孤独、社会网络规模和老年人死亡率:一项荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY European Journal of Ageing Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z
Natasja Schutter, Tjalling J Holwerda, Hannie C Comijs, Max L Stek, Jaap Peen, Jack J M Dekker
{"title":"孤独、社会网络规模和老年人死亡率:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Natasja Schutter,&nbsp;Tjalling J Holwerda,&nbsp;Hannie C Comijs,&nbsp;Max L Stek,&nbsp;Jaap Peen,&nbsp;Jack J M Dekker","doi":"10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness and social network size have been found to be predictors of mortality in older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate whether loneliness and small social network size are associated with an increased mortality risk and to review the evidence for either network size, or loneliness that constitutes the higher mortality risk. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and PsychInfo in January/February 2018 and March/April 2021. Studies that mentioned outcome data were included in the meta-analysis and coded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies. The meta-analysis showed that both loneliness and small social network size are associated with mortality risk in older adults (Hazard Ratio 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 1.06-1.14) for loneliness and 0.96 (95% Confidence Interval 0.93-0.99) for larger network size). Sensitivity analyses according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale yielded varying results. Heterogeneity was large. In conclusion, both loneliness and small social network size in older adults are associated with increased mortality, although the effect size is small. Targeting subjective and objective aspects of older adults' social contacts should be on the agenda of preventive as well as personalized medicine. In order to be able to compare the association between loneliness and network size and mortality, more studies are needed that include both these risk factors.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685120/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loneliness, social network size and mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Natasja Schutter,&nbsp;Tjalling J Holwerda,&nbsp;Hannie C Comijs,&nbsp;Max L Stek,&nbsp;Jaap Peen,&nbsp;Jack J M Dekker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Loneliness and social network size have been found to be predictors of mortality in older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate whether loneliness and small social network size are associated with an increased mortality risk and to review the evidence for either network size, or loneliness that constitutes the higher mortality risk. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and PsychInfo in January/February 2018 and March/April 2021. Studies that mentioned outcome data were included in the meta-analysis and coded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies. The meta-analysis showed that both loneliness and small social network size are associated with mortality risk in older adults (Hazard Ratio 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 1.06-1.14) for loneliness and 0.96 (95% Confidence Interval 0.93-0.99) for larger network size). Sensitivity analyses according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale yielded varying results. Heterogeneity was large. In conclusion, both loneliness and small social network size in older adults are associated with increased mortality, although the effect size is small. Targeting subjective and objective aspects of older adults' social contacts should be on the agenda of preventive as well as personalized medicine. In order to be able to compare the association between loneliness and network size and mortality, more studies are needed that include both these risk factors.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

孤独和社会网络的大小已经被发现是老年人死亡率的预测因子。本研究的目的是调查孤独和小的社会网络规模是否与死亡风险增加有关,并回顾网络规模或孤独构成更高死亡风险的证据。我们于2018年1 / 2月和2021年3 / 4月在PubMed、EMBASE和PsychInfo进行了系统的文献检索。提到结果数据的研究被纳入荟萃分析,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华队列研究质量评估量表进行编码。荟萃分析显示,孤独和较小的社会网络规模都与老年人的死亡风险相关(孤独的风险比为1.10(95%置信区间1.06-1.14),较大的社会网络规模的风险比为0.96(95%置信区间0.93-0.99))。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行的敏感性分析产生了不同的结果。异质性很大。综上所述,老年人的孤独感和较小的社会网络规模都与死亡率增加有关,尽管影响程度很小。针对老年人社会交往的主观和客观方面应列入预防和个性化医疗的议程。为了能够比较孤独与网络规模和死亡率之间的关系,需要更多的研究,包括这两个风险因素。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loneliness, social network size and mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis.

Loneliness and social network size have been found to be predictors of mortality in older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate whether loneliness and small social network size are associated with an increased mortality risk and to review the evidence for either network size, or loneliness that constitutes the higher mortality risk. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and PsychInfo in January/February 2018 and March/April 2021. Studies that mentioned outcome data were included in the meta-analysis and coded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies. The meta-analysis showed that both loneliness and small social network size are associated with mortality risk in older adults (Hazard Ratio 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 1.06-1.14) for loneliness and 0.96 (95% Confidence Interval 0.93-0.99) for larger network size). Sensitivity analyses according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale yielded varying results. Heterogeneity was large. In conclusion, both loneliness and small social network size in older adults are associated with increased mortality, although the effect size is small. Targeting subjective and objective aspects of older adults' social contacts should be on the agenda of preventive as well as personalized medicine. In order to be able to compare the association between loneliness and network size and mortality, more studies are needed that include both these risk factors.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the digital fall preventive intervention Safe Step among community-dwelling older people aged 70 and older. Internet self-efficacy moderates the association of information technology ability with successful ageing among older employees in three African samples. Does social capital enhance political participation in older adults? Multi-level evidence from the European Quality of Life Survey. Do middle-aged and older people underreport loneliness? experimental evidence from the Netherlands. Disability during the last ten years of life: evidence from a register-based study in Austria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1