牙脊高度对全颌无牙患者丙烯酸义齿和柔性义齿固位的影响:一项初步研究。

O F Olawale, T J Ogunrinde, O O Dosumu, D M Ajayi
{"title":"牙脊高度对全颌无牙患者丙烯酸义齿和柔性义齿固位的影响:一项初步研究。","authors":"O F Olawale,&nbsp;T J Ogunrinde,&nbsp;O O Dosumu,&nbsp;D M Ajayi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Removable denture still stands as the preferred option in the management of completely edentulous arch in the developing society. The prosthodontist is challenged with providing a retentive denture to the patient, alleviating the effect of tooth loss. The retention of these prostheses is influenced by the material used for it fabrication and the edentulous ridge height, hence the need to assess the retention of acrylic and flexible complete denture and the effect of edentulous ridge height.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was to assess and compare the effect of ridge height on retention of flexible and acrylic complete upper dentures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with complete upper edentulous arches were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups (A and B). Acrylic and flexible, complete maxillary dentures were fabricated for each participant. Group A wore the acrylic denture first, while group B wore the flexible denture first. Each participant was recalled after using the denture for one week, one month, and three months for data collection.At cross over time (3 months after wearing the first denture), individuals in group A were given flexible dentures, while those in group B received acrylic dentures. The patients were recalled again for data collection by one of the researchers. Kapa Intra examiner reliability test was 83.3%. Information related to denture retention were obtained and entered into IBM SPSS software version 23 for analysis. Paired t-test and linear regression were used to test for association between quantitative variables. A P-value of 0.05 was regarded as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten individuals with mean age of 66.5±9.7 years and mean anterior ridge height of 15.5 ± 2.95 mm participated in this study. The subjective and objective assessments of the dentures showed that acrylic denture possessed a better retention than flexible denture. The effect of anterior ridge height on retention, showed a statistically significant difference (p= 0.006 for acrylic denture, p = 0.001 for flexible denture).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggested that acrylic denture possesses better retention compared to the flexible type and far better in situation with lower ridge heights.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/60/AIPM-20-151.PMC10295092.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF RIDGE HEIGHT ON RETENTION OF ACRYLIC AND FLEXIBLE DENTURES IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE EDENTULOUS MAXILLARY ARCH: A PILOT STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"O F Olawale,&nbsp;T J Ogunrinde,&nbsp;O O Dosumu,&nbsp;D M Ajayi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Removable denture still stands as the preferred option in the management of completely edentulous arch in the developing society. The prosthodontist is challenged with providing a retentive denture to the patient, alleviating the effect of tooth loss. The retention of these prostheses is influenced by the material used for it fabrication and the edentulous ridge height, hence the need to assess the retention of acrylic and flexible complete denture and the effect of edentulous ridge height.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was to assess and compare the effect of ridge height on retention of flexible and acrylic complete upper dentures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with complete upper edentulous arches were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups (A and B). Acrylic and flexible, complete maxillary dentures were fabricated for each participant. Group A wore the acrylic denture first, while group B wore the flexible denture first. Each participant was recalled after using the denture for one week, one month, and three months for data collection.At cross over time (3 months after wearing the first denture), individuals in group A were given flexible dentures, while those in group B received acrylic dentures. The patients were recalled again for data collection by one of the researchers. Kapa Intra examiner reliability test was 83.3%. Information related to denture retention were obtained and entered into IBM SPSS software version 23 for analysis. Paired t-test and linear regression were used to test for association between quantitative variables. A P-value of 0.05 was regarded as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten individuals with mean age of 66.5±9.7 years and mean anterior ridge height of 15.5 ± 2.95 mm participated in this study. The subjective and objective assessments of the dentures showed that acrylic denture possessed a better retention than flexible denture. The effect of anterior ridge height on retention, showed a statistically significant difference (p= 0.006 for acrylic denture, p = 0.001 for flexible denture).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggested that acrylic denture possesses better retention compared to the flexible type and far better in situation with lower ridge heights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/60/AIPM-20-151.PMC10295092.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在发展中社会,活动义齿仍然是治疗全无牙弓的首选方法。修复医生面临的挑战是为患者提供固位义齿,减轻牙齿脱落的影响。义齿的固位受义齿制作材料和义齿牙嵴高度的影响,因此有必要对柔性义齿和丙烯酸义齿的固位以及义齿牙嵴高度的影响进行评估。目的:评价和比较义齿高度对柔性和丙烯酸全口义齿固位的影响。材料与方法:选取10例上颌全牙弓患者,随机分为两组(A组和B组),分别制作丙烯酸酯和柔性全颌义齿。A组先使用丙烯酸义齿,B组先使用柔性义齿。每个参与者在使用义齿一周、一个月和三个月后被召回进行数据收集。在交叉时间(佩戴第一副义齿3个月后),A组使用柔性义齿,B组使用丙烯酸义齿。其中一名研究人员再次召回这些患者进行数据收集。Kapa Intra考官信度测验为83.3%。获取义齿固位相关信息,输入IBM SPSS软件23版进行分析。采用配对t检验和线性回归检验定量变量之间的相关性。p值为0.05为显著性。结果:10例患者,平均年龄66.5±9.7岁,平均前脊高15.5±2.95 mm。主观、客观评价表明,丙烯酸义齿固位优于柔性义齿。前牙基牙高度对固位的影响差异有统计学意义(丙烯酸义齿p= 0.006,柔性义齿p= 0.001)。结论:亚克力义齿固位优于柔性义齿,在牙槽高较低的情况下固位效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECT OF RIDGE HEIGHT ON RETENTION OF ACRYLIC AND FLEXIBLE DENTURES IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE EDENTULOUS MAXILLARY ARCH: A PILOT STUDY.

