心血管植入式电子设备中汽车无源无钥匙进入的电磁干扰。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Expert Review of Medical Devices Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2255126
Narawudt Prasertwitayakij, Taradol Komolmis, Siriluck Gunaparn, Cheeranun Pisespongsa, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Wanwarang Wongcharoen, Teerapat Nantsupawat
{"title":"心血管植入式电子设备中汽车无源无钥匙进入的电磁干扰。","authors":"Narawudt Prasertwitayakij,&nbsp;Taradol Komolmis,&nbsp;Siriluck Gunaparn,&nbsp;Cheeranun Pisespongsa,&nbsp;Arintaya Phrommintikul,&nbsp;Wanwarang Wongcharoen,&nbsp;Teerapat Nantsupawat","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2255126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The automobile passive keyless entry (PKE) system is a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). We aim to determine the incidence and significance of EMI from automobile PKE system in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand. Patients with CIED were instructed to lock and unlock two automobiles using the PKE system. Any EMI or arrhythmias were detected by CIED interrogation and single-lead electrocardiogram event recorder. We also used a spectrum analyzer to identify the automobiles working frequency bandwidth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a total of 102 CIED patients. Device types included 48.0% defibrillators, 37.3% permanent pacemakers, and 14.7% cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Both interrogated data from device and event monitor revealed no incidence of EMI during the PKE activation. We failed to identify the working frequency bandwidth of the two studied cars due to very low signal strength, thus blended in with the background noise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automobile PKE systems transmitted very low power signals. Therefore, under normal circumstances, CIED patients can use automobile PKE system safely without any EMI regardless of key fob positions in relation to the CIED pulse generator.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the identification number is NCT03016390.</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":" ","pages":"973-977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electromagnetic interference from automobile passive keyless entry in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.\",\"authors\":\"Narawudt Prasertwitayakij,&nbsp;Taradol Komolmis,&nbsp;Siriluck Gunaparn,&nbsp;Cheeranun Pisespongsa,&nbsp;Arintaya Phrommintikul,&nbsp;Wanwarang Wongcharoen,&nbsp;Teerapat Nantsupawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2023.2255126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The automobile passive keyless entry (PKE) system is a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). We aim to determine the incidence and significance of EMI from automobile PKE system in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand. Patients with CIED were instructed to lock and unlock two automobiles using the PKE system. Any EMI or arrhythmias were detected by CIED interrogation and single-lead electrocardiogram event recorder. We also used a spectrum analyzer to identify the automobiles working frequency bandwidth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a total of 102 CIED patients. Device types included 48.0% defibrillators, 37.3% permanent pacemakers, and 14.7% cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Both interrogated data from device and event monitor revealed no incidence of EMI during the PKE activation. We failed to identify the working frequency bandwidth of the two studied cars due to very low signal strength, thus blended in with the background noise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automobile PKE systems transmitted very low power signals. Therefore, under normal circumstances, CIED patients can use automobile PKE system safely without any EMI regardless of key fob positions in relation to the CIED pulse generator.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the identification number is NCT03016390.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"973-977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2255126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2255126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:汽车无钥匙进入系统是一个潜在的电磁干扰源。我们的目的是确定心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)患者中来自汽车PKE系统的EMI的发生率和意义。方法:这是一项在泰国Maharaj Nakorn清迈医院进行的单中心横断面研究。CIED患者被要求使用PKE系统锁定和解锁两辆汽车。通过CIED询问和单导联心电图事件记录器检测任何EMI或心律失常。我们还使用频谱分析仪来识别汽车的工作频带。结果:共有102例CIED患者。设备类型包括48.0%的除颤器、37.3%的永久性起搏器和14.7%的心脏再同步治疗设备。来自设备和事件监测器的询问数据均显示,在PKE激活期间未发生EMI。由于信号强度很低,我们未能确定两辆被研究汽车的工作频率带宽,因此与背景噪声混合在一起。结论:汽车PKE系统传输的信号功率很低。因此,在正常情况下,无论钥匙扣相对于CIED脉冲发生器的位置如何,CIED患者都可以在没有任何EMI的情况下安全地使用汽车PKE系统。试验注册:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(https://clinicaltrials.gov),标识号为NCT03016390。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electromagnetic interference from automobile passive keyless entry in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Introduction: The automobile passive keyless entry (PKE) system is a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). We aim to determine the incidence and significance of EMI from automobile PKE system in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) patients.

Methods: This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand. Patients with CIED were instructed to lock and unlock two automobiles using the PKE system. Any EMI or arrhythmias were detected by CIED interrogation and single-lead electrocardiogram event recorder. We also used a spectrum analyzer to identify the automobiles working frequency bandwidth.

Results: There was a total of 102 CIED patients. Device types included 48.0% defibrillators, 37.3% permanent pacemakers, and 14.7% cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Both interrogated data from device and event monitor revealed no incidence of EMI during the PKE activation. We failed to identify the working frequency bandwidth of the two studied cars due to very low signal strength, thus blended in with the background noise.

Conclusions: Automobile PKE systems transmitted very low power signals. Therefore, under normal circumstances, CIED patients can use automobile PKE system safely without any EMI regardless of key fob positions in relation to the CIED pulse generator.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the identification number is NCT03016390.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Future perspectives and challenges of artificial intelligence implementation in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices. His bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Novel insights into thoracic endografts technology for prevention of distal stent-graft induced new entry (dSINE) following endovascular repair of type B aortic dissections: from bench to bedside A profile on the WISE cortical strip for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring Comparative evaluation of blind supraglottic airway device insertion versus videolaryngoscope-guided technique in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1