口服水合氯醛和鼻内芬太尼对儿童脑电图镇静作用的比较研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v17i2.36019
Amir Shaf, Amir Khodarahmi, Sedighe Shahhosseini
{"title":"口服水合氯醛和鼻内芬太尼对儿童脑电图镇静作用的比较研究。","authors":"Amir Shaf,&nbsp;Amir Khodarahmi,&nbsp;Sedighe Shahhosseini","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v17i2.36019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sedation and stability during electroencephalography (EEG) in pediatrics have high clinical importance. This study compares the sedative properties of oral chloral hydrate (OCH) and intranasal fentanyl (INF).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 2020 in Isfahan City on sixty-two pediatric candidates for EEG. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving 50 mg/kg OCH and 2 μg/kg INF thirty minutes before the process. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen saturation (O2 sat) of patients, sedation, and physician's satisfaction were measured and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HR of patients decreased significantly in both groups (P< 0.001), and the patients that received INF had significantly lower HR 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.05). RR evaluation indicated significantly decreased RR in both groups (P< 0.001), and patients receiving INF had lower RR 30, 45, and 60 per minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.001). Both groups showed significantly increased sedation levels during the study (P< 0.001), and patients treated with INF had higher sedation levels 15, 30, and 45 minutes after drug administration. Satisfaction rates were higher among the group that received INF (P= 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of INF had significant analgesic and sedative effects on pediatrics undergoing EEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"17 3","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/bf/ijcn-17-099.PMC10448842.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of the Effect of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Intranasal Fentanyl on Sedation in Children for Electroencephalography.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Shaf,&nbsp;Amir Khodarahmi,&nbsp;Sedighe Shahhosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/ijcn.v17i2.36019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sedation and stability during electroencephalography (EEG) in pediatrics have high clinical importance. This study compares the sedative properties of oral chloral hydrate (OCH) and intranasal fentanyl (INF).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 2020 in Isfahan City on sixty-two pediatric candidates for EEG. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving 50 mg/kg OCH and 2 μg/kg INF thirty minutes before the process. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen saturation (O2 sat) of patients, sedation, and physician's satisfaction were measured and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HR of patients decreased significantly in both groups (P< 0.001), and the patients that received INF had significantly lower HR 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.05). RR evaluation indicated significantly decreased RR in both groups (P< 0.001), and patients receiving INF had lower RR 30, 45, and 60 per minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.001). Both groups showed significantly increased sedation levels during the study (P< 0.001), and patients treated with INF had higher sedation levels 15, 30, and 45 minutes after drug administration. Satisfaction rates were higher among the group that received INF (P= 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of INF had significant analgesic and sedative effects on pediatrics undergoing EEG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"99-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/bf/ijcn-17-099.PMC10448842.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i2.36019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i2.36019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童脑电图(EEG)中的镇静和稳定性具有很高的临床意义。本研究比较了口服水合氯醛(OCH)和鼻内芬太尼(INF)的镇静特性。材料和方法:本研究是2020年在伊斯法罕市对62名儿童脑电图候选人进行的随机临床试验。患者被随机分为两组,在治疗前30分钟接受50 mg/kg OCH和2μg/kg INF。测量并比较各组患者的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、呼吸频率(RR)和血氧饱和度(O2-sat)、镇静和医生满意度。结果:两组患者的HR均显著降低(P<0.001),接受INF治疗的患者在给药后15、30、45和60分钟的HR均明显降低(P>0.05)。RR评估显示两组患者RR均显著降低,接受INF的患者RR分别为30、45、,和给药后每分钟60次(P<0.001)。在研究期间,两组的镇静水平均显著升高(P<0.0001),接受INF治疗的患者在给药后15、30和45分钟的镇静水平更高。结论:INF对儿童脑电图有显著的镇痛、镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of the Effect of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Intranasal Fentanyl on Sedation in Children for Electroencephalography.

Objectives: Sedation and stability during electroencephalography (EEG) in pediatrics have high clinical importance. This study compares the sedative properties of oral chloral hydrate (OCH) and intranasal fentanyl (INF).

Materials & methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 2020 in Isfahan City on sixty-two pediatric candidates for EEG. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving 50 mg/kg OCH and 2 μg/kg INF thirty minutes before the process. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen saturation (O2 sat) of patients, sedation, and physician's satisfaction were measured and compared between groups.

Results: The HR of patients decreased significantly in both groups (P< 0.001), and the patients that received INF had significantly lower HR 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.05). RR evaluation indicated significantly decreased RR in both groups (P< 0.001), and patients receiving INF had lower RR 30, 45, and 60 per minutes after drug administrations (P< 0.001). Both groups showed significantly increased sedation levels during the study (P< 0.001), and patients treated with INF had higher sedation levels 15, 30, and 45 minutes after drug administration. Satisfaction rates were higher among the group that received INF (P= 0.020).

Conclusion: The use of INF had significant analgesic and sedative effects on pediatrics undergoing EEG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
A Graph-Based Statistical Approach to Identifying Functional Connectivity Networks in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Acute Encephalopathy and Refractory Hypokalemia in a 12-Year-Old Boy. Causes of Neonatal Stroke: Ibn Thalaj's (Died in 975 AD) Viewpoints. Correlation between Electrodiagnostic Findings and Cerebrospinal Fluid Changes in Children with Guillain-Barre syndrome. From Diabetes to Neuropathy: A Diagnostic Journey to Leigh Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1