自然语言处理在日本病历中表达疾病特征的另一种应用。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2039-3773
Yoshinori Yamanouchi, Taishi Nakamura, Tokunori Ikeda, Koichiro Usuku
{"title":"自然语言处理在日本病历中表达疾病特征的另一种应用。","authors":"Yoshinori Yamanouchi,&nbsp;Taishi Nakamura,&nbsp;Tokunori Ikeda,&nbsp;Koichiro Usuku","doi":"10.1055/a-2039-3773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Owing to the linguistic situation, Japanese natural language processing (NLP) requires morphological analyses for word segmentation using dictionary techniques.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to clarify whether it can be substituted with an open-end discovery-based NLP (OD-NLP), which does not use any dictionary techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical texts at the first medical visit were collected for comparison of OD-NLP with word dictionary-based-NLP (WD-NLP). Topics were generated in each document using a topic model, which later corresponded to the respective diseases determined in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 revision. The prediction accuracy and expressivity of each disease were examined in equivalent number of entities/words after filtration with either term frequency and inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) or dominance value (DMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In documents from 10,520 observed patients, 169,913 entities and 44,758 words were segmented using OD-NLP and WD-NLP, simultaneously. Without filtering, accuracy and recall levels were low, and there was no difference in the harmonic mean of the F-measure between NLPs. However, physicians reported OD-NLP contained more meaningful words than WD-NLP. When datasets were created in an equivalent number of entities/words with TF-IDF, F-measure in OD-NLP was higher than WD-NLP at lower thresholds. When the threshold increased, the number of datasets created decreased, resulting in increased values of F-measure, although the differences disappeared. Two datasets near the maximum threshold showing differences in F-measure were examined whether their topics were associated with diseases. The results showed that more diseases were found in OD-NLP at lower thresholds, indicating that the topics described characteristics of diseases. The superiority remained as much as that of TF-IDF when filtration was changed to DMV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings prefer the use of OD-NLP to express characteristics of diseases from Japanese clinical texts and may help in the construction of document summaries and retrieval in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"62 3-04","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/3b/10-1055-a-2039-3773.PMC10462427.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Alternative Application of Natural Language Processing to Express a Characteristic Feature of Diseases in Japanese Medical Records.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Yamanouchi,&nbsp;Taishi Nakamura,&nbsp;Tokunori Ikeda,&nbsp;Koichiro Usuku\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2039-3773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Owing to the linguistic situation, Japanese natural language processing (NLP) requires morphological analyses for word segmentation using dictionary techniques.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to clarify whether it can be substituted with an open-end discovery-based NLP (OD-NLP), which does not use any dictionary techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical texts at the first medical visit were collected for comparison of OD-NLP with word dictionary-based-NLP (WD-NLP). Topics were generated in each document using a topic model, which later corresponded to the respective diseases determined in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 revision. The prediction accuracy and expressivity of each disease were examined in equivalent number of entities/words after filtration with either term frequency and inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) or dominance value (DMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In documents from 10,520 observed patients, 169,913 entities and 44,758 words were segmented using OD-NLP and WD-NLP, simultaneously. Without filtering, accuracy and recall levels were low, and there was no difference in the harmonic mean of the F-measure between NLPs. However, physicians reported OD-NLP contained more meaningful words than WD-NLP. When datasets were created in an equivalent number of entities/words with TF-IDF, F-measure in OD-NLP was higher than WD-NLP at lower thresholds. When the threshold increased, the number of datasets created decreased, resulting in increased values of F-measure, although the differences disappeared. Two datasets near the maximum threshold showing differences in F-measure were examined whether their topics were associated with diseases. The results showed that more diseases were found in OD-NLP at lower thresholds, indicating that the topics described characteristics of diseases. The superiority remained as much as that of TF-IDF when filtration was changed to DMV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings prefer the use of OD-NLP to express characteristics of diseases from Japanese clinical texts and may help in the construction of document summaries and retrieval in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"62 3-04\",\"pages\":\"110-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/3b/10-1055-a-2039-3773.PMC10462427.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-3773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-3773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日语自然语言处理(NLP)中,由于语言环境的原因,需要使用词典技术进行词法分析来进行分词。目的:我们旨在澄清是否可以用不使用任何字典技术的开放式基于发现的NLP (OD-NLP)代替它。方法:收集首次就诊时的临床文献,将OD-NLP与基于单词词典的nlp (WD-NLP)进行比较。在每个文件中使用主题模型生成主题,这些主题后来对应于《疾病和相关健康问题国际统计分类10》修订版中确定的各自疾病。每一种疾病的预测准确性和表达性在用术语频率和逆文档频率(TF-IDF)或优势值(DMV)过滤后,以等量的实体/单词进行检测。结果:在10520例患者的文献中,同时使用OD-NLP和WD-NLP对169,913个实体和44,758个单词进行了分割。在未进行过滤的情况下,nlp的准确率和召回率都很低,f测量的谐波平均值在nlp之间没有差异。然而,医生报告OD-NLP比WD-NLP包含更多有意义的单词。当使用TF-IDF以相同数量的实体/词创建数据集时,在较低阈值下,OD-NLP的F-measure高于WD-NLP。当阈值增加时,创建的数据集数量减少,导致F-measure值增加,尽管差异消失。两个接近最大阈值的数据集显示f值差异,检查其主题是否与疾病相关。结果表明,在较低阈值下,OD-NLP中发现的疾病较多,说明主题描述了疾病的特征。当过滤改为DMV时,其优越性与TF-IDF相同。结论:目前的研究结果更倾向于使用OD-NLP来表达日本临床文献的疾病特征,可能有助于临床文献摘要和检索的构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Alternative Application of Natural Language Processing to Express a Characteristic Feature of Diseases in Japanese Medical Records.

