1型糖尿病患者体重指数与死亡率的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 4.7 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.7570/jomes22061
Han Na Jung, Sehee Kim, Chang Hee Jung, Yun Kyung Cho
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者体重指数与死亡率的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Han Na Jung,&nbsp;Sehee Kim,&nbsp;Chang Hee Jung,&nbsp;Yun Kyung Cho","doi":"10.7570/jomes22061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been poorly examined and has never been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis investigated the all-cause mortality risk for each BMI category among patients with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. Cohort studies comparing the mortality risk between BMI categories among patients with T1DM were eligible. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality among underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (BMI, 25 to <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) individuals were calculated in reference to the normal-weight group (BMI, 18.5 to <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three prospective studies involving 23,407 adults were included. The underweight group was shown to have a 3.4 times greater risk of mortality than the normal-weight group (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67 to 6.85). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between the normal-weight group and the overweight group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.22) or the obese group (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.86 to 2.15), possibly due to the heterogeneous results of these BMI categories among the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Underweight patients with T1DM had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than their normal-weight counterparts. Overweight and obese patients showed heterogeneous risks across the studies. Further prospective studies on patients with T1DM are required to establish weight management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":45386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"32 2","pages":"151-162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/ac/jomes-32-2-151.PMC10327680.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Body Mass Index and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Han Na Jung,&nbsp;Sehee Kim,&nbsp;Chang Hee Jung,&nbsp;Yun Kyung Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.7570/jomes22061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been poorly examined and has never been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis investigated the all-cause mortality risk for each BMI category among patients with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. Cohort studies comparing the mortality risk between BMI categories among patients with T1DM were eligible. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality among underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (BMI, 25 to <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) individuals were calculated in reference to the normal-weight group (BMI, 18.5 to <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three prospective studies involving 23,407 adults were included. The underweight group was shown to have a 3.4 times greater risk of mortality than the normal-weight group (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67 to 6.85). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between the normal-weight group and the overweight group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.22) or the obese group (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.86 to 2.15), possibly due to the heterogeneous results of these BMI categories among the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Underweight patients with T1DM had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than their normal-weight counterparts. Overweight and obese patients showed heterogeneous risks across the studies. Further prospective studies on patients with T1DM are required to establish weight management guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"151-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/ac/jomes-32-2-151.PMC10327680.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes22061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes22061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者身体质量指数(BMI)与死亡率之间的相关性研究很少,也从未有过系统的综述。本荟萃分析调查了T1DM患者中每个BMI类别的全因死亡率风险。方法:于2022年7月对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统文献综述。比较T1DM患者不同BMI类别死亡风险的队列研究符合条件。参照正常体重组(BMI, 18.5至2),计算体重不足(BMI 2)、超重(BMI 25至2)和肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)个体全因死亡率的合并危险比(hr)。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入了三项前瞻性研究,涉及23,407名成年人。体重不足组的死亡风险是体重正常组的3.4倍(95%可信区间[CI], 1.67至6.85)。同时,正常体重组与超重组的死亡风险差异无统计学意义(HR, 0.90;95% CI, 0.66 ~ 1.22)或肥胖组(HR, 1.36;95% CI, 0.86 - 2.15),可能是由于纳入的研究中这些BMI类别的结果存在异质性。结论:体重不足的T1DM患者的全因死亡率明显高于体重正常的T1DM患者。超重和肥胖患者在研究中表现出不同的风险。需要对T1DM患者进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以建立体重管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between Body Mass Index and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been poorly examined and has never been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis investigated the all-cause mortality risk for each BMI category among patients with T1DM.

Methods: A systematic literature review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. Cohort studies comparing the mortality risk between BMI categories among patients with T1DM were eligible. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality among underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), overweight (BMI, 25 to <30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) individuals were calculated in reference to the normal-weight group (BMI, 18.5 to <25 kg/m2). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results: Three prospective studies involving 23,407 adults were included. The underweight group was shown to have a 3.4 times greater risk of mortality than the normal-weight group (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67 to 6.85). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between the normal-weight group and the overweight group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.22) or the obese group (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.86 to 2.15), possibly due to the heterogeneous results of these BMI categories among the included studies.

Conclusion: Underweight patients with T1DM had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than their normal-weight counterparts. Overweight and obese patients showed heterogeneous risks across the studies. Further prospective studies on patients with T1DM are required to establish weight management guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was launched in 1992 and diverse studies on obesity have been published under the title of Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity until 2004. Since 2017, volume 26, the title is now the Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome (pISSN 2508-6235, eISSN 2508-7576). The journal is published quarterly on March 30th, June 30th, September 30th and December 30th. The official title of the journal is now "Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome" and the abbreviated title is "J Obes Metab Syndr". Index words from medical subject headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus are included in each article to facilitate article search. Some or all of the articles of this journal are included in the index of PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Embase, DOAJ, Ebsco, KCI, KoreaMed, KoMCI, Science Central, Crossref Metadata Search, Google Scholar, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Effects of Anti-Obesity Strategies on Bone Mineral Density: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Separating the Effects of Early-Life and Adult Body Size on Chronic Kidney Disease Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Ratio of Skeletal Muscle Mass to Visceral Fat Area Is a Useful Marker for Assessing Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction among Koreans with Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the Random Forest Model. A Review of Mendelian Randomization: Assumptions, Methods, and Application to Obesity-Related Diseases. Obesity Phenotypes, Lifestyle Medicine, and Population Health: Precision Needed Everywhere!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1