肥胖症评估中的质量测量差距和未来方向。

IF 9.5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Current Obesity Reports Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s13679-023-00525-0
Tracy Zvenyach, William H Dietz
{"title":"肥胖症评估中的质量测量差距和未来方向。","authors":"Tracy Zvenyach, William H Dietz","doi":"10.1007/s13679-023-00525-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The disease of obesity continues to increase in prevalence and severity yet obesity care, treatment, and coverage are scarce. Progress has been made in the development and implementation of quality measures in clinical practice and organizational performance. However, major gaps and limitations exist in the context of measuring guideline-based clinical care for obesity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Obesity quality measures have entered various stages of testing and development, but only a select few are included in reporting and payment programs. One process measure for adults, \"Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan\" is used in Medicare. One process measure for pediatrics, \"Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescence\" is used in Medicare, health insurance plans, and Medicaid. No outcome or digital quality measure exists for the disease of obesity. One quality measure development project is underway that is testing the performance of four measures, including outcome measures for obesity. The general absence of quality measures for obesity means that there are no objective measures to address the quality of obesity care or its outcome. More meaningful efforts are needed to seriously integrate obesity with quality performance measurement and value in healthcare payment programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10846,"journal":{"name":"Current Obesity Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Measurement Gaps and Future Directions in the Assessment of Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Zvenyach, William H Dietz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13679-023-00525-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The disease of obesity continues to increase in prevalence and severity yet obesity care, treatment, and coverage are scarce. Progress has been made in the development and implementation of quality measures in clinical practice and organizational performance. However, major gaps and limitations exist in the context of measuring guideline-based clinical care for obesity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Obesity quality measures have entered various stages of testing and development, but only a select few are included in reporting and payment programs. One process measure for adults, \\\"Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan\\\" is used in Medicare. One process measure for pediatrics, \\\"Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescence\\\" is used in Medicare, health insurance plans, and Medicaid. No outcome or digital quality measure exists for the disease of obesity. One quality measure development project is underway that is testing the performance of four measures, including outcome measures for obesity. The general absence of quality measures for obesity means that there are no objective measures to address the quality of obesity care or its outcome. More meaningful efforts are needed to seriously integrate obesity with quality performance measurement and value in healthcare payment programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Obesity Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Obesity Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00525-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Obesity Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00525-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾的目的:肥胖症的发病率和严重程度不断增加,但肥胖症的护理、治疗和覆盖范围却很少。在制定和实施临床实践和组织绩效的质量衡量标准方面已经取得了进展。然而,在衡量以指南为基础的肥胖症临床治疗方面还存在重大差距和局限性:肥胖症质量测量已进入不同的测试和开发阶段,但只有少数被纳入报告和支付计划。其中一项针对成人的流程衡量标准是 "预防性保健和筛查":身体质量指数(BMI)筛查和随访计划 "被用于医疗保险。医疗保险、健康保险计划和医疗补助中使用了一项儿科流程测量,即 "儿童和青少年的体重评估及营养和体育活动咨询"。目前还没有针对肥胖症的结果或数字质量衡量标准。目前正在开展一个质量衡量标准开发项目,测试四项衡量标准的性能,包括肥胖症的结果衡量标准。普遍缺乏针对肥胖症的质量衡量标准意味着没有客观的衡量标准来衡量肥胖症的治疗质量或治疗效果。需要做出更多有意义的努力,将肥胖症与质量绩效衡量和医疗支付计划的价值认真结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Measurement Gaps and Future Directions in the Assessment of Obesity.

Purpose of review: The disease of obesity continues to increase in prevalence and severity yet obesity care, treatment, and coverage are scarce. Progress has been made in the development and implementation of quality measures in clinical practice and organizational performance. However, major gaps and limitations exist in the context of measuring guideline-based clinical care for obesity.

Recent findings: Obesity quality measures have entered various stages of testing and development, but only a select few are included in reporting and payment programs. One process measure for adults, "Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan" is used in Medicare. One process measure for pediatrics, "Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescence" is used in Medicare, health insurance plans, and Medicaid. No outcome or digital quality measure exists for the disease of obesity. One quality measure development project is underway that is testing the performance of four measures, including outcome measures for obesity. The general absence of quality measures for obesity means that there are no objective measures to address the quality of obesity care or its outcome. More meaningful efforts are needed to seriously integrate obesity with quality performance measurement and value in healthcare payment programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Obesity Reports
Current Obesity Reports Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The main objective of Current Obesity Reports is to provide expert review articles on recent advancements in the interdisciplinary field of obesity research. Our aim is to offer clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that will benefit all individuals involved in the treatment and prevention of obesity, as well as related conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, endocrine disorders, gynecological issues, cancer, mental health, respiratory complications, and rheumatological diseases. We strive to redefine the way knowledge is expressed and provide organized content for the benefit of our readership.
期刊最新文献
Osteokines in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Correction: A Systematic Review of Proteomics in Obesity: Unpacking the Molecular Puzzle. Alcohol Drinking Impacts on Adiposity and Steatotic Liver Disease: Concurrent Effects on Metabolic Pathways and Cardiovascular Risks. A Systematic Review of Proteomics in Obesity: Unpacking the Molecular Puzzle. Sarcopenic Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: An Overlooked but High-Risk Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1