直肠癌症患者术前放射治疗决策——基于瑞典癌症结直肠癌登记的现实世界分析

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical colorectal cancer Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2023.04.001
Bin Luo , Chuanwen Fan , Xuqin Xie , Per Loftås , Xiao-Feng Sun
{"title":"直肠癌症患者术前放射治疗决策——基于瑞典癌症结直肠癌登记的现实世界分析","authors":"Bin Luo ,&nbsp;Chuanwen Fan ,&nbsp;Xuqin Xie ,&nbsp;Per Loftås ,&nbsp;Xiao-Feng Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are 3 widely used preoperative radiotherapy (RT) procedures in rectal cancer treatment including long-course RT (LRT), short-course RT with delayed surgery (SRTW), and short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT). However, further evidence is required to determine which treatment option results in more optimal patient survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry-based retrospective study of real-world data included 7766 stage I–III rectal cancer patients, of which 2982, 1089, 763, and 2932 patients received no RT (NRT), LRT, SRTW, and SRT, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard multivariate model were used to identify potential risk factors and to examine the independent association of RT with patient survival after adjusting for baseline confounding factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>RT effects on survival differed by age and clinical T stage (cT) subgroups. Subsequent survival analysis by age and cT subgroups confirmed that patients ≥70 years old with cT4 benefited from any RT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, NRT as reference) and equally from any RT (<em>P</em> &gt; .05 pairwise between RTs). In contrast, for cT3 patients ≥70 years, SRT and LRT were associated with better survival than SRTW (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In patients &lt;70 years, LRT and SRTW had superior survival benefits in cT4 patients but inferior to SRT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001); SRT was the only effective treatment in the cT3N+ subgroup (<em>P</em> = .032); patients with cT3N0 and &lt;70 years did not benefit from any RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that preoperative RT strategies may have varying effects on the survival of rectal cancer patients, depending on their age and clinical stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Radiotherapy Decision-Tree for Rectal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry\",\"authors\":\"Bin Luo ,&nbsp;Chuanwen Fan ,&nbsp;Xuqin Xie ,&nbsp;Per Loftås ,&nbsp;Xiao-Feng Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are 3 widely used preoperative radiotherapy (RT) procedures in rectal cancer treatment including long-course RT (LRT), short-course RT with delayed surgery (SRTW), and short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT). However, further evidence is required to determine which treatment option results in more optimal patient survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry-based retrospective study of real-world data included 7766 stage I–III rectal cancer patients, of which 2982, 1089, 763, and 2932 patients received no RT (NRT), LRT, SRTW, and SRT, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard multivariate model were used to identify potential risk factors and to examine the independent association of RT with patient survival after adjusting for baseline confounding factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>RT effects on survival differed by age and clinical T stage (cT) subgroups. Subsequent survival analysis by age and cT subgroups confirmed that patients ≥70 years old with cT4 benefited from any RT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, NRT as reference) and equally from any RT (<em>P</em> &gt; .05 pairwise between RTs). In contrast, for cT3 patients ≥70 years, SRT and LRT were associated with better survival than SRTW (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In patients &lt;70 years, LRT and SRTW had superior survival benefits in cT4 patients but inferior to SRT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001); SRT was the only effective treatment in the cT3N+ subgroup (<em>P</em> = .032); patients with cT3N0 and &lt;70 years did not benefit from any RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that preoperative RT strategies may have varying effects on the survival of rectal cancer patients, depending on their age and clinical stage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153300282300049X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153300282300049X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景癌症术前放疗(RT)有三种广泛应用的方法,包括长程放疗(LRT)、延迟手术的短程放疗(SRTW)和立即手术的短程RT(SRT)。然而,还需要进一步的证据来确定哪种治疗方案能使患者获得更理想的生存率。方法这项基于瑞典癌症登记的真实世界数据回顾性研究包括7766例I–III期癌症患者,其中2982例、1089例、763例和2932例患者分别未接受RT(NRT)、LRT、SRTW和SRT。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险多变量模型用于确定潜在的风险因素,并在校正基线混杂因素后检查RT与患者生存率的独立相关性。结果RT对生存率的影响因年龄和临床T分期(cT)亚组而异。随后按年龄和cT亚组进行的生存分析证实,cT4≥70岁的患者受益于任何RT(P<;.001,NRT作为参考),同样受益于任何放疗(RT之间的配对P>;.05)。相反,对于cT3≥70岁的患者,SRT和LRT与比SRTW更好的生存率相关(P<;.001);70年后,LRT和SRTW在cT4患者中具有优越的生存益处,但低于SRT(P<;.001);SRT是cT3N+亚组中唯一有效的治疗方法(P=.032);cT3N0和<;70年没有从任何RT中获益。结论本研究表明,术前RT策略可能对癌症患者的生存产生不同的影响,这取决于他们的年龄和临床阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative Radiotherapy Decision-Tree for Rectal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry

Background

There are 3 widely used preoperative radiotherapy (RT) procedures in rectal cancer treatment including long-course RT (LRT), short-course RT with delayed surgery (SRTW), and short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT). However, further evidence is required to determine which treatment option results in more optimal patient survival.

Methods

This Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry-based retrospective study of real-world data included 7766 stage I–III rectal cancer patients, of which 2982, 1089, 763, and 2932 patients received no RT (NRT), LRT, SRTW, and SRT, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard multivariate model were used to identify potential risk factors and to examine the independent association of RT with patient survival after adjusting for baseline confounding factors.

Results

RT effects on survival differed by age and clinical T stage (cT) subgroups. Subsequent survival analysis by age and cT subgroups confirmed that patients ≥70 years old with cT4 benefited from any RT (P < .001, NRT as reference) and equally from any RT (P > .05 pairwise between RTs). In contrast, for cT3 patients ≥70 years, SRT and LRT were associated with better survival than SRTW (P < .001). In patients <70 years, LRT and SRTW had superior survival benefits in cT4 patients but inferior to SRT (P < .001); SRT was the only effective treatment in the cT3N+ subgroup (P = .032); patients with cT3N0 and <70 years did not benefit from any RT.

Conclusion

This study suggests that preoperative RT strategies may have varying effects on the survival of rectal cancer patients, depending on their age and clinical stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical colorectal cancer
Clinical colorectal cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of contents Intensification of Local Therapy With High Dose Rate, Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (HDR-IORT) and Extended Resection for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Differential Efficacy of Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Metastatic Cancers Preoperative Radiotherapy Decision-Tree for Rectal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1