Introduction: Removable denture still stands as the preferred option in the management of completely edentulous arch in the developing society. The prosthodontist is challenged with providing a retentive denture to the patient, alleviating the effect of tooth loss. The retention of these prostheses is influenced by the material used for it fabrication and the edentulous ridge height, hence the need to assess the retention of acrylic and flexible complete denture and the effect of edentulous ridge height.

Aim: This study was to assess and compare the effect of ridge height on retention of flexible and acrylic complete upper dentures.

Materials and methods: Ten patients with complete upper edentulous arches were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups (A and B). Acrylic and flexible, complete maxillary dentures were fabricated for each participant. Group A wore the acrylic denture first, while group B wore the flexible denture first. Each participant was recalled after using the denture for one week, one month, and three months for data collection.At cross over time (3 months after wearing the first denture), individuals in group A were given flexible dentures, while those in group B received acrylic dentures. The patients were recalled again for data collection by one of the researchers. Kapa Intra examiner reliability test was 83.3%. Information related to denture retention were obtained and entered into IBM SPSS software version 23 for analysis. Paired t-test and linear regression were used to test for association between quantitative variables. A P-value of 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results: Ten individuals with mean age of 66.5±9.7 years and mean anterior ridge height of 15.5 ± 2.95 mm participated in this study. The subjective and objective assessments of the dentures showed that acrylic denture possessed a better retention than flexible denture. The effect of anterior ridge height on retention, showed a statistically significant difference (p= 0.006 for acrylic denture, p = 0.001 for flexible denture).

Conclusion: This study suggested that acrylic denture possesses better retention compared to the flexible type and far better in situation with lower ridge heights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS, KNOWLEDGE, AND RISK PERCEPTION OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS ABOUT MPOX INFECTION IN NIGERIA. BODY STALK ANOMALY: CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS OF THIS RARE ANOMALY IN A NIGERIAN NEWBORN. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PATTERN OF DEMENTIA IN A GERIATRIC CENTRE. CURRENT LINES AND ANGLES USED IN PAEDIATRIC FOOT RADIOGRAPH: A SCOPING REVIEW OF LITERATURE. DETERMINANTS OF OUTCOME OF NEONATAL SURGICAL EMERGENCIES IN GOMBE: A 3-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1