发展浸信会健康伤害风险评估第一阶段:探索风险因素。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001313
C Preston Lewis, Reece Schenkenfelder, Claire C Davies, Martha Monroe, Deanna Acton, Tracy Phillips
{"title":"发展浸信会健康伤害风险评估第一阶段:探索风险因素。","authors":"C Preston Lewis,&nbsp;Reece Schenkenfelder,&nbsp;Claire C Davies,&nbsp;Martha Monroe,&nbsp;Deanna Acton,&nbsp;Tracy Phillips","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for developing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) among critically ill adult inpatients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain a priority quality focus for Magnet ® organizations. Recent studies cite medical devices as a primary cause, yet published risk assessments lack inclusion of those threats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nurses at a 434-bed, 4-time Magnet ® -designated hospital led a retrospective study acros 9 American Nurses Credentialing Center-designated facilities. Using a chart review tool, data were collected within 48 hours of a confirmed HAPI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 207 HAPIs reported, 54% (n = 113) involved deep tissue pressure injuries and 50.2% (n = 104) involved 19 medical devices. Individuals with a HAPI also used 1 or more of 7 distinct types of mobility-limiting medical equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings support the development of a critical care risk assessment with inclusion of a medical device and mobility-limiting medical equipment as risk factors. A secondary study is underway for specificity and sensitivity testing of this assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Baptist Health Injury Risk Assessment Phase 1: Exploring Risk Factors.\",\"authors\":\"C Preston Lewis,&nbsp;Reece Schenkenfelder,&nbsp;Claire C Davies,&nbsp;Martha Monroe,&nbsp;Deanna Acton,&nbsp;Tracy Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for developing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) among critically ill adult inpatients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain a priority quality focus for Magnet ® organizations. Recent studies cite medical devices as a primary cause, yet published risk assessments lack inclusion of those threats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nurses at a 434-bed, 4-time Magnet ® -designated hospital led a retrospective study acros 9 American Nurses Credentialing Center-designated facilities. Using a chart review tool, data were collected within 48 hours of a confirmed HAPI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 207 HAPIs reported, 54% (n = 113) involved deep tissue pressure injuries and 50.2% (n = 104) involved 19 medical devices. Individuals with a HAPI also used 1 or more of 7 distinct types of mobility-limiting medical equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings support the development of a critical care risk assessment with inclusion of a medical device and mobility-limiting medical equipment as risk factors. A secondary study is underway for specificity and sensitivity testing of this assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨危重成人住院患者发生医院获得性压力损伤(HAPIs)的危险因素。背景:医院获得性压力伤害仍然是Magnet®组织优先关注的质量问题。最近的研究将医疗设备列为主要原因,但已发表的风险评估缺乏将这些威胁包括在内。方法:一家拥有434张床位、4次获得Magnet®认证的医院的护士在9家美国护士资格认证中心指定的机构中领导了一项回顾性研究。使用图表审查工具,在确认HAPI后48小时内收集数据。结果:在报告的207例HAPIs中,54% (n = 113)涉及深部组织压力损伤,50.2% (n = 104)涉及19种医疗器械。患有HAPI的人还使用了7种不同类型的限制行动的医疗设备中的一种或多种。结论:研究结果支持重症监护风险评估的发展,其中包括医疗器械和限制行动的医疗设备作为风险因素。另一项研究正在进行特异性和敏感性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing the Baptist Health Injury Risk Assessment Phase 1: Exploring Risk Factors.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for developing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) among critically ill adult inpatients.

Background: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries remain a priority quality focus for Magnet ® organizations. Recent studies cite medical devices as a primary cause, yet published risk assessments lack inclusion of those threats.

Methods: Nurses at a 434-bed, 4-time Magnet ® -designated hospital led a retrospective study acros 9 American Nurses Credentialing Center-designated facilities. Using a chart review tool, data were collected within 48 hours of a confirmed HAPI.

Results: Of 207 HAPIs reported, 54% (n = 113) involved deep tissue pressure injuries and 50.2% (n = 104) involved 19 medical devices. Individuals with a HAPI also used 1 or more of 7 distinct types of mobility-limiting medical equipment.

Conclusions: Study findings support the development of a critical care risk assessment with inclusion of a medical device and mobility-limiting medical equipment as risk factors. A secondary study is underway for specificity and sensitivity testing of this assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
National Incidence of Nurse Suicide and Associated Features. Exploring Reasons for Satisfaction with Job Assignments Among Travel Nurses. Institution-Wide Moral Distress Among Nurses. Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1