促进因素和障碍相互作用与临床决策支持在ICU:混合方法的方法。

Adrian Wong, Lucas A Berenbrok, Lauren Snader, Yu Hyeon Soh, Vishakha K Kumar, Muhammad Ali Javed, David W Bates, Lauren R Sorce, Sandra L Kane-Gill
{"title":"促进因素和障碍相互作用与临床决策支持在ICU:混合方法的方法。","authors":"Adrian Wong,&nbsp;Lucas A Berenbrok,&nbsp;Lauren Snader,&nbsp;Yu Hyeon Soh,&nbsp;Vishakha K Kumar,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Javed,&nbsp;David W Bates,&nbsp;Lauren R Sorce,&nbsp;Sandra L Kane-Gill","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International survey study.</p><p><strong>Patient/subjects: </strong>Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0967"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/64/cc9-5-e0967.PMC10461946.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Wong,&nbsp;Lucas A Berenbrok,&nbsp;Lauren Snader,&nbsp;Yu Hyeon Soh,&nbsp;Vishakha K Kumar,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Javed,&nbsp;David W Bates,&nbsp;Lauren R Sorce,&nbsp;Sandra L Kane-Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International survey study.</p><p><strong>Patient/subjects: </strong>Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e0967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/64/cc9-5-e0967.PMC10461946.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床决策支持系统(cdss)用于医疗保健的各个方面,以改善临床决策,包括在ICU。然而,越来越多的证据表明,CDSS没有充分发挥其潜力,经常导致警觉疲劳,这与患者伤害有关。ICU的临床医生可能比医院非紧急部门的临床医生更容易受到警报脱敏的影响。我们评估了适当的CDSS相互作用的促进因素和障碍,并提供了改进ICU目前可用的CDSS的方法。设计:顺序解释混合方法研究设计,使用行为和接受框架。设置:国际调查研究。患者/受试者:通过调查确定的临床医生(药剂师、医生),近期具有临床决策支持经验。干预措施:一项初步调查是为了评估临床医生对其与CDSS相互作用的看法。随后进行了深入访谈,以进一步评估临床医生(药剂师、医生)对CDSS的信念和行为。然后对这些访谈进行定性分析,以确定CDSS相互作用的促进因素和障碍的主题。测量和主要结果:共有48名受访者完成了初步调查(估计回复率为15.5%)。大多数人认为响应CDSS警报是他们工作的一部分(75%),但感觉他们经历了警报疲劳(56.5%)。在定性分析中,从深度访谈中共确定了五个促进因素(患者安全、易于反应、特异性、优先级和反馈)和四个障碍(数量过多、工作环境、反应困难和不相关)。结论:在这项混合方法的调查中,我们确定了机构应该关注的领域,以改善临床医生与CDSS的适当互动,特别是在ICU。为ICU量身定制CDSS可能会改善CDSS并随后改善患者安全结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Objectives: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used in various aspects of healthcare to improve clinical decision-making, including in the ICU. However, there is growing evidence that CDSS are not used to their full potential, often resulting in alert fatigue which has been associated with patient harm. Clinicians in the ICU may be more vulnerable to desensitization of alerts than clinicians in less urgent parts of the hospital. We evaluated facilitators and barriers to appropriate CDSS interaction and provide methods to improve currently available CDSS in the ICU.

Design: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study design, using the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework.

Setting: International survey study.

Patient/subjects: Clinicians (pharmacists, physicians) identified via survey, with recent experience with clinical decision support.

Interventions: An initial survey was developed to evaluate clinician perspectives on their interactions with CDSS. A subsequent in-depth interview was developed to further evaluate clinician (pharmacist, physician) beliefs and behaviors about CDSS. These interviews were then qualitatively analyzed to determine themes of facilitators and barriers with CDSS interactions.

Measurements and main results: A total of 48 respondents completed the initial survey (estimated response rate 15.5%). The majority believed that responding to CDSS alerts was part of their job (75%) but felt they experienced alert fatigue (56.5%). In the qualitative analysis, a total of five facilitators (patient safety, ease of response, specificity, prioritization, and feedback) and four barriers (excess quantity, work environment, difficulty in response, and irrelevance) were identified from the in-depth interviews.

Conclusions: In this mixed-methods survey, we identified areas that institutions should focus on to improve appropriate clinician interactions with CDSS, specific to the ICU. Tailoring of CDSS to the ICU may lead to improvement in CDSS and subsequent improved patient safety outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1