紧急护理服务评估合作方法的益处。

Q3 Nursing Emergency Nurse Pub Date : 2023-09-05 Epub Date: 2022-11-22 DOI:10.7748/en.2022.e2160
Craig Brown, Deborah Armstrong, Alexandra Gibbins, Rhiannon Roynon, Alice Groves, Alastair Richards, Claire McCarthy, Richard Bowen, Helena White, Mike Brady
{"title":"紧急护理服务评估合作方法的益处。","authors":"Craig Brown, Deborah Armstrong, Alexandra Gibbins, Rhiannon Roynon, Alice Groves, Alastair Richards, Claire McCarthy, Richard Bowen, Helena White, Mike Brady","doi":"10.7748/en.2022.e2160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaboration and service evaluation are essential enablers for improving models of health and social care. Significant benefits can be achieved when they are combined to form a collaborative service evaluation, particularly when such collaboration involves different clinical professions. This article uses the NHS 111 Wales service to explore a simple example of collaborative service evaluation and to discuss the benefits and challenges identified. While the tabletop exercises described were expected to focus solely on compliance data and the reasons for non-compliance, broader learning was identified for all parties involved. It became clear that there was a lack of shared understanding of each service, and that there were opportunities for education and opportunities to develop new national pathways. It is hoped that readers may be able to compare, learn and possibly replicate the collaborative approach used in their practice settings to achieve similar outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35711,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Nurse","volume":"31 5","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of a collaborative approach to service evaluation in urgent care.\",\"authors\":\"Craig Brown, Deborah Armstrong, Alexandra Gibbins, Rhiannon Roynon, Alice Groves, Alastair Richards, Claire McCarthy, Richard Bowen, Helena White, Mike Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/en.2022.e2160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Collaboration and service evaluation are essential enablers for improving models of health and social care. Significant benefits can be achieved when they are combined to form a collaborative service evaluation, particularly when such collaboration involves different clinical professions. This article uses the NHS 111 Wales service to explore a simple example of collaborative service evaluation and to discuss the benefits and challenges identified. While the tabletop exercises described were expected to focus solely on compliance data and the reasons for non-compliance, broader learning was identified for all parties involved. It became clear that there was a lack of shared understanding of each service, and that there were opportunities for education and opportunities to develop new national pathways. It is hoped that readers may be able to compare, learn and possibly replicate the collaborative approach used in their practice settings to achieve similar outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Nurse\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"27-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2022.e2160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2022.e2160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合作与服务评估是改进医疗和社会护理模式的基本手段。当二者结合形成合作服务评估时,尤其是当这种合作涉及到不同的临床专业时,可以取得显著的效益。本文以威尔士国家医疗服务系统 111 服务为例,探讨了合作服务评估的一个简单例子,并讨论了所发现的益处和面临的挑战。虽然所述的桌面演练预计仅关注合规数据和不合规的原因,但对所有参与方而言,却发现了更广泛的学习内容。我们清楚地认识到,各方对每项服务都缺乏共同的理解,存在着教育机会和开发新的国家途径的机会。希望读者能够进行比较、学习,并在可能的情况下复制其实践环境中使用的合作方法,以取得类似的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits of a collaborative approach to service evaluation in urgent care.

Collaboration and service evaluation are essential enablers for improving models of health and social care. Significant benefits can be achieved when they are combined to form a collaborative service evaluation, particularly when such collaboration involves different clinical professions. This article uses the NHS 111 Wales service to explore a simple example of collaborative service evaluation and to discuss the benefits and challenges identified. While the tabletop exercises described were expected to focus solely on compliance data and the reasons for non-compliance, broader learning was identified for all parties involved. It became clear that there was a lack of shared understanding of each service, and that there were opportunities for education and opportunities to develop new national pathways. It is hoped that readers may be able to compare, learn and possibly replicate the collaborative approach used in their practice settings to achieve similar outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Nurse
Emergency Nurse Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
A united nursing front can change blame and toxic-centred cultures Keep it clear to engage your readers So you would like to be an advanced practitioner How to turn around a toxic culture of blame and shame Bowing fractures of the forearm in children: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1