长期增长结果的趋势:两个出生队列的比较(2007-08年和2015-16年)。

Kallem Venkat Reddy, Challa V S Lakshmi, Sai Kiran, Srinivas Murki
{"title":"长期增长结果的趋势:两个出生队列的比较(2007-08年和2015-16年)。","authors":"Kallem Venkat Reddy,&nbsp;Challa V S Lakshmi,&nbsp;Sai Kiran,&nbsp;Srinivas Murki","doi":"10.24911/SJP.106-1560160872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants comprise between 4% and 8% of live-births and about one-third of deaths during the neonatal period. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the long-term growth outcomes of VLBW infants among two different birth cohorts: Cohort 2007-08 (cohort 1) and cohort 2015-16 (cohort 2), in a cross-sectional observational study. The neonatal and perinatal data of cohort 1 was collected from available trial data and the same data from cohort 2 was collected from patient case files and patient history. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the growth outcomes of VLBW infants attending the follow-up clinic between 12 and 18 months of corrected age from two different birth cohorts. Respectively, 238 and 268 infants were eligible for inclusion in cohort 1 and 2. Among the eligible infants, 148 infants in cohort 1 and 178 infants in cohort 2 were available for primary outcome assessment during the recruitment phase. The weight and length at corrected age (12 to 18 months) is significantly higher in cohort 2 compared to that in cohorts 1 although the mean age at assessment is similar between the two groups. There is a significant reduction in the incidence of underweight in infants that belonged to cohort 2. The proportions of infants who are underweight at follow-up were significantly lower in cohort 2 when compared to cohort 1, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of stunting and microcephaly among both the cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74884,"journal":{"name":"Sudanese journal of paediatrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468632/pdf/sjp-23-68.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in long term growth outcome: comparison of two birth cohorts (year 2007-08 and year 2015-16).\",\"authors\":\"Kallem Venkat Reddy,&nbsp;Challa V S Lakshmi,&nbsp;Sai Kiran,&nbsp;Srinivas Murki\",\"doi\":\"10.24911/SJP.106-1560160872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants comprise between 4% and 8% of live-births and about one-third of deaths during the neonatal period. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the long-term growth outcomes of VLBW infants among two different birth cohorts: Cohort 2007-08 (cohort 1) and cohort 2015-16 (cohort 2), in a cross-sectional observational study. The neonatal and perinatal data of cohort 1 was collected from available trial data and the same data from cohort 2 was collected from patient case files and patient history. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the growth outcomes of VLBW infants attending the follow-up clinic between 12 and 18 months of corrected age from two different birth cohorts. Respectively, 238 and 268 infants were eligible for inclusion in cohort 1 and 2. Among the eligible infants, 148 infants in cohort 1 and 178 infants in cohort 2 were available for primary outcome assessment during the recruitment phase. The weight and length at corrected age (12 to 18 months) is significantly higher in cohort 2 compared to that in cohorts 1 although the mean age at assessment is similar between the two groups. There is a significant reduction in the incidence of underweight in infants that belonged to cohort 2. The proportions of infants who are underweight at follow-up were significantly lower in cohort 2 when compared to cohort 1, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of stunting and microcephaly among both the cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudanese journal of paediatrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"68-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468632/pdf/sjp-23-68.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudanese journal of paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24911/SJP.106-1560160872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudanese journal of paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24911/SJP.106-1560160872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

极低出生体重婴儿占活产婴儿的4%至8%,约占新生儿期死亡人数的三分之一。本研究的目的是在一项横断面观察性研究中,评估和比较两个不同出生队列中VLBW婴儿的长期生长结局:队列2007-08(队列1)和队列2015-16(队列2)。队列1的新生儿和围产期数据来自现有的试验数据,队列2的相同数据来自患者病例档案和患者病史。该研究的主要结果是比较来自两个不同出生队列的12至18个月矫正年龄的VLBW婴儿在随访诊所的生长结果。分别有238名和268名婴儿符合纳入队列1和队列2的条件。在符合条件的婴儿中,队列1中的148名婴儿和队列2中的178名婴儿在招募阶段可用于主要结局评估。校正年龄(12至18个月)时,队列2的体重和身高明显高于队列1,尽管两组的平均评估年龄相似。在属于队列2的婴儿中,体重不足的发生率显著降低。随访时体重不足的婴儿比例在队列2中明显低于队列1,在两个队列中发育迟缓和小头畸形的发生率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in long term growth outcome: comparison of two birth cohorts (year 2007-08 and year 2015-16).

Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants comprise between 4% and 8% of live-births and about one-third of deaths during the neonatal period. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the long-term growth outcomes of VLBW infants among two different birth cohorts: Cohort 2007-08 (cohort 1) and cohort 2015-16 (cohort 2), in a cross-sectional observational study. The neonatal and perinatal data of cohort 1 was collected from available trial data and the same data from cohort 2 was collected from patient case files and patient history. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the growth outcomes of VLBW infants attending the follow-up clinic between 12 and 18 months of corrected age from two different birth cohorts. Respectively, 238 and 268 infants were eligible for inclusion in cohort 1 and 2. Among the eligible infants, 148 infants in cohort 1 and 178 infants in cohort 2 were available for primary outcome assessment during the recruitment phase. The weight and length at corrected age (12 to 18 months) is significantly higher in cohort 2 compared to that in cohorts 1 although the mean age at assessment is similar between the two groups. There is a significant reduction in the incidence of underweight in infants that belonged to cohort 2. The proportions of infants who are underweight at follow-up were significantly lower in cohort 2 when compared to cohort 1, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of stunting and microcephaly among both the cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A bibliometric analysis of the research outcome of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum 2019-2023. Children's body mass index and associated factors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Comments on 'neuroblastoma in Sudan: experience of a single institute'. Comments on the pathophysiology of isoniazid-induced psychosis regarding the article 'Pyridoxine in isoniazid-induced psychosis'. Establishing the Saudi pediatric and youth diabetes registry: initial data and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1