基因组变异对患者吸入支气管扩张剂反应的影响:全面更新。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17425255.2023.2221848
Maria Gabriella Matera, Paola Rogliani, Giuseppe Novelli, Mario Cazzola
{"title":"基因组变异对患者吸入支气管扩张剂反应的影响:全面更新。","authors":"Maria Gabriella Matera,&nbsp;Paola Rogliani,&nbsp;Giuseppe Novelli,&nbsp;Mario Cazzola","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2023.2221848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The bronchodilator response (BDR) depends on many factors, including genetic ones. Numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influencing BDR have been identified. However, despite several studies in this field, genetic variations are not currently being utilized to support the use of bronchodilators.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, the possible impact of genetic variants on BDR is discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Pharmacogenetic studies of β<sub>2</sub>-agonists have mainly focused on ADRB2 gene. Three SNPs, A46G, C79G, and C491T, have functional significance. However, other uncommon variants may contribute to individual variability in salbutamol response. SNPs haplotypes in ADRB2 may have a role. Many variants in gene coding for muscarinic ACh receptor (mAChR) have been reported, particularly in the M<sub>2</sub> and, to a lesser degree, M<sub>3</sub> mAChRs, but no consistent evidence for a pharmacological relevance of these SNPs has been reported. Moreover, there is a link between SNPs and ethnic and/or age profiles regarding BDR. Nevertheless, replication of pharmacogenetic results is limited and often, BDR is dissociated from what is expected based on SNP identification. Pharmacogenetic studies on bronchodilators must continue. However, they must integrate data derived from a multi-omics approach with epigenetic factors that may modify BDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"19 5","pages":"285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of genomic variants on patient response to inhaled bronchodilators: a comprehensive update.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Gabriella Matera,&nbsp;Paola Rogliani,&nbsp;Giuseppe Novelli,&nbsp;Mario Cazzola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2023.2221848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The bronchodilator response (BDR) depends on many factors, including genetic ones. Numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influencing BDR have been identified. However, despite several studies in this field, genetic variations are not currently being utilized to support the use of bronchodilators.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, the possible impact of genetic variants on BDR is discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Pharmacogenetic studies of β<sub>2</sub>-agonists have mainly focused on ADRB2 gene. Three SNPs, A46G, C79G, and C491T, have functional significance. However, other uncommon variants may contribute to individual variability in salbutamol response. SNPs haplotypes in ADRB2 may have a role. Many variants in gene coding for muscarinic ACh receptor (mAChR) have been reported, particularly in the M<sub>2</sub> and, to a lesser degree, M<sub>3</sub> mAChRs, but no consistent evidence for a pharmacological relevance of these SNPs has been reported. Moreover, there is a link between SNPs and ethnic and/or age profiles regarding BDR. Nevertheless, replication of pharmacogenetic results is limited and often, BDR is dissociated from what is expected based on SNP identification. Pharmacogenetic studies on bronchodilators must continue. However, they must integrate data derived from a multi-omics approach with epigenetic factors that may modify BDR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"285-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2221848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2221848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)取决于许多因素,包括遗传因素。已经确定了许多影响BDR的单核苷酸多态性(snp)。然而,尽管在这一领域进行了几项研究,目前还没有利用遗传变异来支持支气管扩张剂的使用。涉及领域:在这篇叙述性综述中,讨论了遗传变异对BDR的可能影响。专家意见:β2激动剂的药物遗传学研究主要集中在ADRB2基因上。A46G、C79G和C491T三个snp具有功能意义。然而,其他不常见的变异可能导致沙丁胺醇反应的个体差异。ADRB2中的snp单倍型可能起作用。据报道,毒蕈碱ACh受体(mAChR)的许多基因编码变异,特别是在M2和较小程度的M3 mAChR中,但没有一致的证据表明这些snp与药理学相关。此外,snp与BDR的种族和/或年龄谱之间存在联系。然而,药物遗传学结果的复制是有限的,而且通常,BDR与基于SNP鉴定的预期分离。支气管扩张剂的药理学研究必须继续进行。然而,他们必须将来自多组学方法的数据与可能改变BDR的表观遗传因素结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of genomic variants on patient response to inhaled bronchodilators: a comprehensive update.

Introduction: The bronchodilator response (BDR) depends on many factors, including genetic ones. Numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influencing BDR have been identified. However, despite several studies in this field, genetic variations are not currently being utilized to support the use of bronchodilators.

Areas covered: In this narrative review, the possible impact of genetic variants on BDR is discussed.

Expert opinion: Pharmacogenetic studies of β2-agonists have mainly focused on ADRB2 gene. Three SNPs, A46G, C79G, and C491T, have functional significance. However, other uncommon variants may contribute to individual variability in salbutamol response. SNPs haplotypes in ADRB2 may have a role. Many variants in gene coding for muscarinic ACh receptor (mAChR) have been reported, particularly in the M2 and, to a lesser degree, M3 mAChRs, but no consistent evidence for a pharmacological relevance of these SNPs has been reported. Moreover, there is a link between SNPs and ethnic and/or age profiles regarding BDR. Nevertheless, replication of pharmacogenetic results is limited and often, BDR is dissociated from what is expected based on SNP identification. Pharmacogenetic studies on bronchodilators must continue. However, they must integrate data derived from a multi-omics approach with epigenetic factors that may modify BDR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data. Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.
期刊最新文献
A critical need for ‘gut neutrality’: mitigating adverse drug-microbiome interactions Drug interactions in cardiology: focus on statins and their combination with other lipid-lowering drugs Assessing the therapeutic and toxicological profile of novel GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes Clinical pharmacokinetics of glipizide: a systematic review Intraocular drugs: pharmacokinetic strategies and the influence on efficacy and durability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1