Background: Owing to the linguistic situation, Japanese natural language processing (NLP) requires morphological analyses for word segmentation using dictionary techniques.

Objective: We aimed to clarify whether it can be substituted with an open-end discovery-based NLP (OD-NLP), which does not use any dictionary techniques.

Methods: Clinical texts at the first medical visit were collected for comparison of OD-NLP with word dictionary-based-NLP (WD-NLP). Topics were generated in each document using a topic model, which later corresponded to the respective diseases determined in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 revision. The prediction accuracy and expressivity of each disease were examined in equivalent number of entities/words after filtration with either term frequency and inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) or dominance value (DMV).

Results: In documents from 10,520 observed patients, 169,913 entities and 44,758 words were segmented using OD-NLP and WD-NLP, simultaneously. Without filtering, accuracy and recall levels were low, and there was no difference in the harmonic mean of the F-measure between NLPs. However, physicians reported OD-NLP contained more meaningful words than WD-NLP. When datasets were created in an equivalent number of entities/words with TF-IDF, F-measure in OD-NLP was higher than WD-NLP at lower thresholds. When the threshold increased, the number of datasets created decreased, resulting in increased values of F-measure, although the differences disappeared. Two datasets near the maximum threshold showing differences in F-measure were examined whether their topics were associated with diseases. The results showed that more diseases were found in OD-NLP at lower thresholds, indicating that the topics described characteristics of diseases. The superiority remained as much as that of TF-IDF when filtration was changed to DMV.

Conclusion: The current findings prefer the use of OD-NLP to express characteristics of diseases from Japanese clinical texts and may help in the construction of document summaries and retrieval in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop. Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Contrast Medium Doses for Computed Tomography Angiography Using Optimized Clinical Parameter Sets. Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm to Pseudonymize Documents in the Context of a Clinical Data Warehouse. Deep Learning for Predicting Progression of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Based on Lateral Knee Radiographs, Demographic Data, and Symptomatic Assessments. Europe's Largest Research Infrastructure for Curated Medical Data Models with Semantic Annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1