无针激光注射器与针注射用于皮肤增强和真皮填充物的再生效果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1002/lsm.23719
Hye Sung Han MD, Bo Ri Kim MD, PhD, Minjae Kim MD, Jung-Im Na MD, PhD, Suk Bae Seo MD, Chang-Hun Huh MD, PhD, Jung-Won Shin MD, PhD
{"title":"无针激光注射器与针注射用于皮肤增强和真皮填充物的再生效果。","authors":"Hye Sung Han MD,&nbsp;Bo Ri Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Minjae Kim MD,&nbsp;Jung-Im Na MD, PhD,&nbsp;Suk Bae Seo MD,&nbsp;Chang-Hun Huh MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jung-Won Shin MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>A needleless laser-induced microjet injector is a novel transdermal drug delivery system that can rapidly inject a very small and precise drug dose into the skin with minimal pain and downtime. In this study, we aimed to compare the laser-induced microjet injection versus needle injection of polylactic acid/hyaluronic acid filler for skin enhancement and rejuvenation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted. The enrolled patients underwent one treatment session of dermal filler injection using a laser-induced microjet injector on one half of the face or a traditional needle injection on the other half of the face. Evaluation was conducted at baseline before treatment and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A single treatment of filler injection with a laser-induced microjet injector resulted in similar improvements in skin hydration and elasticity as a single treatment of filler injection by using manual needle injection, with reduced pain, side effects, and decreased treatment time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Laser-induced microjet injector enabled not only the application of a controlled dose and filler depth but also even distribution, improved clinical efficacy, reduced pain and side effects, and sufficient time for clinicians to perform treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Needleless laser injector versus needle injection for skin enhancement and rejuvenation effect of dermal filler\",\"authors\":\"Hye Sung Han MD,&nbsp;Bo Ri Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Minjae Kim MD,&nbsp;Jung-Im Na MD, PhD,&nbsp;Suk Bae Seo MD,&nbsp;Chang-Hun Huh MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jung-Won Shin MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.23719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>A needleless laser-induced microjet injector is a novel transdermal drug delivery system that can rapidly inject a very small and precise drug dose into the skin with minimal pain and downtime. In this study, we aimed to compare the laser-induced microjet injection versus needle injection of polylactic acid/hyaluronic acid filler for skin enhancement and rejuvenation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted. The enrolled patients underwent one treatment session of dermal filler injection using a laser-induced microjet injector on one half of the face or a traditional needle injection on the other half of the face. Evaluation was conducted at baseline before treatment and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A single treatment of filler injection with a laser-induced microjet injector resulted in similar improvements in skin hydration and elasticity as a single treatment of filler injection by using manual needle injection, with reduced pain, side effects, and decreased treatment time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laser-induced microjet injector enabled not only the application of a controlled dose and filler depth but also even distribution, improved clinical efficacy, reduced pain and side effects, and sufficient time for clinicians to perform treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:无针激光诱导微射流注射器是一种新型的透皮给药系统,可以在最小的疼痛和停机时间内将非常小和精确的药物剂量快速注射到皮肤中。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较激光诱导微射流注射与针头注射聚乳酸/透明质酸填充物对皮肤增强和再生的作用。患者和方法:进行一项为期24周的前瞻性、单中心、评估者盲法、随机、分面研究。入选患者接受了一次真皮填充物注射治疗,在半张脸上使用激光诱导微射流注射器,或在另一半脸上使用传统针头注射。在治疗前基线和治疗后4、12和24周进行评估。结果:用激光诱导微射流注射器单次治疗填充剂注射,与用手动针头注射填充剂注射单次治疗相比,皮肤水合作用和弹性得到了类似的改善,疼痛、副作用减少,治疗时间缩短。结论:激光诱导的微射流注射器不仅能够控制剂量和填充深度,而且能够均匀分布,提高临床疗效,减少疼痛和副作用,并为临床医生提供足够的时间进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Needleless laser injector versus needle injection for skin enhancement and rejuvenation effect of dermal filler

Background and Objectives

A needleless laser-induced microjet injector is a novel transdermal drug delivery system that can rapidly inject a very small and precise drug dose into the skin with minimal pain and downtime. In this study, we aimed to compare the laser-induced microjet injection versus needle injection of polylactic acid/hyaluronic acid filler for skin enhancement and rejuvenation.

Patients and Methods

A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted. The enrolled patients underwent one treatment session of dermal filler injection using a laser-induced microjet injector on one half of the face or a traditional needle injection on the other half of the face. Evaluation was conducted at baseline before treatment and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Results

A single treatment of filler injection with a laser-induced microjet injector resulted in similar improvements in skin hydration and elasticity as a single treatment of filler injection by using manual needle injection, with reduced pain, side effects, and decreased treatment time.

Conclusions

Laser-induced microjet injector enabled not only the application of a controlled dose and filler depth but also even distribution, improved clinical efficacy, reduced pain and side effects, and sufficient time for clinicians to perform treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
期刊最新文献
Defining the Treatment Window: Early Versus Late Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy for Posttraumatic and Surgical Scars in Asian Patients. Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning. The 2910-nm Fiber Laser Is Safe and Effective for Improving Acne Scarring. Timing of Laser Intervention on Facial Scars: A 3D Imaging and Scar Scale Analysis in a Retrospective Study. Use of Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Properties of Cutaneous Defects Following Radiofrequency Microneedling and Laser Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1