听力损失成年人的单击和特定水平 CE Chirp 刺激听性脑干反应的比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1055/a-2165-0874
Seval Ceylan, Şule Çekiç
{"title":"听力损失成年人的单击和特定水平 CE Chirp 刺激听性脑干反应的比较。","authors":"Seval Ceylan, Şule Çekiç","doi":"10.1055/a-2165-0874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two adult patients (<i>n</i> = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (<i>n</i> = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (<i>n</i> = 38) with hearing loss (<i>p</i> = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Click and Level-Specific CE Chirp-Stimulated Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults with Hearing Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Seval Ceylan, Şule Çekiç\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2165-0874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two adult patients (<i>n</i> = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (<i>n</i> = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (<i>n</i> = 38) with hearing loss (<i>p</i> = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-0874\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-0874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:听觉脑干反应(ABRs)中使用的克劳斯-埃尔伯林啁啾(CE-Chirp)刺激是为了补偿耳蜗波延迟而开发的。作为宽带 CE-Chirp 刺激的一个版本,使用特定水平(LS)CE-Chirp 刺激正变得越来越普遍,这种刺激具有适合声音传播强度水平的不同延迟模型。研究目的:本研究旨在比较感音神经性听力损失成人的点击式 ABR 与 LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值:本研究为横断面分析研究:研究样本:22 名患有双侧感音神经性听力损失的成年患者(n = 44 耳):对成年双侧感音神经性听力损失患者(男 13 人,女 9 人;42.86 ± 14.50 岁)进行纯音测听、单击 ABR 和 LS CE-Chirp ABR 测试。比较了单击 ABR 和 LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值与 2 kHz、4 kHz 和 2 至 4 kHz 平均行为听力阈值的接近程度:结果:两种 ABR 刺激都能识别全聋患者(n = 6)。在有听力损失的其他耳朵(n = 38)中,LS CE-Chirp ABR阈值(53.81 ± 20.28 分贝正常听力水平 [dB nHL])和点击 ABR阈值(58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL)之间存在明显差异(p = 0.00)。当双耳一起评估和左右耳分别评估时,LS CE-Chirp ABR阈值和4 kHz听力阈值之间没有差异(p = 0.66、0.80和0.69):结论:对于听力损失的成年人,与点击刺激相比,LS CE-Chirp 在 2 和 4 kHz 频率下提供的 ABR 阈值更接近行为听力阈值。值得注意的是,LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值与 4 kHz 行为听力阈值之间没有差异。我们的结论是,LS CE-Chirp 可以有效地用于估计听力损失成人的行为听阈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Click and Level-Specific CE Chirp-Stimulated Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults with Hearing Loss.

Background:  The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.

Purpose:  The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Research design:  The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.

Study sample:  Twenty-two adult patients (n = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.

Data collection and analysis:  Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.

Results:  Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (n = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (n = 38) with hearing loss (p = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (p = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).

Conclusion:  In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, Including Preliminary Analyses of the Parent Versions for Use with Children. A Survey on Hearing Loss, Dizziness, and Balance Problems as Fall Risk Factors: Responses of Older Adults Seen by Audiologists. Does Chronic Subjective Tinnitus Affect Cognitive Performance In Adults with Hearing Thresholds of 25 dB and Less Between 0.5-4 kHz. Measuring Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Everyday Listening Situations: Retrospective and In Situ Assessments Complement Each Other. Long-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults with Williams Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1