猪红细胞临床输血的前景展望

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Reviews Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.blre.2023.101113
Yevgen Chornenkyy , Takayuki Yamamoto , Hidetaka Hara , Sean R. Stowell , Ionita Ghiran , Simon C. Robson , David K.C. Cooper
{"title":"猪红细胞临床输血的前景展望","authors":"Yevgen Chornenkyy ,&nbsp;Takayuki Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Hidetaka Hara ,&nbsp;Sean R. Stowell ,&nbsp;Ionita Ghiran ,&nbsp;Simon C. Robson ,&nbsp;David K.C. Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Transfusion of allogeneic human red blood cell (hRBCs) is limited by supply and compatibility between individual donors and recipients. In situations where the </span>blood supply<span><span> is constrained or when no compatible RBCs are available, patients suffer. As a result, alternatives to hRBCs that complement existing RBC transfusion strategies are needed. Pig RBCs (pRBCs) could provide an alternative because of their abundant supply, and functional similarities to hRBCs. The ability to genetically modify pigs to limit pRBC immunogenicity and augment expression of human ‘protective’ proteins has provided major boosts to this research and opens up new therapeutic avenues. Although deletion of expression of xenoantigens has been achieved in genetically-engineered pigs, novel </span>genetic methods are needed to introduce human ‘protective’ transgenes into pRBCs at the high levels required to prevent hemolysis and extend RBC survival in vivo. This review addresses recent progress and examines future prospects for clinical xenogeneic pRBC transfusion.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56139,"journal":{"name":"Blood Reviews","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101113"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future prospects for the clinical transfusion of pig red blood cells\",\"authors\":\"Yevgen Chornenkyy ,&nbsp;Takayuki Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Hidetaka Hara ,&nbsp;Sean R. Stowell ,&nbsp;Ionita Ghiran ,&nbsp;Simon C. Robson ,&nbsp;David K.C. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Transfusion of allogeneic human red blood cell (hRBCs) is limited by supply and compatibility between individual donors and recipients. In situations where the </span>blood supply<span><span> is constrained or when no compatible RBCs are available, patients suffer. As a result, alternatives to hRBCs that complement existing RBC transfusion strategies are needed. Pig RBCs (pRBCs) could provide an alternative because of their abundant supply, and functional similarities to hRBCs. The ability to genetically modify pigs to limit pRBC immunogenicity and augment expression of human ‘protective’ proteins has provided major boosts to this research and opens up new therapeutic avenues. Although deletion of expression of xenoantigens has been achieved in genetically-engineered pigs, novel </span>genetic methods are needed to introduce human ‘protective’ transgenes into pRBCs at the high levels required to prevent hemolysis and extend RBC survival in vivo. This review addresses recent progress and examines future prospects for clinical xenogeneic pRBC transfusion.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

同种异体人红细胞(hRBCs)的输注受到个体供体和受体之间的供应和兼容性的限制。在血液供应受到限制或没有兼容的红细胞的情况下,患者会受到影响。因此,需要补充现有红细胞输注策略的hRBCs替代品。猪红细胞(pRBCs)由于其丰富的供应和与hRBCs的功能相似性,可以提供一种替代品。对猪进行基因修饰以限制pRBC免疫原性并增加人类“保护性”蛋白表达的能力为这项研究提供了重大推动,并开辟了新的治疗途径。尽管在基因工程猪中已经实现了外源抗原表达的缺失,但仍需要新的遗传方法将人类“保护性”转基因以防止溶血和延长体内红细胞存活所需的高水平引入pRBCs。这篇综述介绍了临床异种pRBC输血的最新进展和未来前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future prospects for the clinical transfusion of pig red blood cells

Transfusion of allogeneic human red blood cell (hRBCs) is limited by supply and compatibility between individual donors and recipients. In situations where the blood supply is constrained or when no compatible RBCs are available, patients suffer. As a result, alternatives to hRBCs that complement existing RBC transfusion strategies are needed. Pig RBCs (pRBCs) could provide an alternative because of their abundant supply, and functional similarities to hRBCs. The ability to genetically modify pigs to limit pRBC immunogenicity and augment expression of human ‘protective’ proteins has provided major boosts to this research and opens up new therapeutic avenues. Although deletion of expression of xenoantigens has been achieved in genetically-engineered pigs, novel genetic methods are needed to introduce human ‘protective’ transgenes into pRBCs at the high levels required to prevent hemolysis and extend RBC survival in vivo. This review addresses recent progress and examines future prospects for clinical xenogeneic pRBC transfusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Reviews
Blood Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
1.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Blood Reviews, a highly regarded international journal, serves as a vital information hub, offering comprehensive evaluations of clinical practices and research insights from esteemed experts. Specially commissioned, peer-reviewed articles authored by leading researchers and practitioners ensure extensive global coverage across all sub-specialties of hematology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Breaking down frailty: Assessing vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia Longitudinal clinical manifestations of Fanconi anemia: A systematized review Absolute and functional iron deficiency: Biomarkers, impact on immune system, and therapy Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1