基于系统的身体评估:早期发现临床恶化和降低死亡率。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2023113
Shannan K Hamlin, Nicole M Fontenot, Steven J Hooker, Hsin-Mei Chen
{"title":"基于系统的身体评估:早期发现临床恶化和降低死亡率。","authors":"Shannan K Hamlin,&nbsp;Nicole M Fontenot,&nbsp;Steven J Hooker,&nbsp;Hsin-Mei Chen","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2023113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite efforts to improve early detection of deterioration in a patient's condition, delays in activating the rapid response team remain common.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate delays in activating the rapid response team and the occurrence of serious adverse events before and after implementation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at nurses' performing systems-based physical assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort design was used to evaluate all patients who had a rapid response team activation during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1080 patients were included in the analysis: 536 patients before the quality improvement initiative and 544 patients after the quality improvement initiative. The delay in activating the rapid response team decreased from 11.7 hours in the before group to 9.6 hours in the after group (P < .001). In the after group, fewer patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (36% vs 41%, P = .02) and those who were transferred had 3.58 times greater odds of death than those who stayed at the same level of care. The after group had a 44% reduction in the odds of mortality compared with the before group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When nurses focus on conducting a systems-based physical assessment early in their shift, delays in recognizing a patient's deteriorating condition are reduced, fewer patients are admitted to the intensive care unit, and mortality is significantly reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systems-Based Physical Assessments: Earlier Detection of Clinical Deterioration and Reduced Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Shannan K Hamlin,&nbsp;Nicole M Fontenot,&nbsp;Steven J Hooker,&nbsp;Hsin-Mei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ajcc2023113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite efforts to improve early detection of deterioration in a patient's condition, delays in activating the rapid response team remain common.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate delays in activating the rapid response team and the occurrence of serious adverse events before and after implementation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at nurses' performing systems-based physical assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort design was used to evaluate all patients who had a rapid response team activation during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1080 patients were included in the analysis: 536 patients before the quality improvement initiative and 544 patients after the quality improvement initiative. The delay in activating the rapid response team decreased from 11.7 hours in the before group to 9.6 hours in the after group (P < .001). In the after group, fewer patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (36% vs 41%, P = .02) and those who were transferred had 3.58 times greater odds of death than those who stayed at the same level of care. The after group had a 44% reduction in the odds of mortality compared with the before group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When nurses focus on conducting a systems-based physical assessment early in their shift, delays in recognizing a patient's deteriorating condition are reduced, fewer patients are admitted to the intensive care unit, and mortality is significantly reduced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2023113\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2023113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管努力提高对患者病情恶化的早期检测,但启动快速反应小组的延迟仍然很常见。目的:评估在实施旨在护士进行基于系统的身体评估的质量改进计划前后,启动快速反应小组的延迟以及严重不良事件的发生情况。方法:采用回顾性观察性队列设计对研究期间所有快速反应团队激活的患者进行评估。结果:共有1080名患者被纳入分析:536名患者在质量改进计划前,544名患者为质量改进计划后。启动快速反应小组的延迟从前一组的11.7小时减少到后一组的9.6小时(P<.001)。在后一组中,转移到重症监护室的患者更少(36%对41%,P=0.02),转移的患者的死亡几率是留在同一级别护理的患者的3.58倍。与治疗前相比,治疗后组的死亡率降低了44%。结论:当护士在轮班初期专注于进行基于系统的身体评估时,识别患者病情恶化的延迟会减少,入住重症监护室的患者会减少,死亡率也会显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systems-Based Physical Assessments: Earlier Detection of Clinical Deterioration and Reduced Mortality.

Background: Despite efforts to improve early detection of deterioration in a patient's condition, delays in activating the rapid response team remain common.

Objectives: To evaluate delays in activating the rapid response team and the occurrence of serious adverse events before and after implementation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at nurses' performing systems-based physical assessments.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort design was used to evaluate all patients who had a rapid response team activation during the study period.

Results: A total of 1080 patients were included in the analysis: 536 patients before the quality improvement initiative and 544 patients after the quality improvement initiative. The delay in activating the rapid response team decreased from 11.7 hours in the before group to 9.6 hours in the after group (P < .001). In the after group, fewer patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (36% vs 41%, P = .02) and those who were transferred had 3.58 times greater odds of death than those who stayed at the same level of care. The after group had a 44% reduction in the odds of mortality compared with the before group.

Conclusions: When nurses focus on conducting a systems-based physical assessment early in their shift, delays in recognizing a patient's deteriorating condition are reduced, fewer patients are admitted to the intensive care unit, and mortality is significantly reduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Assess Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical Pearls. Courage to Soar in Clinical Research. Discussion Guide for the Krupp Article. E Is for Early Mobility and Improved Patient Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1