经颅彩色编码超声角度校正对颅内压升高的筛查作用。

Venkatakrishna Rajajee, Reza Soroushmehr, Craig A Williamson, Kayvan Najarian, Kevin Ward, Hakam Tiba
{"title":"经颅彩色编码超声角度校正对颅内压升高的筛查作用。","authors":"Venkatakrishna Rajajee,&nbsp;Reza Soroushmehr,&nbsp;Craig A Williamson,&nbsp;Kayvan Najarian,&nbsp;Kevin Ward,&nbsp;Hakam Tiba","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic neurocritical care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ultrasound assessment with TCCS.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP-CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37-0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58-0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29-96%) and specificity 28% (16-43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54-100%) and specificity 30% (17-46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47-0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55-0.92) with angle correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0953"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/ea/cc9-5-e0953.PMC10461938.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography With Angle Correction As a Screening Tool for Raised Intracranial Pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Venkatakrishna Rajajee,&nbsp;Reza Soroushmehr,&nbsp;Craig A Williamson,&nbsp;Kayvan Najarian,&nbsp;Kevin Ward,&nbsp;Hakam Tiba\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic neurocritical care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ultrasound assessment with TCCS.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP-CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37-0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58-0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29-96%) and specificity 28% (16-43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54-100%) and specificity 30% (17-46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47-0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55-0.92) with angle correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e0953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/ea/cc9-5-e0953.PMC10461938.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:经颅多普勒(TCD)作为一种无创颅内压(ICP)评估工具。用经颅彩色编码超声(TCCS)校正超声角度,这是一个潜在的误差来源,以前没有报道过用TCD评估颅内压。我们的目的是研究TCCS检测ICP升高的准确性,无论是否使用角度校正。设计:诊断准确性的前瞻性研究。环境:学术神经危重症监护室。患者:连续使用有创ICP监护仪的成年人。干预措施:超声评估与TCCS。测量方法及主要结果:测量双侧大脑中动脉舒张末期速度(EDV)、时间平均峰值速度(TAPV)和脉搏指数(PI)。同时记录平均动脉压(MAP)和颅内压(ICP)。估算脑灌注压(CPP)计算为估算CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14,估算ICP (ICPe) = MAP-CPPe。60例患者入组,55例接受TCCS。ICPe检测大于22 mm Hg有侵入性ICP的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,无角度校正的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.51(0.37 ~ 0.64),有角度校正的AUC为0.73(0.58 ~ 0.84)。无角度校正的最佳阈值为ICPe大于18 mm Hg,敏感性71%(29-96%),特异性28%(16-43%)。角度校正后,最佳阈值为ICPe大于21 mm Hg,灵敏度100%(54-100%),特异性30%(17-46%)。无角度校正的PI AUC为0.61(0.47 ~ 0.74),有角度校正的PI AUC为0.70(0.55 ~ 0.92)。结论:角度校正提高了TCCS检测颅内压升高的准确性。灵敏度高,作为合适的筛选工具,但特异性仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography With Angle Correction As a Screening Tool for Raised Intracranial Pressure.

Objectives: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction.

Design: Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.

Setting: Academic neurocritical care unit.

Patients: Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors.

Interventions: Ultrasound assessment with TCCS.

Measurements and main results: End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP-CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37-0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58-0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29-96%) and specificity 28% (16-43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54-100%) and specificity 30% (17-46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47-0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55-0.92) with angle correction.

Conclusions: Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1