TP53功能获得突变是癌症高甲基转移结直肠癌的预后不良因素

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical colorectal cancer Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2023.06.001
Shonosuke Wakayama , Kota Ouchi , Shin Takahashi , Yasuhide Yamada , Yoshito Komatsu , Ken Shimada , Tatsuro Yamaguchi , Hidekazu Shirota , Masanobu Takahashi , Chikashi Ishioka
{"title":"TP53功能获得突变是癌症高甲基转移结直肠癌的预后不良因素","authors":"Shonosuke Wakayama ,&nbsp;Kota Ouchi ,&nbsp;Shin Takahashi ,&nbsp;Yasuhide Yamada ,&nbsp;Yoshito Komatsu ,&nbsp;Ken Shimada ,&nbsp;Tatsuro Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Shirota ,&nbsp;Masanobu Takahashi ,&nbsp;Chikashi Ishioka","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neither <em>TP53</em> mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between <em>TP53</em> mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The <em>TP53</em> mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were <em>TP53</em> wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were <em>TP53</em> mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and <em>TP53</em> mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, <em>P</em> = .007, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and <em>P</em> &lt; .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (<em>P</em> = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><em>TP53</em> GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutation is a Poor Prognostic Factor in High-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Shonosuke Wakayama ,&nbsp;Kota Ouchi ,&nbsp;Shin Takahashi ,&nbsp;Yasuhide Yamada ,&nbsp;Yoshito Komatsu ,&nbsp;Ken Shimada ,&nbsp;Tatsuro Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Shirota ,&nbsp;Masanobu Takahashi ,&nbsp;Chikashi Ishioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neither <em>TP53</em> mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between <em>TP53</em> mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The <em>TP53</em> mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were <em>TP53</em> wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were <em>TP53</em> mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and <em>TP53</em> mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, <em>P</em> = .007, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and <em>P</em> &lt; .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (<em>P</em> = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><em>TP53</em> GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景TP53突变和DNA甲基化状态均未被确定为转移性癌症的单独生物标志物。我们分析了TP53突变功能亚型与全基因组DNA甲基化状态(GWMS)作为联合预后标志物之间的关系。方法患者的临床数据来自TRICOLORE研究,一项随机的III期试验。TP53突变分为野生型、功能获得(GOF)突变和非功能获得(非GOF)变异。肿瘤组织GWMS将其分为高甲基化癌症(HMCC)和低甲基化癌症(LMCC)。根据这些亚组比较总生存率(OS)。结果209例患者中,60例(28.7%)为HMCC,149例(71.3%)为LMCC,35例(16.7%)为TP53野生型,174例(83.3%)为TP五十三突变体,其中GOF突变79例(45.4%),非GOF突变95例(54.6%)。在整个队列中,HMCC组的OS比LMCC组短(中位数为25.3个月对40.3个月,P<;.001,危险比1.87)。GWMS和TP53突变亚型的联合亚组分析显示,无论原发肿瘤的位置如何,HMCC/GOF组的OS明显短于HMCC/非GOF组、LMCC/GOF组和LMCC/No-GOF组(中位数分别为17.7、35.3、40.3和41.2个月,P=0.007、P<;.001和P<;0.001)。通过多变量分析,只有HMCC(P=.009)是GOF突变组的不良预后因素。结论sTP53 GOF伴HMCC是转移性癌症最差预后分子亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutation is a Poor Prognostic Factor in High-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

Neither TP53 mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between TP53 mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.

Methods

Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The TP53 mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.

Results

Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were TP53 wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were TP53 mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, P < .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and TP53 mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, P = .007, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (P = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.

Conclusions

TP53 GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical colorectal cancer
Clinical colorectal cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of contents Intensification of Local Therapy With High Dose Rate, Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (HDR-IORT) and Extended Resection for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Differential Efficacy of Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Metastatic Cancers Preoperative Radiotherapy Decision-Tree for Rectal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1