急性肾损伤伴体液超载患者肾脏替代治疗方式的经济分析。

Olivier Ethgen, Raghavan Murugan, Jorge Echeverri, Michael Blackowicz, Kai Harenski, Marlies Ostermann
{"title":"急性肾损伤伴体液超载患者肾脏替代治疗方式的经济分析。","authors":"Olivier Ethgen,&nbsp;Raghavan Murugan,&nbsp;Jorge Echeverri,&nbsp;Michael Blackowicz,&nbsp;Kai Harenski,&nbsp;Marlies Ostermann","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) are among the top reasons to initiate intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Prior research suggests CRRT provides more precise volume control, but whether CRRT is cost-effective remains unclear. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of CRRT for volume control compared with IHD from a U.S. healthcare payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Decision analytical model comparing health outcomes and healthcare costs of CRRT versus IHD initiation for AKI patients with FO. The model had an inpatient phase (over 90-d) followed by post-discharge phase (over lifetime). The 90-day phase had three health states: FO, fluid control, and death. After 90 days, surviving patients entered the lifetime phase with four health states: dialysis independent (DI), dialysis dependent (DD), renal transplantation, and death. Model parameters were informed by current literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate results robustness to parametric uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients or subjects: </strong>AKI patients with FO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>IHD or CRRT.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The 90-day horizon revealed better outcomes for patients initiated on CRRT (survival: CRRT 59.2% vs IHD 57.5% and DD rate among survivors: CRRT 5.5% vs IHD 6.9%). Healthcare cost was 2.7% (+$2,836) higher for CRRT. Over lifetime, initial CRRT was associated with +0.313 life years (LYs) and +0.187 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with initial IHD. Even though important savings were observed for initial CRRT with a lower rate of DD among survivors (-$13,437), it did not fully offset the incremental cost of CRRT (+$1,956) and DI survival (+$12,830). The incremental cost-per-QALY gained with CRRT over IRRT was +$10,429/QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis provides an economic rationale for CRRT as the initial modality of choice in AKI patients with FO who require renal replacement therapy. Our finding needs to be confirmed in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/8c/cc9-5-e0921.PMC10456980.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Analysis of Renal Replacement Therapy Modality in Acute Kidney Injury Patients With Fluid Overload.\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Ethgen,&nbsp;Raghavan Murugan,&nbsp;Jorge Echeverri,&nbsp;Michael Blackowicz,&nbsp;Kai Harenski,&nbsp;Marlies Ostermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) are among the top reasons to initiate intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Prior research suggests CRRT provides more precise volume control, but whether CRRT is cost-effective remains unclear. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of CRRT for volume control compared with IHD from a U.S. healthcare payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Decision analytical model comparing health outcomes and healthcare costs of CRRT versus IHD initiation for AKI patients with FO. The model had an inpatient phase (over 90-d) followed by post-discharge phase (over lifetime). The 90-day phase had three health states: FO, fluid control, and death. After 90 days, surviving patients entered the lifetime phase with four health states: dialysis independent (DI), dialysis dependent (DD), renal transplantation, and death. Model parameters were informed by current literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate results robustness to parametric uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients or subjects: </strong>AKI patients with FO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>IHD or CRRT.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The 90-day horizon revealed better outcomes for patients initiated on CRRT (survival: CRRT 59.2% vs IHD 57.5% and DD rate among survivors: CRRT 5.5% vs IHD 6.9%). Healthcare cost was 2.7% (+$2,836) higher for CRRT. Over lifetime, initial CRRT was associated with +0.313 life years (LYs) and +0.187 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with initial IHD. Even though important savings were observed for initial CRRT with a lower rate of DD among survivors (-$13,437), it did not fully offset the incremental cost of CRRT (+$1,956) and DI survival (+$12,830). The incremental cost-per-QALY gained with CRRT over IRRT was +$10,429/QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis provides an economic rationale for CRRT as the initial modality of choice in AKI patients with FO who require renal replacement therapy. Our finding needs to be confirmed in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"e0921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/8c/cc9-5-e0921.PMC10456980.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性肾损伤(AKI)和液体超载(FO)是开始间歇性血液透析(IHD)或持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的主要原因。先前的研究表明,CRRT提供了更精确的体积控制,但CRRT是否具有成本效益尚不清楚。我们从美国医疗保健支付者的角度评估了CRRT与IHD在体积控制方面的成本效益。设计:决策分析模型,比较急性肾损伤合并FO患者CRRT与IHD启动的健康结果和医疗成本。模型有一个住院期(超过90天),然后是出院期(超过一生)。90天阶段有三种健康状态:FO、体液控制和死亡。90天后,存活的患者进入生命期,有四种健康状态:独立透析(DI)、透析依赖(DD)、肾移植和死亡。模型参数由当前文献提供。进行敏感性分析以评估结果对参数不确定性的稳健性。设置:ICU。患者或受试者:伴有FO的AKI患者。干预措施:IHD或CRRT。测量结果和主要结果:90天的研究显示,开始接受CRRT治疗的患者预后更好(生存率:CRRT为59.2%,IHD为57.5%;幸存者的DD率:CRRT为5.5%,IHD为6.9%)。CRRT的医疗成本高出2.7%(+ 2,836美元)。在整个生命周期中,与初始IHD相比,初始CRRT与+0.313生命年(LYs)和+0.187质量调整生命年(QALYs)相关。尽管在早期CRRT中观察到重要的节省,幸存者的DD率较低(- 13,437美元),但它并不能完全抵消CRRT(+ 1956美元)和DI生存率(+ 12,830美元)的增量成本。CRRT比IRRT获得的每QALY增量成本为+ 10429美元/QALY。结果对敏感性分析具有稳健性。结论:我们的分析提供了CRRT作为需要肾脏替代治疗的AKI合并FO患者的初始选择的经济依据。我们的发现需要在未来的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Analysis of Renal Replacement Therapy Modality in Acute Kidney Injury Patients With Fluid Overload.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) are among the top reasons to initiate intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Prior research suggests CRRT provides more precise volume control, but whether CRRT is cost-effective remains unclear. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of CRRT for volume control compared with IHD from a U.S. healthcare payer perspective.

Design: Decision analytical model comparing health outcomes and healthcare costs of CRRT versus IHD initiation for AKI patients with FO. The model had an inpatient phase (over 90-d) followed by post-discharge phase (over lifetime). The 90-day phase had three health states: FO, fluid control, and death. After 90 days, surviving patients entered the lifetime phase with four health states: dialysis independent (DI), dialysis dependent (DD), renal transplantation, and death. Model parameters were informed by current literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate results robustness to parametric uncertainty.

Setting: ICU.

Patients or subjects: AKI patients with FO.

Interventions: IHD or CRRT.

Measurements and main results: The 90-day horizon revealed better outcomes for patients initiated on CRRT (survival: CRRT 59.2% vs IHD 57.5% and DD rate among survivors: CRRT 5.5% vs IHD 6.9%). Healthcare cost was 2.7% (+$2,836) higher for CRRT. Over lifetime, initial CRRT was associated with +0.313 life years (LYs) and +0.187 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with initial IHD. Even though important savings were observed for initial CRRT with a lower rate of DD among survivors (-$13,437), it did not fully offset the incremental cost of CRRT (+$1,956) and DI survival (+$12,830). The incremental cost-per-QALY gained with CRRT over IRRT was +$10,429/QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Our analysis provides an economic rationale for CRRT as the initial modality of choice in AKI patients with FO who require renal replacement therapy. Our finding needs to be confirmed in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1