{"title":"TP53功能获得突变是癌症高甲基转移结直肠癌的预后不良因素","authors":"Shonosuke Wakayama , Kota Ouchi , Shin Takahashi , Yasuhide Yamada , Yoshito Komatsu , Ken Shimada , Tatsuro Yamaguchi , Hidekazu Shirota , Masanobu Takahashi , Chikashi Ishioka","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neither <em>TP53</em> mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between <em>TP53</em> mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The <em>TP53</em> mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were <em>TP53</em> wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were <em>TP53</em> mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, <em>P</em> < .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and <em>TP53</em> mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, <em>P</em> = .007, <em>P</em> < .001, and <em>P</em> < .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (<em>P</em> = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><em>TP53</em> GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutation is a Poor Prognostic Factor in High-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Shonosuke Wakayama , Kota Ouchi , Shin Takahashi , Yasuhide Yamada , Yoshito Komatsu , Ken Shimada , Tatsuro Yamaguchi , Hidekazu Shirota , Masanobu Takahashi , Chikashi Ishioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neither <em>TP53</em> mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between <em>TP53</em> mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The <em>TP53</em> mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were <em>TP53</em> wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were <em>TP53</em> mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, <em>P</em> < .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and <em>TP53</em> mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, <em>P</em> = .007, <em>P</em> < .001, and <em>P</em> < .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (<em>P</em> = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><em>TP53</em> GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutation is a Poor Prognostic Factor in High-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Background
Neither TP53 mutation nor DNA methylation status has been established as a biomarker alone of metastatic colorectal cancer. We analyzed the association between TP53 mutation functional subtypes and genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) as combined prognostic markers.
Methods
Patient clinical data were obtained from the TRICOLORE study, a randomized phase III trial. The TP53 mutations were classified into wild-type, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations, and non-gain-of-function (non-GOF) mutations. GWMS of the tumor tissues classified them into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). Overall survival (OS) was compared based on these subgroups.
Results
Of the 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) were HMCC and 149 (71.3%) were LMCC, 35 (16.7%) were TP53 wild-type and 174 (83.3%) were TP53 mutants including 79 (45.4%) GOF mutations and 95 (54.6%) non-GOF mutations. The OS of the HMCC group was shorter than that of the LMCC group (median 25.3 vs. 40.3 months, P < .001, hazard ratio 1.87) in the total cohort. The combined subgroup analyses of GWMS and TP53 mutation subtypes showed that the HMCC/GOF group had significantly shorter OS than the HMCC/non-GOF group, the LMCC/GOF group, and the LMCC/non-GOF group (median 17.7; 35.3, 40.3, and 41.2 months, P = .007, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively), regardless of the primary tumor location. By the multivariate analysis, only HMCC (P = .009) was a poor prognostic factor in the GOF mutation group.
Conclusions
TP53 GOF with HMCC is a newly identified poorest prognostic molecular subset in metastatic colorectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.