraction, post-glaucoma filtering surgery, post-pars plana vitrectomy, endogenous, and others) was similar between both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.34), as was post-injection endophthalmitis rate (<i>P</i> = 0.69), days to presentation (<i>P</i> = 0.07), initial management (<i>P</i> = 0.11), culture-positivity rate (<i>P</i> = 0.70), and need for subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (<i>P</i> = 1). Visual acuity outcomes were similar between both groups at six months, however, the mean LogMAR visual acuity at presentation was worse in the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (2.44 vs 1.82; <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical characteristics and the post-injection endophthalmitis rate were similar during both periods, however, patients presented with worse vision during the pandemic suggesting that the pandemic may have contributed to delayed presentation, regardless, outcomes are still poor.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"289-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Endophthalmitis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Blake H Fortes,&nbsp;Prashant D Tailor,&nbsp;Timothy T Xu,&nbsp;Robert A Churchill,&nbsp;Matthew R Starr\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical characteristics and visual acuity outcomes of patients who presented with endophthalmitis prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective case series with historical controls included consecutive patients presenting with any form of endophthalmitis from March 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from March 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020 (COVID-19) at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), Health System (MCHS), Arizona (MCA), and Florida (MCF) sites. Cases were divided into \\\"pre-COVID-19\\\" versus \\\"COVID-19\\\" groups depending on when they first presented with endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight cases of endophthalmitis presented to all Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 10 patients presented during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the same six-month period the year prior, 18 patients presented with endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis etiology (post-injection, post-cataract extraction, post-glaucoma filtering surgery, post-pars plana vitrectomy, endogenous, and others) was similar between both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.34), as was post-injection endophthalmitis rate (<i>P</i> = 0.69), days to presentation (<i>P</i> = 0.07), initial management (<i>P</i> = 0.11), culture-positivity rate (<i>P</i> = 0.70), and need for subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (<i>P</i> = 1). Visual acuity outcomes were similar between both groups at six months, however, the mean LogMAR visual acuity at presentation was worse in the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (2.44 vs 1.82; <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical characteristics and the post-injection endophthalmitis rate were similar during both periods, however, patients presented with worse vision during the pandemic suggesting that the pandemic may have contributed to delayed presentation, regardless, outcomes are still poor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"289-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i3.13777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行前和期间出现眼内炎患者的临床特征和视力结局。方法:该多中心回顾性病例系列纳入了2019年3月1日至2019年9月1日(COVID-19前期)和2020年3月1日至2020年9月1日(COVID-19)在梅奥诊所罗切斯特(MCR)、卫生系统(MCHS)、亚利桑那州(MCA)和佛罗里达州(MCF)连续出现的任何形式的眼内炎患者。根据患者首次出现眼内炎的时间,将患者分为“COVID-19前”组和“COVID-19”组。结果:研究期间梅奥诊所共收治28例眼内炎病例。其中,10名患者是在COVID-19大流行的前六个月出现的。在前一年相同的六个月期间,18名患者出现眼内炎。两组眼内炎的病因(注射后、白内障摘除后、青光眼滤过手术后、睫状体部切除术后、内源性等)相似(P = 0.34),注射后眼内炎发生率(P = 0.69)、发病天数(P = 0.07)、初始处理(P = 0.11)、培养阳性率(P = 0.70)和后续睫状体部切除术的必要性(P = 1)也相似。然而,两组6个月时的视力结果相似。与COVID-19前组相比,COVID-19组的平均LogMAR视力更差(2.44 vs 1.82;P = 0.026)。结论:两个时期的临床特征和注射后眼内炎发生率相似,然而,患者在大流行期间表现出更差的视力,这表明大流行可能导致延迟出现,无论如何,结果仍然很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Endophthalmitis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and visual acuity outcomes of patients who presented with endophthalmitis prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective case series with historical controls included consecutive patients presenting with any form of endophthalmitis from March 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from March 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020 (COVID-19) at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), Health System (MCHS), Arizona (MCA), and Florida (MCF) sites. Cases were divided into "pre-COVID-19" versus "COVID-19" groups depending on when they first presented with endophthalmitis.

Results: Twenty-eight cases of endophthalmitis presented to all Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 10 patients presented during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the same six-month period the year prior, 18 patients presented with endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis etiology (post-injection, post-cataract extraction, post-glaucoma filtering surgery, post-pars plana vitrectomy, endogenous, and others) was similar between both groups (P = 0.34), as was post-injection endophthalmitis rate (P = 0.69), days to presentation (P = 0.07), initial management (P = 0.11), culture-positivity rate (P = 0.70), and need for subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (P = 1). Visual acuity outcomes were similar between both groups at six months, however, the mean LogMAR visual acuity at presentation was worse in the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (2.44 vs 1.82; P = 0.026).

Conclusion: Clinical characteristics and the post-injection endophthalmitis rate were similar during both periods, however, patients presented with worse vision during the pandemic suggesting that the pandemic may have contributed to delayed presentation, regardless, outcomes are still poor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1