不可切除晚期或复发结直肠癌患者一线治疗期间血栓栓塞的危险因素:一项回顾性短期研究。

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1186/s40780-023-00291-0
Ryo Takada, Miki Fujiwara, Masatoshi Maki, Yoko Takahashi, Koji Tamura
{"title":"不可切除晚期或复发结直肠癌患者一线治疗期间血栓栓塞的危险因素:一项回顾性短期研究。","authors":"Ryo Takada,&nbsp;Miki Fujiwara,&nbsp;Masatoshi Maki,&nbsp;Yoko Takahashi,&nbsp;Koji Tamura","doi":"10.1186/s40780-023-00291-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cancer is a risk factor for developing thromboembolism, so is the use of molecularly targeted therapies. This study aimed to determine whether thromboembolism incidence differed between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor use in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, and to compare the risk of thromboembolism caused by cancer and the use of molecular targeted therapy drugs.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with a cytotoxic anticancer drug and a VEGF or EGFR inhibitor combination between April 2016 and October 2021. Patients were compared in terms of the regimen administered, thromboembolism occurrence during the first-line treatment period, patient background, and clinical laboratory values. Of the 179 included patients, 12 of 134 (8.9%) in the VEGF-inhibitor group and 8 of 45 (17.8%) in the EGFR-inhibitor group developed thromboembolism, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in time to thromboembolism between patients in the VEGF- inhibitor group and patients in the EGFR-inhibitor group (P = 0.206). The cutoff value determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis for the occurrence of thromboembolism was one point. Multivariate analysis using the occurrence of thromboembolism as the response variable identified at least one risk factor for thromboembolism (odds ratio = 4.17, P = 0.006, 95% confidence interval = 1.51-11.50). Molecular targeted therapies were not identified as a risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the small sample size, there was no difference in the incidence of thromboembolism between the two molecular-targeted therapies in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Our results suggest that risk factors for thromboembolism may be more strongly influenced by cancer itself than by the use of molecularly targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for thromboembolism during first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a retrospective short study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Takada,&nbsp;Miki Fujiwara,&nbsp;Masatoshi Maki,&nbsp;Yoko Takahashi,&nbsp;Koji Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40780-023-00291-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cancer is a risk factor for developing thromboembolism, so is the use of molecularly targeted therapies. This study aimed to determine whether thromboembolism incidence differed between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor use in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, and to compare the risk of thromboembolism caused by cancer and the use of molecular targeted therapy drugs.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with a cytotoxic anticancer drug and a VEGF or EGFR inhibitor combination between April 2016 and October 2021. Patients were compared in terms of the regimen administered, thromboembolism occurrence during the first-line treatment period, patient background, and clinical laboratory values. Of the 179 included patients, 12 of 134 (8.9%) in the VEGF-inhibitor group and 8 of 45 (17.8%) in the EGFR-inhibitor group developed thromboembolism, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in time to thromboembolism between patients in the VEGF- inhibitor group and patients in the EGFR-inhibitor group (P = 0.206). The cutoff value determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis for the occurrence of thromboembolism was one point. Multivariate analysis using the occurrence of thromboembolism as the response variable identified at least one risk factor for thromboembolism (odds ratio = 4.17, P = 0.006, 95% confidence interval = 1.51-11.50). Molecular targeted therapies were not identified as a risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the small sample size, there was no difference in the incidence of thromboembolism between the two molecular-targeted therapies in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Our results suggest that risk factors for thromboembolism may be more strongly influenced by cancer itself than by the use of molecularly targeted therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00291-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00291-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然癌症是发生血栓栓塞的危险因素,但分子靶向治疗的使用也是如此。本研究旨在确定不可切除的晚期或复发结直肠癌患者使用血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂是否存在血栓栓塞发生率差异,并比较癌症引起血栓栓塞的风险和使用分子靶向治疗药物的风险。主体:我们回顾性评估了2016年4月至2021年10月期间接受细胞毒性抗癌药物和VEGF或EGFR抑制剂联合治疗的不可切除晚期或复发结直肠癌患者。比较患者的治疗方案、一线治疗期间血栓栓塞发生率、患者背景和临床实验室值。在纳入的179例患者中,vegf抑制剂组134例中有12例(8.9%)发生血栓栓塞,egfr抑制剂组45例中有8例(17.8%)发生血栓栓塞,两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.11)。VEGF-抑制剂组与egfr -抑制剂组发生血栓栓塞的时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.206)。由受试者工作特征分析确定的血栓栓塞发生的临界值为1点。以血栓栓塞的发生作为反应变量的多因素分析确定了至少一个血栓栓塞的危险因素(优势比= 4.17,P = 0.006, 95%置信区间= 1.51-11.50)。分子靶向治疗未被确定为危险因素。结论:虽然样本量小,但两种分子靶向治疗在一线治疗不可切除晚期或复发结直肠癌患者的血栓栓塞发生率无差异。我们的研究结果表明,血栓栓塞的危险因素可能更强烈地受到癌症本身的影响,而不是使用分子靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for thromboembolism during first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a retrospective short study.

Background: While cancer is a risk factor for developing thromboembolism, so is the use of molecularly targeted therapies. This study aimed to determine whether thromboembolism incidence differed between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor use in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, and to compare the risk of thromboembolism caused by cancer and the use of molecular targeted therapy drugs.

Main body: We retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with a cytotoxic anticancer drug and a VEGF or EGFR inhibitor combination between April 2016 and October 2021. Patients were compared in terms of the regimen administered, thromboembolism occurrence during the first-line treatment period, patient background, and clinical laboratory values. Of the 179 included patients, 12 of 134 (8.9%) in the VEGF-inhibitor group and 8 of 45 (17.8%) in the EGFR-inhibitor group developed thromboembolism, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in time to thromboembolism between patients in the VEGF- inhibitor group and patients in the EGFR-inhibitor group (P = 0.206). The cutoff value determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis for the occurrence of thromboembolism was one point. Multivariate analysis using the occurrence of thromboembolism as the response variable identified at least one risk factor for thromboembolism (odds ratio = 4.17, P = 0.006, 95% confidence interval = 1.51-11.50). Molecular targeted therapies were not identified as a risk factor.

Conclusions: Although the small sample size, there was no difference in the incidence of thromboembolism between the two molecular-targeted therapies in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Our results suggest that risk factors for thromboembolism may be more strongly influenced by cancer itself than by the use of molecularly targeted therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compatibility of hypokalaemia caused by low-dose prednisolone plus abiraterone acetate therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A qualitative study on the current status and problems of pharmacists in home healthcare from the viewpoint of care managers in medically underpopulated areas in Japan. Effects of famotidine use during pregnancy: an observational cohort study. Development and validation of the prediction score for augmented renal clearance in critically Ill Japanese adults. Investigating the hypothermic effects of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials on non-bacterial fever model mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1