腓骨瓣修复颌骨缺损后Hounsfield单位值骨密度评价的可行性分析。

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3
Yihui Yang, Yifan Kang, Yifan Yang, Mengkun Ding, Xiaofeng Shan, Zhigang Cai
{"title":"腓骨瓣修复颌骨缺损后Hounsfield单位值骨密度评价的可行性分析。","authors":"Yihui Yang, Yifan Kang, Yifan Yang, Mengkun Ding, Xiaofeng Shan, Zhigang Cai","doi":"10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implant-supported dentures have become an essential means of restoring occlusal function after jaw reconstruction. Bone mineral density (BMD) may influence the success rate of implant denture restorations. This study aimed to explore whether the Hounsfield unit (HU) value can be used to monitor the changing trend of fibular BMD after jaw reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients who underwent maxillar/mandibular reconstruction with a fibula flap were included in this study. There was a significant correlation between the HU value and BMD at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and both were significantly correlated with follow-up time. The difference between each pair of absorption rates (DAR) was less than 10% in 66.7% and 75.9% of patients at 3 and 6 months; however, the DAR was more than 20% in 12% and 13.8% of patients at 3 and 6 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a significant correlation between HU value and BMD. The HU value can be used to roughly reflect the fibular BMD changing trend in a group of patients as opposed to an individual, and the HU value is not equivalent to BMD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300069661, retrospectively registered on 22 March 2023. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=188953 .</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility analysis of bone density evaluation with Hounsfield unit value after fibula flap reconstruction of jaw defect.\",\"authors\":\"Yihui Yang, Yifan Kang, Yifan Yang, Mengkun Ding, Xiaofeng Shan, Zhigang Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implant-supported dentures have become an essential means of restoring occlusal function after jaw reconstruction. Bone mineral density (BMD) may influence the success rate of implant denture restorations. This study aimed to explore whether the Hounsfield unit (HU) value can be used to monitor the changing trend of fibular BMD after jaw reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients who underwent maxillar/mandibular reconstruction with a fibula flap were included in this study. There was a significant correlation between the HU value and BMD at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and both were significantly correlated with follow-up time. The difference between each pair of absorption rates (DAR) was less than 10% in 66.7% and 75.9% of patients at 3 and 6 months; however, the DAR was more than 20% in 12% and 13.8% of patients at 3 and 6 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a significant correlation between HU value and BMD. The HU value can be used to roughly reflect the fibular BMD changing trend in a group of patients as opposed to an individual, and the HU value is not equivalent to BMD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300069661, retrospectively registered on 22 March 2023. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=188953 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:种植义齿已成为颌骨重建后修复咬合功能的重要手段。骨密度(BMD)是影响种植义齿修复成功率的重要因素。本研究旨在探讨Hounsfield unit (HU)值是否可以监测颌骨重建后腓骨骨密度的变化趋势。结果:本研究共纳入54例采用腓骨瓣进行上颌/下颌骨重建的患者。术后1周、3个月、6个月的HU值与BMD有显著相关,且与随访时间均有显著相关。66.7%和75.9%的患者在3个月和6个月时两对吸收率(DAR)的差异小于10%;然而,在3个月和6个月时,分别有12%和13.8%的患者DAR超过20%。结论:HU值与骨密度有显著相关性。HU值可以大致反映一组患者而非个体腓骨骨密度的变化趋势,HU值不等同于骨密度。试验注册:ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300069661,回顾性注册于2023年3月22日。追溯登记,https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=188953。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility analysis of bone density evaluation with Hounsfield unit value after fibula flap reconstruction of jaw defect.

Background: Implant-supported dentures have become an essential means of restoring occlusal function after jaw reconstruction. Bone mineral density (BMD) may influence the success rate of implant denture restorations. This study aimed to explore whether the Hounsfield unit (HU) value can be used to monitor the changing trend of fibular BMD after jaw reconstruction.

Results: A total of 54 patients who underwent maxillar/mandibular reconstruction with a fibula flap were included in this study. There was a significant correlation between the HU value and BMD at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and both were significantly correlated with follow-up time. The difference between each pair of absorption rates (DAR) was less than 10% in 66.7% and 75.9% of patients at 3 and 6 months; however, the DAR was more than 20% in 12% and 13.8% of patients at 3 and 6 months, respectively.

Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between HU value and BMD. The HU value can be used to roughly reflect the fibular BMD changing trend in a group of patients as opposed to an individual, and the HU value is not equivalent to BMD.

Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300069661, retrospectively registered on 22 March 2023. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=188953 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual surgical plan with custom surgical guide for orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. The epidemiological and histopathological factors for delayed local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. A retrospective epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary referral hospital in istanbul: a seven-year study of 1,757 patients. Egyptian patients with cleft lip: our experience with primary rhinoplasty. Volume changes in the contralateral submandibular gland following unilateral gland excision in oral cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1