{"title":"评估两种CAD/CAM铣削系统制造的牙修复体及其3D打印方法制造的原型的准确性:一项体外研究","authors":"Ali Alenezi, Mohammed Yehya","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal accuracy of all-ceramic onlay restorations and prototypes fabricated using additive and subtractive methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten typodont first molars were prepared and scanned two times using two different scanners: ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental) and CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona). The two groups of virtual models were used to design two groups of virtual onlay restorations using two different CAD software (n = 10 each group) and exported in STL files. Each group of STL files was converted to physical onlay restorations and prototypes by using three different methods; these included two additive manufacturing techniques, stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP), and one subtractive technique, e.max milling using the KaVo Everest system and the Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5. A digital microscope was used to evaluate the marginal fit around the onlay restorations or prototypes on the typodont teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All evaluated groups showed mean marginal gaps between 59 and 84 µm. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the marginal accuracy of onlay restorations fabricated by the subtractive method and onlay prototypes from the two additive methods, SLA (P = .70) and DLP (P = .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the models evaluated produced marginal gaps within the reported acceptable clinical range. Thus, these subtractive and additive methods may be considered suitable for onlay restoration production.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 3","pages":"293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Accuracy of Dental Restorations Manufactured by Two CAD/CAM Milling Systems and Their Prototypes Fabricated by 3D Printing Methods: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Ali Alenezi, Mohammed Yehya\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.7633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal accuracy of all-ceramic onlay restorations and prototypes fabricated using additive and subtractive methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten typodont first molars were prepared and scanned two times using two different scanners: ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental) and CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona). The two groups of virtual models were used to design two groups of virtual onlay restorations using two different CAD software (n = 10 each group) and exported in STL files. Each group of STL files was converted to physical onlay restorations and prototypes by using three different methods; these included two additive manufacturing techniques, stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP), and one subtractive technique, e.max milling using the KaVo Everest system and the Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5. A digital microscope was used to evaluate the marginal fit around the onlay restorations or prototypes on the typodont teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All evaluated groups showed mean marginal gaps between 59 and 84 µm. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the marginal accuracy of onlay restorations fabricated by the subtractive method and onlay prototypes from the two additive methods, SLA (P = .70) and DLP (P = .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the models evaluated produced marginal gaps within the reported acceptable clinical range. Thus, these subtractive and additive methods may be considered suitable for onlay restoration production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"293-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7633\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Accuracy of Dental Restorations Manufactured by Two CAD/CAM Milling Systems and Their Prototypes Fabricated by 3D Printing Methods: An In Vitro Study
Purpose: This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal accuracy of all-ceramic onlay restorations and prototypes fabricated using additive and subtractive methods.
Materials and methods: Ten typodont first molars were prepared and scanned two times using two different scanners: ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental) and CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona). The two groups of virtual models were used to design two groups of virtual onlay restorations using two different CAD software (n = 10 each group) and exported in STL files. Each group of STL files was converted to physical onlay restorations and prototypes by using three different methods; these included two additive manufacturing techniques, stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP), and one subtractive technique, e.max milling using the KaVo Everest system and the Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5. A digital microscope was used to evaluate the marginal fit around the onlay restorations or prototypes on the typodont teeth.
Results: All evaluated groups showed mean marginal gaps between 59 and 84 µm. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the marginal accuracy of onlay restorations fabricated by the subtractive method and onlay prototypes from the two additive methods, SLA (P = .70) and DLP (P = .21).
Conclusion: All the models evaluated produced marginal gaps within the reported acceptable clinical range. Thus, these subtractive and additive methods may be considered suitable for onlay restoration production.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP)
Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.