{"title":"听力损失成年人的单击和特定水平 CE Chirp 刺激听性脑干反应的比较。","authors":"Seval Ceylan, Şule Çekiç","doi":"10.1055/a-2165-0874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two adult patients (<i>n</i> = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (<i>n</i> = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (<i>n</i> = 38) with hearing loss (<i>p</i> = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Click and Level-Specific CE Chirp-Stimulated Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults with Hearing Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Seval Ceylan, Şule Çekiç\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2165-0874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two adult patients (<i>n</i> = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (<i>n</i> = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (<i>n</i> = 38) with hearing loss (<i>p</i> = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-0874\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-0874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:听觉脑干反应(ABRs)中使用的克劳斯-埃尔伯林啁啾(CE-Chirp)刺激是为了补偿耳蜗波延迟而开发的。作为宽带 CE-Chirp 刺激的一个版本,使用特定水平(LS)CE-Chirp 刺激正变得越来越普遍,这种刺激具有适合声音传播强度水平的不同延迟模型。研究目的:本研究旨在比较感音神经性听力损失成人的点击式 ABR 与 LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值:本研究为横断面分析研究:研究样本:22 名患有双侧感音神经性听力损失的成年患者(n = 44 耳):对成年双侧感音神经性听力损失患者(男 13 人,女 9 人;42.86 ± 14.50 岁)进行纯音测听、单击 ABR 和 LS CE-Chirp ABR 测试。比较了单击 ABR 和 LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值与 2 kHz、4 kHz 和 2 至 4 kHz 平均行为听力阈值的接近程度:结果:两种 ABR 刺激都能识别全聋患者(n = 6)。在有听力损失的其他耳朵(n = 38)中,LS CE-Chirp ABR阈值(53.81 ± 20.28 分贝正常听力水平 [dB nHL])和点击 ABR阈值(58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL)之间存在明显差异(p = 0.00)。当双耳一起评估和左右耳分别评估时,LS CE-Chirp ABR阈值和4 kHz听力阈值之间没有差异(p = 0.66、0.80和0.69):结论:对于听力损失的成年人,与点击刺激相比,LS CE-Chirp 在 2 和 4 kHz 频率下提供的 ABR 阈值更接近行为听力阈值。值得注意的是,LS CE-Chirp ABR 阈值与 4 kHz 行为听力阈值之间没有差异。我们的结论是,LS CE-Chirp 可以有效地用于估计听力损失成人的行为听阈。
Comparison of Click and Level-Specific CE Chirp-Stimulated Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults with Hearing Loss.
Background: The Claus Elberling Chirp (CE-Chirp) stimulus used in the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) was developed to compensate for the cochlear wave delay. As a version of broadband CE-Chirp stimulus, the use of level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp stimuli, which are created with varying delay models suitable for the intensity levels at which the sound is transmitted, is becoming increasingly common.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare click ABRs with LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Research design: The research is a cross-sectional, analytical research.
Study sample: Twenty-two adult patients (n = 44 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included in the study.
Data collection and analysis: Pure-tone audiometry, click ABR, and LS CE-Chirp ABR tests were performed on adult (13 males and 9 females; 42.86 ± 14.50 years) patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Click ABR and LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were compared in terms of proximity to behavioral hearing thresholds of 2 kHz, 4 kHz, and 2 to 4 kHz averages.
Results: Both types of ABR stimuli were able to identify with total hearing loss (n = 6). A significant difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds (53.81 ± 20.28 decibel normal hearing level [dB nHL]) and click ABR thresholds (58.81 ± 19.11 dB nHL) in the other ears (n = 38) with hearing loss (p = 0.00). When both ears were evaluated together and the right and left ears were evaluated separately, no difference was found between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and 4 kHz hearing thresholds (p = 0.66, 0.80, and 0.69, respectively).
Conclusion: In adults with hearing loss, the LS CE-Chirp provides ABR thresholds closer to the behavioral hearing thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz compared with the click stimulus. Notably, there was no difference between LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds and the 4 kHz behavioral hearing thresholds. We concluded that the LS CE-Chirp can be used effectively in the estimation of behavioral hearing thresholds in adults with hearing loss.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.